胃镜检查镇静剂环丙酚联合小剂量舒芬太尼的有效剂量:一项采用偏心硬币设计的剂量探索研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Bingwei Hu, Ting Guan, Chenyuan Yu, Danfeng Wang, Qing Wang, Hongwei Wang
{"title":"胃镜检查镇静剂环丙酚联合小剂量舒芬太尼的有效剂量:一项采用偏心硬币设计的剂量探索研究。","authors":"Bingwei Hu, Ting Guan, Chenyuan Yu, Danfeng Wang, Qing Wang, Hongwei Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02986-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the 90% effective dose of ciprofol combined with 5 µg of sufentanil for sedation during gastroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a double-blind, single-center dose-finding study. The ciprofol dose was assigned using a biased coin design according to the response of the previous patient, except for the first one, for which the dose was 0.3 mg/kg. All patients received 5 µg of sufentanil. The criterion for successful sedation was gastroscope insertion without choking, coughing, or body movement. If the sedation of the previous patient was unsuccessful, the dose for the next patient was increased by 0.05 mg/kg; if the sedation of the previous patient was successful, the next dose was reduced by 0.05 mg/kg or remained the same according to the biased coin result. The 90% effective dose was obtained using isotonic regression (the 95% confidence interval was obtained using the bootstrapping method) as the primary method, and the results were obtained using probit regression as a sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three patients were included in this study. Patients were assigned to one of four dose groups using a biased coin toss: group A (0.30 mg/kg), group B (0.35 mg/kg), group C (0.40 mg/kg) or group D (0.45 mg/kg). The 90% effective dose was 0.367 (95% CI: 0.344-0.416) mg/kg according to isotonic regression and 0.368 (95% CI: 0.347-0.419) mg/kg according to probit regression. The differences in the incidence of hypotension, mean arterial pressure and heart rate among the dose groups were not statistically significant. However, there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean arterial pressure and heart rate (P < 0.05) after the administration of ciprofol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 90% effective dose of ciprofol combined with 5 µg of sufentanil for sedation during gastroscopy was determined to be 0.367 (95% CI: 0.344-0.416) mg/kg. Within the dose range of 0.3-0.45 mg/kg, ciprofol reduced the mean arterial pressure and heart rate in patients, but these effects were not dose-dependent.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective dose of ciprofol combined with low-dose sufentanil for sedation of gastroscopy: a dose-finding study using a biased coin design.\",\"authors\":\"Bingwei Hu, Ting Guan, Chenyuan Yu, Danfeng Wang, Qing Wang, Hongwei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-02986-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the 90% effective dose of ciprofol combined with 5 µg of sufentanil for sedation during gastroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a double-blind, single-center dose-finding study. The ciprofol dose was assigned using a biased coin design according to the response of the previous patient, except for the first one, for which the dose was 0.3 mg/kg. All patients received 5 µg of sufentanil. The criterion for successful sedation was gastroscope insertion without choking, coughing, or body movement. If the sedation of the previous patient was unsuccessful, the dose for the next patient was increased by 0.05 mg/kg; if the sedation of the previous patient was successful, the next dose was reduced by 0.05 mg/kg or remained the same according to the biased coin result. The 90% effective dose was obtained using isotonic regression (the 95% confidence interval was obtained using the bootstrapping method) as the primary method, and the results were obtained using probit regression as a sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three patients were included in this study. Patients were assigned to one of four dose groups using a biased coin toss: group A (0.30 mg/kg), group B (0.35 mg/kg), group C (0.40 mg/kg) or group D (0.45 mg/kg). The 90% effective dose was 0.367 (95% CI: 0.344-0.416) mg/kg according to isotonic regression and 0.368 (95% CI: 0.347-0.419) mg/kg according to probit regression. The differences in the incidence of hypotension, mean arterial pressure and heart rate among the dose groups were not statistically significant. However, there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean arterial pressure and heart rate (P < 0.05) after the administration of ciprofol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 90% effective dose of ciprofol combined with 5 µg of sufentanil for sedation during gastroscopy was determined to be 0.367 (95% CI: 0.344-0.416) mg/kg. Within the dose range of 0.3-0.45 mg/kg, ciprofol reduced the mean arterial pressure and heart rate in patients, but these effects were not dose-dependent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908005/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02986-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02986-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在确定胃镜检查时使用环丙酚联合 5 µg 舒芬太尼镇静的 90% 有效剂量:这是一项双盲、单中心剂量测定研究。除第一位患者的剂量为 0.3 毫克/千克外,其他患者的西泊酚剂量均根据前一位患者的反应采用偏心硬币设计分配。所有患者都服用了 5 µg 舒芬太尼。镇静成功的标准是插入胃镜时没有呛咳、咳嗽或身体移动。如果前一位患者镇静不成功,则下一位患者的剂量增加 0.05 毫克/千克;如果前一位患者镇静成功,则下一位患者的剂量减少 0.05 毫克/千克,或根据偏差硬币结果保持不变。90%有效剂量以等渗回归(95%置信区间以引导法得出)为主要方法,结果以probit回归为敏感性分析:本研究共纳入 53 名患者。研究采用偏向掷硬币法将患者分配到四个剂量组中的一组:A 组(0.30 毫克/千克)、B 组(0.35 毫克/千克)、C 组(0.40 毫克/千克)或 D 组(0.45 毫克/千克)。根据等渗回归,90% 有效剂量为 0.367(95% CI:0.344-0.416)毫克/公斤,根据概率回归,90% 有效剂量为 0.368(95% CI:0.347-0.419)毫克/公斤。各剂量组的低血压发生率、平均动脉压和心率差异无统计学意义。然而,平均动脉压和心率的下降在统计学上有显著意义(P 结 论:在不同剂量组中,环丙 氨蝶呤的 90% 有效剂量为 0.5 mg/kg:胃镜检查期间,环丙酚联合 5 µg 舒芬太尼镇静的 90% 有效剂量为 0.367 (95% CI: 0.344-0.416) mg/kg。在 0.3-0.45 毫克/千克的剂量范围内,环丙酚可降低患者的平均动脉压和心率,但这些影响并非剂量依赖性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effective dose of ciprofol combined with low-dose sufentanil for sedation of gastroscopy: a dose-finding study using a biased coin design.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the 90% effective dose of ciprofol combined with 5 µg of sufentanil for sedation during gastroscopy.

Methods: This was a double-blind, single-center dose-finding study. The ciprofol dose was assigned using a biased coin design according to the response of the previous patient, except for the first one, for which the dose was 0.3 mg/kg. All patients received 5 µg of sufentanil. The criterion for successful sedation was gastroscope insertion without choking, coughing, or body movement. If the sedation of the previous patient was unsuccessful, the dose for the next patient was increased by 0.05 mg/kg; if the sedation of the previous patient was successful, the next dose was reduced by 0.05 mg/kg or remained the same according to the biased coin result. The 90% effective dose was obtained using isotonic regression (the 95% confidence interval was obtained using the bootstrapping method) as the primary method, and the results were obtained using probit regression as a sensitivity analysis.

Results: Fifty-three patients were included in this study. Patients were assigned to one of four dose groups using a biased coin toss: group A (0.30 mg/kg), group B (0.35 mg/kg), group C (0.40 mg/kg) or group D (0.45 mg/kg). The 90% effective dose was 0.367 (95% CI: 0.344-0.416) mg/kg according to isotonic regression and 0.368 (95% CI: 0.347-0.419) mg/kg according to probit regression. The differences in the incidence of hypotension, mean arterial pressure and heart rate among the dose groups were not statistically significant. However, there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean arterial pressure and heart rate (P < 0.05) after the administration of ciprofol.

Conclusion: The 90% effective dose of ciprofol combined with 5 µg of sufentanil for sedation during gastroscopy was determined to be 0.367 (95% CI: 0.344-0.416) mg/kg. Within the dose range of 0.3-0.45 mg/kg, ciprofol reduced the mean arterial pressure and heart rate in patients, but these effects were not dose-dependent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信