添加LET可改善腘绳肌腱自体ACL重建,但骨-髌骨肌腱-骨自体移植效果更好。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Dustin Volkmer
{"title":"添加LET可改善腘绳肌腱自体ACL重建,但骨-髌骨肌腱-骨自体移植效果更好。","authors":"Dustin Volkmer","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains a hotly debated topic. Recent evidence continues to make a case against hamstring autograft, especially in high-risk populations, because of greater retear rates and increased risk of persistent laxity. Quadriceps tendon autograft is gaining more support with favorable biomechanic characteristics and retear rates similar to the \"gold-standard\" bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. In addition, the reemergence of lateral extra-articular tenodesis as an augmentation technique has demonstrated some protective effects in the setting of revisions and high-risk patients. Combined procedures are likely to be the most reliable way to provide stable long-term outcomes, especially with hamstring autograft, but bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and quad tendon autograft are more robust.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial Commentary: The Addition of Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Improves Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, but Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Is Better.\",\"authors\":\"Dustin Volkmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The optimal graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains a hotly debated topic. Recent evidence continues to make a case against hamstring autograft, especially in high-risk populations, because of greater retear rates and increased risk of persistent laxity. Quadriceps tendon autograft is gaining more support with favorable biomechanic characteristics and retear rates similar to the \\\"gold-standard\\\" bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. In addition, the reemergence of lateral extra-articular tenodesis as an augmentation technique has demonstrated some protective effects in the setting of revisions and high-risk patients. Combined procedures are likely to be the most reliable way to provide stable long-term outcomes, especially with hamstring autograft, but bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and quad tendon autograft are more robust.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.017\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ACL重建的最佳移植物选择仍然是一个激烈争论的话题。最近的证据继续支持自体腘绳肌腱移植,特别是在高危人群(女性、优秀运动员、全身性过度松弛)中,因为再撕裂率更高,持续松弛的风险增加。股四头肌腱自体移植物(quad)具有良好的生物力学特性(抗拉强度和增加的截面积)和类似“金标准”骨-髌骨肌腱-骨移植物(BTB)的再撕裂率,因此获得了更多的支持。此外,外侧关节外肌腱固定术作为一种增强技术的重新出现,在翻修和高风险患者中显示出一定的保护作用。联合手术可能是提供稳定长期结果的最可靠的方法,特别是腘绳肌腱自体移植,但BTB和股四头肌更为坚固。我决定用一个结实的扁钢弹簧把它固定在一个几乎笔直的位置,但不是完全笔直。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial Commentary: The Addition of Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Improves Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, but Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Is Better.

The optimal graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains a hotly debated topic. Recent evidence continues to make a case against hamstring autograft, especially in high-risk populations, because of greater retear rates and increased risk of persistent laxity. Quadriceps tendon autograft is gaining more support with favorable biomechanic characteristics and retear rates similar to the "gold-standard" bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. In addition, the reemergence of lateral extra-articular tenodesis as an augmentation technique has demonstrated some protective effects in the setting of revisions and high-risk patients. Combined procedures are likely to be the most reliable way to provide stable long-term outcomes, especially with hamstring autograft, but bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and quad tendon autograft are more robust.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信