关节镜半月板部分切除术患者术前Kellgren和Lawrence分级与术中Outerbridge评分之间的差异不大。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
C Christian D Rich, Logan Huff, Natalie A Lowenstein, Jillian L Mazzocca, Cale A Jacobs, Elizabeth G Matzkin
{"title":"关节镜半月板部分切除术患者术前Kellgren和Lawrence分级与术中Outerbridge评分之间的差异不大。","authors":"C Christian D Rich, Logan Huff, Natalie A Lowenstein, Jillian L Mazzocca, Cale A Jacobs, Elizabeth G Matzkin","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether there is a correlation between preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade and intraoperative Outerbridge score, which are both tools used to assess knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing knee arthroscopy and partial meniscectomy procedures with or without chondroplasty between August 2012 and October 2020 were enrolled in this study. Preoperative KL grades were recorded, and Outerbridge scores were obtained intraoperatively for each of the 6 joint surfaces (medial and lateral femoral condyle, medial and lateral tibial plateau, patella, and trochlea). The total Outerbridge score was then calculated by summing the grades for the 6 joint surfaces. The level of agreement between KL grade and Outerbridge score was assessed using Cohen weighted κ values, with 0 to 0.20 indicating no or slight agreement; 0.21 to 0.40, fair agreement; 0.41 to 0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61 to 0.80, substantial agreement; and greater than 0.80, almost perfect agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 468 patients were included in this study (271 women [58%] and 197 men [42%]; mean age, 49 years [standard deviation, 10.35 years]; mean body mass index, 30.5 [standard deviation, 7]). There was slight agreement between KL grade and total Outerbridge score (κ = 0.05), as well as between KL grade and Outerbridge score for individual joint surfaces (κ range, 0.04-0.20). Similar results were found when we individually analyzed female patients (κ range, 0.06-0.22) and male patients (κ range, 0-0.17) and when we compared patients younger than 40 years (κ range, 0.02-0.19) with those aged 40 years or older (κ range, 0.04-0.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is little agreement between the radiographic KL grade and the intraoperative Outerbridge classification system. Thus, the association between radiographic assessments and cartilage health may need to be reconsidered owing to this lack of correlation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Little Agreement Between Preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence Classification and Intraoperative Outerbridge Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy.\",\"authors\":\"C Christian D Rich, Logan Huff, Natalie A Lowenstein, Jillian L Mazzocca, Cale A Jacobs, Elizabeth G Matzkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether there is a correlation between preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade and intraoperative Outerbridge score, which are both tools used to assess knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing knee arthroscopy and partial meniscectomy procedures with or without chondroplasty between August 2012 and October 2020 were enrolled in this study. Preoperative KL grades were recorded, and Outerbridge scores were obtained intraoperatively for each of the 6 joint surfaces (medial and lateral femoral condyle, medial and lateral tibial plateau, patella, and trochlea). The total Outerbridge score was then calculated by summing the grades for the 6 joint surfaces. The level of agreement between KL grade and Outerbridge score was assessed using Cohen weighted κ values, with 0 to 0.20 indicating no or slight agreement; 0.21 to 0.40, fair agreement; 0.41 to 0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61 to 0.80, substantial agreement; and greater than 0.80, almost perfect agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 468 patients were included in this study (271 women [58%] and 197 men [42%]; mean age, 49 years [standard deviation, 10.35 years]; mean body mass index, 30.5 [standard deviation, 7]). There was slight agreement between KL grade and total Outerbridge score (κ = 0.05), as well as between KL grade and Outerbridge score for individual joint surfaces (κ range, 0.04-0.20). Similar results were found when we individually analyzed female patients (κ range, 0.06-0.22) and male patients (κ range, 0-0.17) and when we compared patients younger than 40 years (κ range, 0.02-0.19) with those aged 40 years or older (κ range, 0.04-0.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is little agreement between the radiographic KL grade and the intraoperative Outerbridge classification system. Thus, the association between radiographic assessments and cartilage health may need to be reconsidered owing to this lack of correlation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.010\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定术前Kellgren-Lawrence (KL)评分和术中Outerbridge评分之间是否存在相关性,这两种评分都是评估膝关节骨关节炎的工具。方法:2012年8月至2020年10月期间接受膝关节镜检查和部分半月板切除术并伴有或不伴有软骨成形术的患者纳入本研究。术前记录Kellgren-Lawrence (KL)评分,术中对6个关节面(股骨髁内侧和外侧、胫骨平台内侧和外侧、髌骨和滑车)分别进行Outerbridge评分。然后通过将六个接合面的等级相加来计算Outerbridge总分。使用科恩加权Kappa (K)来评估KL和Outerbridge等级之间的一致性水平,值从0到0.20表示不一致或轻微一致,0.21到0.40表示一般,0.41到0.6表示中等,0.61到0.8表示相当,大于0.8表示几乎完全一致。结果:共纳入468例患者,其中女性271例(58%),男性197例(42%),年龄49岁(10.35),BMI=30.5 (7) kg/m2。KL等级与Outerbridge总分(K=0.05)或KL等级与单个接合面(K值为0.04 ~ 0.20)之间有轻微的一致。单独分析女性患者(K范围为0.06 ~ 0.22)或男性患者(K范围为0 ~ 0.17),或比较40岁以下患者(K范围为0.02 ~ 0.19)与40岁以上患者(K范围为0.04 ~ 0.15)时,也发现了类似的结果。结论:影像学上KL分级与术中Outerbridge分级之间几乎没有一致性。因此,由于缺乏相关性,放射学评估与软骨健康之间的关系可能需要重新考虑。证据等级:IV:回顾性治疗病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Little Agreement Between Preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence Classification and Intraoperative Outerbridge Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy.

Purpose: To determine whether there is a correlation between preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade and intraoperative Outerbridge score, which are both tools used to assess knee osteoarthritis.

Methods: Patients undergoing knee arthroscopy and partial meniscectomy procedures with or without chondroplasty between August 2012 and October 2020 were enrolled in this study. Preoperative KL grades were recorded, and Outerbridge scores were obtained intraoperatively for each of the 6 joint surfaces (medial and lateral femoral condyle, medial and lateral tibial plateau, patella, and trochlea). The total Outerbridge score was then calculated by summing the grades for the 6 joint surfaces. The level of agreement between KL grade and Outerbridge score was assessed using Cohen weighted κ values, with 0 to 0.20 indicating no or slight agreement; 0.21 to 0.40, fair agreement; 0.41 to 0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61 to 0.80, substantial agreement; and greater than 0.80, almost perfect agreement.

Results: A total of 468 patients were included in this study (271 women [58%] and 197 men [42%]; mean age, 49 years [standard deviation, 10.35 years]; mean body mass index, 30.5 [standard deviation, 7]). There was slight agreement between KL grade and total Outerbridge score (κ = 0.05), as well as between KL grade and Outerbridge score for individual joint surfaces (κ range, 0.04-0.20). Similar results were found when we individually analyzed female patients (κ range, 0.06-0.22) and male patients (κ range, 0-0.17) and when we compared patients younger than 40 years (κ range, 0.02-0.19) with those aged 40 years or older (κ range, 0.04-0.15).

Conclusions: There is little agreement between the radiographic KL grade and the intraoperative Outerbridge classification system. Thus, the association between radiographic assessments and cartilage health may need to be reconsidered owing to this lack of correlation.

Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信