IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Orthelo Léonel Gbètoho Atigossou, Julie Faieta, Maëlle Corcuff, Alexandre Campeau-Lecours, Véronique H Flamand, François Routhier, Jason Bouffard
{"title":"Social impact of the JACO wheelchair-mounted robotic arm on users and their caregivers.","authors":"Orthelo Léonel Gbètoho Atigossou, Julie Faieta, Maëlle Corcuff, Alexandre Campeau-Lecours, Véronique H Flamand, François Routhier, Jason Bouffard","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2477679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The efficacious implementation of robotic assistive technologies must be built on a thorough understanding of the experiences and perceptions of all concerned interest groups, particularly those of users and their caregivers. This study provides an in-depth insight into the experiences and perceptions of users of the JACO wheelchair-mounted robotic arm and those of their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Users of JACO (<i>n</i> = 21; Female: 6; Male: 15) and caregivers (<i>n</i> = 11; Female: 9; Male: 2) participated in individual interviews used to gain qualitative insight into the impact of JACO on their day-to-day lives. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive coding process. Thematic analysis was conducted in accordance with the <i>Consortium on Assistive Technology Outcomes Research</i> (CATOR) taxonomy. This article exclusively reports data on the social impact of the JACO wheelchair-mounted robotic arm. In addition, participants completed three questionnaires to gather more objective data for quantitative assessment. These included the <i>Caregiver Assistive Technology Outcome Measure</i> (CATOM), a sociodemographic questionnaire, and a home-based questionnaire to assess the social impact of using JACO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings pointed to highly varied experiences among participants, including instances of positive, negative, and absence of effects from the use of JACO. Participants' feedback fell within two broad categories, <i>Human Assistance,</i> and <i>Cost and Use of Resources</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides nuanced and varied insight into the spectrum of the social impact of using JACO as perceived by users and their caregivers, highlighting the importance of considering each user as an individual with unique experiences and needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2477679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:机器人辅助技术的有效实施必须建立在全面了解所有相关利益群体,尤其是用户及其护理人员的体验和看法的基础上。本研究深入探讨了 JACO 轮椅机械臂用户及其护理人员的体验和感知:方法: JACO 的用户(n = 21;女性:6;男性:15)和护理人员(n = 11;女性:9;男性:2)参加了个人访谈,以了解 JACO 对其日常生活的影响。访谈记录采用演绎-归纳混合编码流程进行分析。根据辅助技术成果研究联合会 (CATOR) 的分类标准进行了主题分析。本文专门报告了有关 JACO 轮椅机械臂社会影响的数据。此外,参与者还填写了三份问卷,以收集更多客观数据进行量化评估。这些问卷包括护理人员辅助技术成果测量(CATOM)、社会人口调查问卷和家庭调查问卷,以评估使用 JACO 的社会影响:研究结果表明,参与者的体验千差万别,包括使用 JACO 的积极、消极和无影响的情况。参与者的反馈分为两大类,即人力援助以及成本和资源使用:本研究提供了用户及其护理人员对使用 JACO 所产生的社会影响的细致入微的不同见解,强调了将每个用户视为具有独特经历和需求的个体的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social impact of the JACO wheelchair-mounted robotic arm on users and their caregivers.

Purpose: The efficacious implementation of robotic assistive technologies must be built on a thorough understanding of the experiences and perceptions of all concerned interest groups, particularly those of users and their caregivers. This study provides an in-depth insight into the experiences and perceptions of users of the JACO wheelchair-mounted robotic arm and those of their caregivers.

Methods: Users of JACO (n = 21; Female: 6; Male: 15) and caregivers (n = 11; Female: 9; Male: 2) participated in individual interviews used to gain qualitative insight into the impact of JACO on their day-to-day lives. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive coding process. Thematic analysis was conducted in accordance with the Consortium on Assistive Technology Outcomes Research (CATOR) taxonomy. This article exclusively reports data on the social impact of the JACO wheelchair-mounted robotic arm. In addition, participants completed three questionnaires to gather more objective data for quantitative assessment. These included the Caregiver Assistive Technology Outcome Measure (CATOM), a sociodemographic questionnaire, and a home-based questionnaire to assess the social impact of using JACO.

Results: Findings pointed to highly varied experiences among participants, including instances of positive, negative, and absence of effects from the use of JACO. Participants' feedback fell within two broad categories, Human Assistance, and Cost and Use of Resources.

Conclusion: This study provides nuanced and varied insight into the spectrum of the social impact of using JACO as perceived by users and their caregivers, highlighting the importance of considering each user as an individual with unique experiences and needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信