Chengwu Huang, U-Wai Lok, Jingke Zhang, Xiang Yang Zhu, James D Krier, Amy Stern, Kate M Knoll, Kendra Petersen, Kathryn A Robinson, Gina K Hesley, Andrew J Bentall, Thomas D Atwell, Andrew D Rule, Lilach O Lerman, Shigao Chen
{"title":"利用超声定位显微镜优化活体数据采集,实现稳健的临床微血管成像。","authors":"Chengwu Huang, U-Wai Lok, Jingke Zhang, Xiang Yang Zhu, James D Krier, Amy Stern, Kate M Knoll, Kendra Petersen, Kathryn A Robinson, Gina K Hesley, Andrew J Bentall, Thomas D Atwell, Andrew D Rule, Lilach O Lerman, Shigao Chen","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/adc0de","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) enables microvascular imaging at spatial resolutions beyond the acoustic diffraction limit, offering significant clinical potentials. However, ULM performance relies heavily on microbubble (MB) signal sparsity, the number of detected MBs, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), all of which vary in clinical scenarios involving bolus MB injections. These sources of variations underscore the need to optimize MB dosage, data acquisition timing, and imaging settings in order to standardize and optimize ULM of microvasculature. This pilot study aims to investigate the temporal changes in MB signals during bolus injections in both pig and human models to optimize data acquisition for clinical ULM.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Quantitative indices, mainly including individual MB SNR, normalized cross-correlation (NCC) of the MB signal with the point-spread function (PSF), and the number of localizable MBs, were developed to evaluate MB signal quality and guide the selection of acquisition timing. The effects of transmitted voltage and dosage on signal quality for MB localization were also explored.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>In both pig and human studies, MB localization quality (primarily indicated by NCC) reached a minimum at peak MB concentration, then improved as MB counts decreased during the wash-out phase. An optimal acquisition window was identified by balancing localization quality (empirically, NCC > 0.57) and MB concentration. In the pig model, a relatively short time window (approximately 10 seconds) for optimal acquisition was identified during the rapid wash-out phase, highlighting the need for real-time MB signal monitoring during data acquisition. The slower wash-out phase in humans allowed for a more flexible imaging window of 1-2 minutes, while trade-offs were observed between localization quality and MB density (or acquisition length) at different wash-out phase timings. Guided by these findings, robust ULM imaging was achieved in both pig and human kidneys using a short period of data acquisition (3.6 s and 9.6 s of data), demonstrating its feasibility in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study provides insights into optimizing data acquisition for consistent and reproducible ULM, paving the way for its standardization and broader clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing<i>in vivo</i>data acquisition for robust clinical microvascular imaging using ultrasound localization microscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Chengwu Huang, U-Wai Lok, Jingke Zhang, Xiang Yang Zhu, James D Krier, Amy Stern, Kate M Knoll, Kendra Petersen, Kathryn A Robinson, Gina K Hesley, Andrew J Bentall, Thomas D Atwell, Andrew D Rule, Lilach O Lerman, Shigao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/adc0de\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) enables microvascular imaging at spatial resolutions beyond the acoustic diffraction limit, offering significant clinical potentials. However, ULM performance relies heavily on microbubble (MB) signal sparsity, the number of detected MBs, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), all of which vary in clinical scenarios involving bolus MB injections. These sources of variations underscore the need to optimize MB dosage, data acquisition timing, and imaging settings in order to standardize and optimize ULM of microvasculature. This pilot study aims to investigate the temporal changes in MB signals during bolus injections in both pig and human models to optimize data acquisition for clinical ULM.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Quantitative indices, mainly including individual MB SNR, normalized cross-correlation (NCC) of the MB signal with the point-spread function (PSF), and the number of localizable MBs, were developed to evaluate MB signal quality and guide the selection of acquisition timing. The effects of transmitted voltage and dosage on signal quality for MB localization were also explored.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>In both pig and human studies, MB localization quality (primarily indicated by NCC) reached a minimum at peak MB concentration, then improved as MB counts decreased during the wash-out phase. An optimal acquisition window was identified by balancing localization quality (empirically, NCC > 0.57) and MB concentration. In the pig model, a relatively short time window (approximately 10 seconds) for optimal acquisition was identified during the rapid wash-out phase, highlighting the need for real-time MB signal monitoring during data acquisition. The slower wash-out phase in humans allowed for a more flexible imaging window of 1-2 minutes, while trade-offs were observed between localization quality and MB density (or acquisition length) at different wash-out phase timings. Guided by these findings, robust ULM imaging was achieved in both pig and human kidneys using a short period of data acquisition (3.6 s and 9.6 s of data), demonstrating its feasibility in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study provides insights into optimizing data acquisition for consistent and reproducible ULM, paving the way for its standardization and broader clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adc0de\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adc0de","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizingin vivodata acquisition for robust clinical microvascular imaging using ultrasound localization microscopy.
Objective: Ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) enables microvascular imaging at spatial resolutions beyond the acoustic diffraction limit, offering significant clinical potentials. However, ULM performance relies heavily on microbubble (MB) signal sparsity, the number of detected MBs, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), all of which vary in clinical scenarios involving bolus MB injections. These sources of variations underscore the need to optimize MB dosage, data acquisition timing, and imaging settings in order to standardize and optimize ULM of microvasculature. This pilot study aims to investigate the temporal changes in MB signals during bolus injections in both pig and human models to optimize data acquisition for clinical ULM.
Approach: Quantitative indices, mainly including individual MB SNR, normalized cross-correlation (NCC) of the MB signal with the point-spread function (PSF), and the number of localizable MBs, were developed to evaluate MB signal quality and guide the selection of acquisition timing. The effects of transmitted voltage and dosage on signal quality for MB localization were also explored.
Main results: In both pig and human studies, MB localization quality (primarily indicated by NCC) reached a minimum at peak MB concentration, then improved as MB counts decreased during the wash-out phase. An optimal acquisition window was identified by balancing localization quality (empirically, NCC > 0.57) and MB concentration. In the pig model, a relatively short time window (approximately 10 seconds) for optimal acquisition was identified during the rapid wash-out phase, highlighting the need for real-time MB signal monitoring during data acquisition. The slower wash-out phase in humans allowed for a more flexible imaging window of 1-2 minutes, while trade-offs were observed between localization quality and MB density (or acquisition length) at different wash-out phase timings. Guided by these findings, robust ULM imaging was achieved in both pig and human kidneys using a short period of data acquisition (3.6 s and 9.6 s of data), demonstrating its feasibility in clinical practice.
Significance: This study provides insights into optimizing data acquisition for consistent and reproducible ULM, paving the way for its standardization and broader clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry