肿瘤性结直肠手术后延长静脉血栓栓塞预防措施的临床效果。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Seana L Corbin, Larkin Harris, Ashlynn Fuccello, Jonathan Laryea, Mario Schootman, Bradley C Martin, Michail N Mavros
{"title":"肿瘤性结直肠手术后延长静脉血栓栓塞预防措施的临床效果。","authors":"Seana L Corbin, Larkin Harris, Ashlynn Fuccello, Jonathan Laryea, Mario Schootman, Bradley C Martin, Michail N Mavros","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current guidelines recommend extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after colorectal surgery for cancer, but adherence to these guidelines has been low. Moreover, its effectiveness has not been evaluated using real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed a random 25% sample of the 2009-2022 IQVIA Pharmetrics® Plus for Academics (IPPA) database, an administrative claims database representative of the commercially insured population of the United States. We selected cancer patients undergoing oncologic colorectal surgery. The primary outcomes were 90-day post-discharge VTE and bleeding events. The association of preoperative and intraoperative variables with the outcomes was assessed using univariate and multivariable main effects logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,117 surgeries were analyzed (35.0% laparoscopic colectomy, 33.4% open colectomy, 17.3% laparoscopic rectal resection, and 14.2% open rectal resection). The median age was 59 years and 52% were female. Extended VTE prophylaxis prescriptions were filled for 676 patients (5.2% of eligible patients), primarily with enoxaparin (95.5%), and increased over time (1.7% in 2010 to 12.0% in 2021). After risk adjustment, extended VTE prophylaxis was not associated with 90-day post-discharge VTE (OR 1.15; 95% Confidence Intervals 0.68-1.83) or bleeding [OR 0.93; 95% CI (0.63-1.33)]. The only factors independently associated with post-discharge VTE were the Elixhauser comorbidity score and surgery type.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Most patients undergoing colorectal surgery for cancer did not receive extended VTE prophylaxis. This did not appear to affect their risk of postoperative VTE or bleeding. Further research should focus on the patients most likely to benefit from extended VTE prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102018"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis, After Oncologic Colorectal Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Seana L Corbin, Larkin Harris, Ashlynn Fuccello, Jonathan Laryea, Mario Schootman, Bradley C Martin, Michail N Mavros\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current guidelines recommend extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after colorectal surgery for cancer, but adherence to these guidelines has been low. Moreover, its effectiveness has not been evaluated using real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed a random 25% sample of the 2009-2022 IQVIA Pharmetrics® Plus for Academics (IPPA) database, an administrative claims database representative of the commercially insured population of the United States. We selected cancer patients undergoing oncologic colorectal surgery. The primary outcomes were 90-day post-discharge VTE and bleeding events. The association of preoperative and intraoperative variables with the outcomes was assessed using univariate and multivariable main effects logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,117 surgeries were analyzed (35.0% laparoscopic colectomy, 33.4% open colectomy, 17.3% laparoscopic rectal resection, and 14.2% open rectal resection). The median age was 59 years and 52% were female. Extended VTE prophylaxis prescriptions were filled for 676 patients (5.2% of eligible patients), primarily with enoxaparin (95.5%), and increased over time (1.7% in 2010 to 12.0% in 2021). After risk adjustment, extended VTE prophylaxis was not associated with 90-day post-discharge VTE (OR 1.15; 95% Confidence Intervals 0.68-1.83) or bleeding [OR 0.93; 95% CI (0.63-1.33)]. The only factors independently associated with post-discharge VTE were the Elixhauser comorbidity score and surgery type.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Most patients undergoing colorectal surgery for cancer did not receive extended VTE prophylaxis. This did not appear to affect their risk of postoperative VTE or bleeding. Further research should focus on the patients most likely to benefit from extended VTE prophylaxis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Outcomes of Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis, After Oncologic Colorectal Surgery.

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after colorectal surgery for cancer, but adherence to these guidelines has been low. Moreover, its effectiveness has not been evaluated using real-world data.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a random 25% sample of the 2009-2022 IQVIA Pharmetrics® Plus for Academics (IPPA) database, an administrative claims database representative of the commercially insured population of the United States. We selected cancer patients undergoing oncologic colorectal surgery. The primary outcomes were 90-day post-discharge VTE and bleeding events. The association of preoperative and intraoperative variables with the outcomes was assessed using univariate and multivariable main effects logistic regression models.

Results: A total of 13,117 surgeries were analyzed (35.0% laparoscopic colectomy, 33.4% open colectomy, 17.3% laparoscopic rectal resection, and 14.2% open rectal resection). The median age was 59 years and 52% were female. Extended VTE prophylaxis prescriptions were filled for 676 patients (5.2% of eligible patients), primarily with enoxaparin (95.5%), and increased over time (1.7% in 2010 to 12.0% in 2021). After risk adjustment, extended VTE prophylaxis was not associated with 90-day post-discharge VTE (OR 1.15; 95% Confidence Intervals 0.68-1.83) or bleeding [OR 0.93; 95% CI (0.63-1.33)]. The only factors independently associated with post-discharge VTE were the Elixhauser comorbidity score and surgery type.

Discussion/conclusion: Most patients undergoing colorectal surgery for cancer did not receive extended VTE prophylaxis. This did not appear to affect their risk of postoperative VTE or bleeding. Further research should focus on the patients most likely to benefit from extended VTE prophylaxis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信