利用 Gd-EOB-DTPA 进行肝脏磁共振成像的肝胆相位图像评估方法的特点。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yasuo Takatsu, Shohei Harada, Yuya Yamatani, Kei Fukuzawa, Masafumi Nakamura, Kazuki Takano, Tosiaki Miyati
{"title":"利用 Gd-EOB-DTPA 进行肝脏磁共振成像的肝胆相位图像评估方法的特点。","authors":"Yasuo Takatsu, Shohei Harada, Yuya Yamatani, Kei Fukuzawa, Masafumi Nakamura, Kazuki Takano, Tosiaki Miyati","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2025.110382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to characterize quantitative liver-spleen contrast (Q-LSC) and hepatocellular uptake index (HUI) for evaluating hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images using gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in liver magnetic resonance imaging and to identify differences in the results obtain from these two measurement methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine consecutive randomly selected patients were assessed using the 3.0 T MR system. Three regions of interest (ROI) were set for the liver parenchyma and spleen, and signal intensity (SI) was averaged. Q-LSC (SI of the liver divided by the SI of the spleen) and HUI [(Q-LSC-1) × liver volume] were calculated. Moreover, the volume and mean SI of the whole liver and spleen, left lateral segment (LLS), and the other segments were calculated. Subsequently, ROI-based and volume-based values for Q-LSC (R-LSC and V-LSC) and HUI (R-HUI and V-HUI), and the whole and each segment were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>R-LSC and V-LSC for the whole and each segment were not significantly different. Conversely, all combinations of HUI, except between R-HUI and V-HUI were significantly different (P < 0.01), for the whole liver. Correlations between R-LSC, R-HUI, and volume-based LLS were lower than the others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Q-LSC and HUI were characterized through an imaging evaluation of HBP with Gd-EOB-DTPA. R-LSC and R-HUI, or V-HUI, of the whole liver were strongly correlated, but the LLS affected the data, and HUI depends on liver volume. R-LSC is simple and easy to use for partial image evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":" ","pages":"110382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of the evaluation method for hepatobiliary phase image by liver magnetic resonance imaging using Gd-EOB-DTPA.\",\"authors\":\"Yasuo Takatsu, Shohei Harada, Yuya Yamatani, Kei Fukuzawa, Masafumi Nakamura, Kazuki Takano, Tosiaki Miyati\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mri.2025.110382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to characterize quantitative liver-spleen contrast (Q-LSC) and hepatocellular uptake index (HUI) for evaluating hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images using gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in liver magnetic resonance imaging and to identify differences in the results obtain from these two measurement methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine consecutive randomly selected patients were assessed using the 3.0 T MR system. Three regions of interest (ROI) were set for the liver parenchyma and spleen, and signal intensity (SI) was averaged. Q-LSC (SI of the liver divided by the SI of the spleen) and HUI [(Q-LSC-1) × liver volume] were calculated. Moreover, the volume and mean SI of the whole liver and spleen, left lateral segment (LLS), and the other segments were calculated. Subsequently, ROI-based and volume-based values for Q-LSC (R-LSC and V-LSC) and HUI (R-HUI and V-HUI), and the whole and each segment were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>R-LSC and V-LSC for the whole and each segment were not significantly different. Conversely, all combinations of HUI, except between R-HUI and V-HUI were significantly different (P < 0.01), for the whole liver. Correlations between R-LSC, R-HUI, and volume-based LLS were lower than the others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Q-LSC and HUI were characterized through an imaging evaluation of HBP with Gd-EOB-DTPA. R-LSC and R-HUI, or V-HUI, of the whole liver were strongly correlated, but the LLS affected the data, and HUI depends on liver volume. R-LSC is simple and easy to use for partial image evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2025.110382\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2025.110382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of the evaluation method for hepatobiliary phase image by liver magnetic resonance imaging using Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Purpose: This study aimed to characterize quantitative liver-spleen contrast (Q-LSC) and hepatocellular uptake index (HUI) for evaluating hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images using gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in liver magnetic resonance imaging and to identify differences in the results obtain from these two measurement methods.

Methods: Twenty-nine consecutive randomly selected patients were assessed using the 3.0 T MR system. Three regions of interest (ROI) were set for the liver parenchyma and spleen, and signal intensity (SI) was averaged. Q-LSC (SI of the liver divided by the SI of the spleen) and HUI [(Q-LSC-1) × liver volume] were calculated. Moreover, the volume and mean SI of the whole liver and spleen, left lateral segment (LLS), and the other segments were calculated. Subsequently, ROI-based and volume-based values for Q-LSC (R-LSC and V-LSC) and HUI (R-HUI and V-HUI), and the whole and each segment were compared.

Results: R-LSC and V-LSC for the whole and each segment were not significantly different. Conversely, all combinations of HUI, except between R-HUI and V-HUI were significantly different (P < 0.01), for the whole liver. Correlations between R-LSC, R-HUI, and volume-based LLS were lower than the others.

Conclusion: Q-LSC and HUI were characterized through an imaging evaluation of HBP with Gd-EOB-DTPA. R-LSC and R-HUI, or V-HUI, of the whole liver were strongly correlated, but the LLS affected the data, and HUI depends on liver volume. R-LSC is simple and easy to use for partial image evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信