早期活动对危重患者谵妄发生率的预防作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Li Zhou, Fei Xie, Yangyang Zeng, Xi Xia, Rui Wang, Yongjie Cai, Yu Lei, Fengjiao Xu, Xi Li, Bing Chen
{"title":"早期活动对危重患者谵妄发生率的预防作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Li Zhou, Fei Xie, Yangyang Zeng, Xi Xia, Rui Wang, Yongjie Cai, Yu Lei, Fengjiao Xu, Xi Li, Bing Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00063-024-01243-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether early mobilisation can reduce the incidence of delirium in critically ill patients and to assess the methodological quality of published studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three electronic databases, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, were searched for relevant studies published up to 2 March 2024. Articles were screened independently by two reviewers, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software with a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 studies (intervention group: 1794 participants, control group: 2129 participants) were included in the systematic review, with 18 studies included in the meta-analysis. Early mobilisation was found to reduce the risk of delirium in critically ill populations, with a pooled odds ratio of 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.86; P = 0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 59%). Additionally, two studies found that early mobilisation did not change the duration of delirium in critically ill populations, with a pooled mean difference of -1.53 (95% CI -3.48 to 0.41; P = 0.12; I<sup>2</sup> = 37%). Subgroup analysis revealed that early mobilisation maintained its preventive effect on delirium in the before/after intervention studies, studies published before 2018 and studies with a moderate methodological rating.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a nonpharmacological intervention, early mobilisation may help reduce the risk of delirium and shorten its duration in critically ill patients compared with standard treatment and may potentially become a novel strategy for delirium prevention in future intensive care unit settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventive effects of early mobilisation on delirium incidence in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Li Zhou, Fei Xie, Yangyang Zeng, Xi Xia, Rui Wang, Yongjie Cai, Yu Lei, Fengjiao Xu, Xi Li, Bing Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00063-024-01243-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether early mobilisation can reduce the incidence of delirium in critically ill patients and to assess the methodological quality of published studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three electronic databases, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, were searched for relevant studies published up to 2 March 2024. Articles were screened independently by two reviewers, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software with a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 studies (intervention group: 1794 participants, control group: 2129 participants) were included in the systematic review, with 18 studies included in the meta-analysis. Early mobilisation was found to reduce the risk of delirium in critically ill populations, with a pooled odds ratio of 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.86; P = 0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 59%). Additionally, two studies found that early mobilisation did not change the duration of delirium in critically ill populations, with a pooled mean difference of -1.53 (95% CI -3.48 to 0.41; P = 0.12; I<sup>2</sup> = 37%). Subgroup analysis revealed that early mobilisation maintained its preventive effect on delirium in the before/after intervention studies, studies published before 2018 and studies with a moderate methodological rating.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a nonpharmacological intervention, early mobilisation may help reduce the risk of delirium and shorten its duration in critically ill patients compared with standard treatment and may potentially become a novel strategy for delirium prevention in future intensive care unit settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01243-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01243-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价早期活动是否能降低危重症患者谵妄的发生率,并评价已发表研究的方法学质量。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Library三个电子数据库,检索截止到2024年3月2日发表的相关研究。文章由两名审稿人根据纳入和排除标准独立筛选,使用RevMan 5.3软件进行meta分析,采用随机效应模型。结果:系统评价共纳入18项研究(干预组1794人,对照组2129人),meta分析纳入18项研究。发现早期活动可降低危重患者谵妄的风险,合并优势比为0.65(95%可信区间[CI] 0.49-0.86;P = 0.003;I2 = 59%)。此外,两项研究发现,早期活动不会改变危重患者谵妄持续时间,合并平均差异为-1.53 (95% CI -3.48至0.41;P = 0.12;I2 = 37%)。亚组分析显示,在干预前/后研究、2018年之前发表的研究和方法学评级中等的研究中,早期动员保持了对谵妄的预防作用。结论:作为一种非药物干预,与标准治疗相比,早期活动有助于降低危重患者谵妄的风险并缩短其持续时间,并可能成为未来重症监护病房预防谵妄的新策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preventive effects of early mobilisation on delirium incidence in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To evaluate whether early mobilisation can reduce the incidence of delirium in critically ill patients and to assess the methodological quality of published studies.

Methods: Three electronic databases, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, were searched for relevant studies published up to 2 March 2024. Articles were screened independently by two reviewers, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software with a random-effects model.

Results: A total of 18 studies (intervention group: 1794 participants, control group: 2129 participants) were included in the systematic review, with 18 studies included in the meta-analysis. Early mobilisation was found to reduce the risk of delirium in critically ill populations, with a pooled odds ratio of 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.86; P = 0.003; I2 = 59%). Additionally, two studies found that early mobilisation did not change the duration of delirium in critically ill populations, with a pooled mean difference of -1.53 (95% CI -3.48 to 0.41; P = 0.12; I2 = 37%). Subgroup analysis revealed that early mobilisation maintained its preventive effect on delirium in the before/after intervention studies, studies published before 2018 and studies with a moderate methodological rating.

Conclusion: As a nonpharmacological intervention, early mobilisation may help reduce the risk of delirium and shorten its duration in critically ill patients compared with standard treatment and may potentially become a novel strategy for delirium prevention in future intensive care unit settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信