Roussouly分级是否会影响腰椎退行性疾病中骨质减少或骨质疏松的椎体骨质量评分的诊断效率?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tong Su, Tong Meng, Kangcheng Zhao, Dianwen Song, Weibo Huang, Huabin Yin
{"title":"Roussouly分级是否会影响腰椎退行性疾病中骨质减少或骨质疏松的椎体骨质量评分的诊断效率?","authors":"Tong Su, Tong Meng, Kangcheng Zhao, Dianwen Song, Weibo Huang, Huabin Yin","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08760-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to estimate the diagnostic efficiency of VBQ score for assessing osteopenia and osteoporosis in different Roussouly types in lumbar degenerative disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the preoperative data of 501 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent lumbar spine surgery between July 2019 and December 2022 with available T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to analyze the diagnostic performance of VBQ score in different Roussouly classifications. For each Roussouly type, one-way ANOVA was applied to compare VBQ score across different lumbar segments. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical difference was found between the VBQ score of L1, L2, L3 and L4. Lumbar lordosis and sacral slope were not independently associated with VBQ score. According to the ROC curve, Roussouly type 1 to 4 showed AUC of 0.738, 0.799, 0.764 and 0.817, respectively, in diagnosing osteopenia. Roussouly type 1 to 4 showed AUC of 0.690, 0.703, 0.851 and 0.643, respectively, in diagnosing osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different Roussouly types would not affect the diagnosis efficiency of VBQ score in diagnosing osteopenia. However, VBQ score showed better performance in diagnosing osteoporosis for Roussouly type 3. When VBQ score was applied as opportunistic screening method for osteoporosis, choosing appropriate patients was important to improve the diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Would Roussouly classification affect the diagnostic efficiency of vertebral bone quality score for assessing osteopenia or osteoporosis in lumbar degenerative disease?\",\"authors\":\"Tong Su, Tong Meng, Kangcheng Zhao, Dianwen Song, Weibo Huang, Huabin Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-025-08760-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to estimate the diagnostic efficiency of VBQ score for assessing osteopenia and osteoporosis in different Roussouly types in lumbar degenerative disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the preoperative data of 501 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent lumbar spine surgery between July 2019 and December 2022 with available T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to analyze the diagnostic performance of VBQ score in different Roussouly classifications. For each Roussouly type, one-way ANOVA was applied to compare VBQ score across different lumbar segments. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical difference was found between the VBQ score of L1, L2, L3 and L4. Lumbar lordosis and sacral slope were not independently associated with VBQ score. According to the ROC curve, Roussouly type 1 to 4 showed AUC of 0.738, 0.799, 0.764 and 0.817, respectively, in diagnosing osteopenia. Roussouly type 1 to 4 showed AUC of 0.690, 0.703, 0.851 and 0.643, respectively, in diagnosing osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different Roussouly types would not affect the diagnosis efficiency of VBQ score in diagnosing osteopenia. However, VBQ score showed better performance in diagnosing osteoporosis for Roussouly type 3. When VBQ score was applied as opportunistic screening method for osteoporosis, choosing appropriate patients was important to improve the diagnostic accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08760-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08760-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在估算VBQ评分在评估不同Roussouly类型腰椎退行性疾病患者骨质疏松症和骨质疏松症方面的诊断效率:我们回顾了2019年7月至2022年12月期间接受腰椎手术的501名腰椎退行性疾病患者的术前数据,这些患者均接受了T1加权磁共振成像和双能X射线吸收测量。绘制了接收者操作特征曲线(ROC),以分析VBQ评分在不同Roussouly分类中的诊断性能。对于每种 Roussouly 类型,采用单因素方差分析比较不同腰椎节段的 VBQ 评分。统计显著性设定为 P 结果:L1、L2、L3 和 L4 的 VBQ 分数之间没有统计学差异。腰椎前凸和骶骨斜度与 VBQ 评分无独立相关性。根据 ROC 曲线,Roussouly 1 至 4 型在诊断骨质疏松症方面的 AUC 分别为 0.738、0.799、0.764 和 0.817。在诊断骨质疏松症方面,1 至 4 型 Roussouly 的 AUC 分别为 0.690、0.703、0.851 和 0.643:结论:不同Roussouly类型不会影响VBQ评分诊断骨质疏松症的效率。结论:不同的 Roussouly 类型不会影响 VBQ 评分对骨质疏松症的诊断效率,但 VBQ 评分对 Roussouly 3 型骨质疏松症的诊断效果更好。将 VBQ 评分作为骨质疏松症的机会性筛查方法时,选择合适的患者对提高诊断准确性非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Would Roussouly classification affect the diagnostic efficiency of vertebral bone quality score for assessing osteopenia or osteoporosis in lumbar degenerative disease?

Purpose: The aim of this study is to estimate the diagnostic efficiency of VBQ score for assessing osteopenia and osteoporosis in different Roussouly types in lumbar degenerative disease.

Methods: We reviewed the preoperative data of 501 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent lumbar spine surgery between July 2019 and December 2022 with available T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to analyze the diagnostic performance of VBQ score in different Roussouly classifications. For each Roussouly type, one-way ANOVA was applied to compare VBQ score across different lumbar segments. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: No statistical difference was found between the VBQ score of L1, L2, L3 and L4. Lumbar lordosis and sacral slope were not independently associated with VBQ score. According to the ROC curve, Roussouly type 1 to 4 showed AUC of 0.738, 0.799, 0.764 and 0.817, respectively, in diagnosing osteopenia. Roussouly type 1 to 4 showed AUC of 0.690, 0.703, 0.851 and 0.643, respectively, in diagnosing osteoporosis.

Conclusions: Different Roussouly types would not affect the diagnosis efficiency of VBQ score in diagnosing osteopenia. However, VBQ score showed better performance in diagnosing osteoporosis for Roussouly type 3. When VBQ score was applied as opportunistic screening method for osteoporosis, choosing appropriate patients was important to improve the diagnostic accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信