2014 - 2023年国内胱抑素C检测结果内部质控中间重现性不精确度的降低

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Zhixin Zhang, Jie Zeng, Wei Wang, Yuxuan Du, Shuai Yuan, Na Dong, Chuanbao Zhang, Zhiguo Wang
{"title":"2014 - 2023年国内胱抑素C检测结果内部质控中间重现性不精确度的降低","authors":"Zhixin Zhang, Jie Zeng, Wei Wang, Yuxuan Du, Shuai Yuan, Na Dong, Chuanbao Zhang, Zhiguo Wang","doi":"10.1177/00045632251329182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesWe evaluated the intermediate reproducibility imprecision of cystatin C results based on internal quality control (IQC) data.MethodsIQC data for cystatin C analyte were collected each year from 2014 to 2023. We used the coefficient of variation (CV) to evaluate the level of laboratory imprecision. Five performance specifications [1/3 total allowable error (TEa), 1/4TEa and three levels performance specifications based on biological variation] were used to calculate the proportion of laboratories with CVs less than or equal to the performance specifications, namely, the pass rate. Based on the reference interval of Chinese adult serum cystatin C (0.59-1.03 mg/L), the concentration of quality control materials was divided into two levels for CV analysis: Level 1 (≤1.03 mg/L) and Level 2 (>1.03 mg/L). Additionally, group analysis was conducted according to the reagent manufacturer. Peer groups were further divided based on instruments to study differences between instruments. Boxplots were drawn to analyze trends in CVs, and differences in CVs among different groups were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test.ResultsThe number of participating laboratories increased significantly from 255 in 2014 to 1814 in 2023. The intermediate reproducibility imprecision of Cystatin C IQC results in China had decreased from 5.1% (CV%) in 2014 to 3.3% in 2023. The pass rates based on 1/3 TEa showed upward trends increasing from 67% in 2014 to 88% in 2023. The pass rates for the other four performance specifications were all below 80%. The CVs of two concentration levels showed significant differences in most years. Roche Diagnostics reagent manufacturer exhibited low intermediate reproducibility imprecision. The BSBE-Abbott Architect series platform achieved a 100% pass rate based on 1/3 TEa in 2023.ConclusionsThe intermediate reproducibility imprecision of cystatin C has been a continuous overall improvement in China. However, the performance specifications of Cystatin C based on BV are currently not applicable to some laboratories in China. In addition, attention should be paid to the differences in intermediate reproducibility imprecision between various analysis systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"45632251329182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decrease in the internal quality control intermediate reproducibility imprecision of Cystatin C results in China in the years from 2014 to 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Zhixin Zhang, Jie Zeng, Wei Wang, Yuxuan Du, Shuai Yuan, Na Dong, Chuanbao Zhang, Zhiguo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632251329182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesWe evaluated the intermediate reproducibility imprecision of cystatin C results based on internal quality control (IQC) data.MethodsIQC data for cystatin C analyte were collected each year from 2014 to 2023. We used the coefficient of variation (CV) to evaluate the level of laboratory imprecision. Five performance specifications [1/3 total allowable error (TEa), 1/4TEa and three levels performance specifications based on biological variation] were used to calculate the proportion of laboratories with CVs less than or equal to the performance specifications, namely, the pass rate. Based on the reference interval of Chinese adult serum cystatin C (0.59-1.03 mg/L), the concentration of quality control materials was divided into two levels for CV analysis: Level 1 (≤1.03 mg/L) and Level 2 (>1.03 mg/L). Additionally, group analysis was conducted according to the reagent manufacturer. Peer groups were further divided based on instruments to study differences between instruments. Boxplots were drawn to analyze trends in CVs, and differences in CVs among different groups were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test.ResultsThe number of participating laboratories increased significantly from 255 in 2014 to 1814 in 2023. The intermediate reproducibility imprecision of Cystatin C IQC results in China had decreased from 5.1% (CV%) in 2014 to 3.3% in 2023. The pass rates based on 1/3 TEa showed upward trends increasing from 67% in 2014 to 88% in 2023. The pass rates for the other four performance specifications were all below 80%. The CVs of two concentration levels showed significant differences in most years. Roche Diagnostics reagent manufacturer exhibited low intermediate reproducibility imprecision. The BSBE-Abbott Architect series platform achieved a 100% pass rate based on 1/3 TEa in 2023.ConclusionsThe intermediate reproducibility imprecision of cystatin C has been a continuous overall improvement in China. However, the performance specifications of Cystatin C based on BV are currently not applicable to some laboratories in China. In addition, attention should be paid to the differences in intermediate reproducibility imprecision between various analysis systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"45632251329182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632251329182\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632251329182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价基于内部质控(IQC)数据的胱抑素C测定结果的中间重现性不精确性。方法:采用5种性能指标[1/3总允许误差(TEa)、1/4总允许误差(TEa)和基于生物变异的三级性能指标],计算cv小于或等于性能指标的实验室比例,即合格率。以中国成人血清胱抑素C参考区间(0.59 ~ 1.03 mg/L)为标准,将质控材料的浓度分为2个水平进行CV分析:1级(≤1.03 mg/L)和2级(≤1.03 mg/L)。并根据试剂生产厂家进行分组分析。根据不同的仪器进一步划分同侪组,研究不同仪器之间的差异。结果:国内胱抑素C IQC结果的中间重现性不精确度由2014年的5.1% (CV%)下降到2023年的3.3%。1/3 TEa的通过率呈上升趋势,从2014年的67%上升到2023年的88%。两种浓度水平的cv在大多数年份均存在显著差异。罗氏诊断试剂制造商表现出低中间可重复性不精确。BSBE-Abbott Architect系列平台在2023年实现了基于1/3 TEa的100%通过率。结论:国内胱抑素C的中间重现性不精确正在不断得到全面改善。然而,基于BV的胱抑素C的性能指标目前在国内部分实验室并不适用。此外,还应注意不同分析体系在中间重现性不精密度上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decrease in the internal quality control intermediate reproducibility imprecision of Cystatin C results in China in the years from 2014 to 2023.

ObjectivesWe evaluated the intermediate reproducibility imprecision of cystatin C results based on internal quality control (IQC) data.MethodsIQC data for cystatin C analyte were collected each year from 2014 to 2023. We used the coefficient of variation (CV) to evaluate the level of laboratory imprecision. Five performance specifications [1/3 total allowable error (TEa), 1/4TEa and three levels performance specifications based on biological variation] were used to calculate the proportion of laboratories with CVs less than or equal to the performance specifications, namely, the pass rate. Based on the reference interval of Chinese adult serum cystatin C (0.59-1.03 mg/L), the concentration of quality control materials was divided into two levels for CV analysis: Level 1 (≤1.03 mg/L) and Level 2 (>1.03 mg/L). Additionally, group analysis was conducted according to the reagent manufacturer. Peer groups were further divided based on instruments to study differences between instruments. Boxplots were drawn to analyze trends in CVs, and differences in CVs among different groups were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test.ResultsThe number of participating laboratories increased significantly from 255 in 2014 to 1814 in 2023. The intermediate reproducibility imprecision of Cystatin C IQC results in China had decreased from 5.1% (CV%) in 2014 to 3.3% in 2023. The pass rates based on 1/3 TEa showed upward trends increasing from 67% in 2014 to 88% in 2023. The pass rates for the other four performance specifications were all below 80%. The CVs of two concentration levels showed significant differences in most years. Roche Diagnostics reagent manufacturer exhibited low intermediate reproducibility imprecision. The BSBE-Abbott Architect series platform achieved a 100% pass rate based on 1/3 TEa in 2023.ConclusionsThe intermediate reproducibility imprecision of cystatin C has been a continuous overall improvement in China. However, the performance specifications of Cystatin C based on BV are currently not applicable to some laboratories in China. In addition, attention should be paid to the differences in intermediate reproducibility imprecision between various analysis systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信