心理教育干预对社区老年人配偶照顾者心理结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Ning Zhang , Yamei Bai , An Tao , Yayi Zhao , Helen Yue Lai Chan
{"title":"心理教育干预对社区老年人配偶照顾者心理结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Ning Zhang ,&nbsp;Yamei Bai ,&nbsp;An Tao ,&nbsp;Yayi Zhao ,&nbsp;Helen Yue Lai Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Spouses often assume the role of primary informal caregivers for ageing partners. Spousal caregivers are more likely than other family members to experience negative psychological outcomes due to their unique identities. However, little is known as to whether psychoeducation interventions can support them in the caregiving process.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To systematically identify and synthesise evidence regarding the effects of psychoeducation interventions on psychological outcomes among spousal caregivers of community-dwelling older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight electronic databases, including Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Chinese Journal Net and Wanfang were searched from inception to August 2024. Randomised controlled trials of psychoeducation interventions on psychological outcomes in spousal caregivers of older adults were included. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool v2. The certainty of the evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. Data synthesis methods, including meta-analysis and narrative synthesis, were conducted based on data availability. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model given the substantial heterogeneity in the intervention design and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were used to assess the robustness of the findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 18 reviewed studies, the overall risk of bias indicated that four had low risk, eight had some concerns, and six had high risk. The pooled analysis suggested that psychoeducation interventions had significant effects on improving marital satisfaction (SMD = 0.28, 95 % CI: 0.09 to 0.47; low certainty) and positive aspects of caregiving (SMD = 1.30, 95 % CI: 0.44 to 2.16; very low certainty). However, the effects on depressive symptoms, caregiving burden, anxiety, mental health, coping and self-efficacy were negligible. Narrative synthesis of evidence suggested potential beneficial effects on posttraumatic growth, family functioning, family relationship and life satisfaction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Psychoeducation interventions have potential to improve marital satisfaction and positive aspects of caregiving among spousal caregivers of older adults. However, the evidence has a low level of certainty with considerable variability in intervention design and outcome measures, indicating the need for further rigorous investigation. The non-significant effects on enhancing caregiving competence or alleviating negative psychological outcomes highlight the importance of exploring the specific needs and expectations of spousal caregivers.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>PROSPERO (CRD42024498599).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 105049"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of psychoeducation interventions on psychological outcomes among spousal caregivers of community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ning Zhang ,&nbsp;Yamei Bai ,&nbsp;An Tao ,&nbsp;Yayi Zhao ,&nbsp;Helen Yue Lai Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Spouses often assume the role of primary informal caregivers for ageing partners. Spousal caregivers are more likely than other family members to experience negative psychological outcomes due to their unique identities. However, little is known as to whether psychoeducation interventions can support them in the caregiving process.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To systematically identify and synthesise evidence regarding the effects of psychoeducation interventions on psychological outcomes among spousal caregivers of community-dwelling older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight electronic databases, including Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Chinese Journal Net and Wanfang were searched from inception to August 2024. Randomised controlled trials of psychoeducation interventions on psychological outcomes in spousal caregivers of older adults were included. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool v2. The certainty of the evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. Data synthesis methods, including meta-analysis and narrative synthesis, were conducted based on data availability. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model given the substantial heterogeneity in the intervention design and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were used to assess the robustness of the findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 18 reviewed studies, the overall risk of bias indicated that four had low risk, eight had some concerns, and six had high risk. The pooled analysis suggested that psychoeducation interventions had significant effects on improving marital satisfaction (SMD = 0.28, 95 % CI: 0.09 to 0.47; low certainty) and positive aspects of caregiving (SMD = 1.30, 95 % CI: 0.44 to 2.16; very low certainty). However, the effects on depressive symptoms, caregiving burden, anxiety, mental health, coping and self-efficacy were negligible. Narrative synthesis of evidence suggested potential beneficial effects on posttraumatic growth, family functioning, family relationship and life satisfaction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Psychoeducation interventions have potential to improve marital satisfaction and positive aspects of caregiving among spousal caregivers of older adults. However, the evidence has a low level of certainty with considerable variability in intervention design and outcome measures, indicating the need for further rigorous investigation. The non-significant effects on enhancing caregiving competence or alleviating negative psychological outcomes highlight the importance of exploring the specific needs and expectations of spousal caregivers.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>PROSPERO (CRD42024498599).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748925000586\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748925000586","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

配偶通常承担着老年伴侣的主要非正式照顾者的角色。配偶照顾者由于其独特的身份,比其他家庭成员更有可能经历负面的心理结果。然而,很少有人知道心理教育干预是否可以在照顾过程中支持他们。目的系统地识别和综合有关心理教育干预对社区老年人配偶照顾者心理结局影响的证据。设计系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法检索自建库至2024年8月的Cochrane Library、PubMed、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、Chinese Journal Net和万方等8个电子数据库。纳入了对老年人配偶照顾者心理结果的心理教育干预的随机对照试验。使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具v2评估证据质量。通过GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。基于数据可得性,采用meta分析、叙事综合等数据综合方法。考虑到干预设计和结果的异质性,采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。敏感性分析用于评估研究结果的稳健性。结果在18项被回顾的研究中,总体偏倚风险显示4项低风险,8项有一定关注,6项有高风险。综合分析显示,心理教育干预对提高婚姻满意度有显著影响(SMD = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.09 ~ 0.47;低确定性)和积极方面的护理(SMD = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.44至2.16;非常低的确定性)。然而,对抑郁症状、照顾负担、焦虑、心理健康、应对和自我效能的影响可以忽略不计。证据的叙述综合表明对创伤后成长、家庭功能、家庭关系和生活满意度有潜在的有益影响。结论心理教育干预有可能提高老年人配偶照顾者的婚姻满意度和照顾的积极方面。然而,证据的确定性较低,在干预设计和结果测量方面存在相当大的可变性,表明需要进一步严格的调查。对提高照顾能力或减轻负面心理结果的非显著影响突出了探索配偶照顾者的特定需求和期望的重要性。RegistrationPROSPERO (CRD42024498599)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of psychoeducation interventions on psychological outcomes among spousal caregivers of community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Spouses often assume the role of primary informal caregivers for ageing partners. Spousal caregivers are more likely than other family members to experience negative psychological outcomes due to their unique identities. However, little is known as to whether psychoeducation interventions can support them in the caregiving process.

Objectives

To systematically identify and synthesise evidence regarding the effects of psychoeducation interventions on psychological outcomes among spousal caregivers of community-dwelling older adults.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Eight electronic databases, including Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Chinese Journal Net and Wanfang were searched from inception to August 2024. Randomised controlled trials of psychoeducation interventions on psychological outcomes in spousal caregivers of older adults were included. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool v2. The certainty of the evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. Data synthesis methods, including meta-analysis and narrative synthesis, were conducted based on data availability. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model given the substantial heterogeneity in the intervention design and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were used to assess the robustness of the findings.

Results

Among the 18 reviewed studies, the overall risk of bias indicated that four had low risk, eight had some concerns, and six had high risk. The pooled analysis suggested that psychoeducation interventions had significant effects on improving marital satisfaction (SMD = 0.28, 95 % CI: 0.09 to 0.47; low certainty) and positive aspects of caregiving (SMD = 1.30, 95 % CI: 0.44 to 2.16; very low certainty). However, the effects on depressive symptoms, caregiving burden, anxiety, mental health, coping and self-efficacy were negligible. Narrative synthesis of evidence suggested potential beneficial effects on posttraumatic growth, family functioning, family relationship and life satisfaction.

Conclusions

Psychoeducation interventions have potential to improve marital satisfaction and positive aspects of caregiving among spousal caregivers of older adults. However, the evidence has a low level of certainty with considerable variability in intervention design and outcome measures, indicating the need for further rigorous investigation. The non-significant effects on enhancing caregiving competence or alleviating negative psychological outcomes highlight the importance of exploring the specific needs and expectations of spousal caregivers.

Registration

PROSPERO (CRD42024498599).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信