改进审计和反馈:以用户为中心的方法来设计在线实验的反馈技术。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1177/14604582251317101
Valentine Seymour, Thomas A Willis, Ana Weller, Mohamed Althaf, Jill J Francis, Fabiana Lorencatto, Alexandra Wright-Hughes, Rebecca E A Walwyn, Sarah L Alderson, Benjamin C Brown, Jamie Brehaut, Heather Colquhoun, Noah Ivers, Justin Presseau, Amanda J Farrin, Robbie Foy, Stephanie Wilson
{"title":"改进审计和反馈:以用户为中心的方法来设计在线实验的反馈技术。","authors":"Valentine Seymour, Thomas A Willis, Ana Weller, Mohamed Althaf, Jill J Francis, Fabiana Lorencatto, Alexandra Wright-Hughes, Rebecca E A Walwyn, Sarah L Alderson, Benjamin C Brown, Jamie Brehaut, Heather Colquhoun, Noah Ivers, Justin Presseau, Amanda J Farrin, Robbie Foy, Stephanie Wilson","doi":"10.1177/14604582251317101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Audit and feedback (A&F) programmes aim to improve patient care by providing summary data on performance to clinicians. They generally have modest, but variable, effects on patient care and questions remain about how best to provide performance feedback. It is not feasible to test all ways of providing feedback in 'real-world' randomised trials. Online screening experiments that screen feedback techniques prior to real-world evaluations of optimised versions offer a systematic approach. User-centred design methodologies can inform the design of such online experiments. <b>Methods:</b> We report the use of an innovative user-centred design approach to create feedback techniques for an online screening experiment and reflect on its usefulness. This approach included the involvement of patients and stakeholders. <b>Results and Conclusion:</b> We highlight lessons on ways to engage with partners, considering the feasibility of online A&F feedback delivery, fidelity, and usability. We demonstrate how the approach was implemented to co-create a set of feedback techniques for an online experiment and could also be applied to the design of other digital interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"14604582251317101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving audit and feedback: A user-centred approach to designing feedback techniques for an online experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Valentine Seymour, Thomas A Willis, Ana Weller, Mohamed Althaf, Jill J Francis, Fabiana Lorencatto, Alexandra Wright-Hughes, Rebecca E A Walwyn, Sarah L Alderson, Benjamin C Brown, Jamie Brehaut, Heather Colquhoun, Noah Ivers, Justin Presseau, Amanda J Farrin, Robbie Foy, Stephanie Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14604582251317101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Audit and feedback (A&F) programmes aim to improve patient care by providing summary data on performance to clinicians. They generally have modest, but variable, effects on patient care and questions remain about how best to provide performance feedback. It is not feasible to test all ways of providing feedback in 'real-world' randomised trials. Online screening experiments that screen feedback techniques prior to real-world evaluations of optimised versions offer a systematic approach. User-centred design methodologies can inform the design of such online experiments. <b>Methods:</b> We report the use of an innovative user-centred design approach to create feedback techniques for an online screening experiment and reflect on its usefulness. This approach included the involvement of patients and stakeholders. <b>Results and Conclusion:</b> We highlight lessons on ways to engage with partners, considering the feasibility of online A&F feedback delivery, fidelity, and usability. We demonstrate how the approach was implemented to co-create a set of feedback techniques for an online experiment and could also be applied to the design of other digital interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"14604582251317101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251317101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251317101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:审计和反馈(A&F)项目旨在通过向临床医生提供绩效总结数据来改善患者护理。它们通常对病人护理的影响不大,但变化不定,如何最好地提供绩效反馈仍是一个问题。在“真实世界”的随机试验中测试所有提供反馈的方法是不可行的。在线筛选实验,筛选反馈技术之前的实际评估优化版本提供了一个系统的方法。以用户为中心的设计方法可以为这种在线实验的设计提供信息。方法:我们报告使用一种创新的以用户为中心的设计方法来创建在线筛选实验的反馈技术,并反映其有用性。这种方法包括患者和利益相关者的参与。结果和结论:考虑到在线A&F反馈交付的可行性、保真度和可用性,我们强调了与合作伙伴互动的方式。我们演示了如何实施该方法,为在线实验共同创建一套反馈技术,并可应用于其他数字干预措施的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving audit and feedback: A user-centred approach to designing feedback techniques for an online experiment.

Objective: Audit and feedback (A&F) programmes aim to improve patient care by providing summary data on performance to clinicians. They generally have modest, but variable, effects on patient care and questions remain about how best to provide performance feedback. It is not feasible to test all ways of providing feedback in 'real-world' randomised trials. Online screening experiments that screen feedback techniques prior to real-world evaluations of optimised versions offer a systematic approach. User-centred design methodologies can inform the design of such online experiments. Methods: We report the use of an innovative user-centred design approach to create feedback techniques for an online screening experiment and reflect on its usefulness. This approach included the involvement of patients and stakeholders. Results and Conclusion: We highlight lessons on ways to engage with partners, considering the feasibility of online A&F feedback delivery, fidelity, and usability. We demonstrate how the approach was implemented to co-create a set of feedback techniques for an online experiment and could also be applied to the design of other digital interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信