鉴定海洋沉积物中驱动牛磺酸和蛋氨酸有机硫循环的活性微生物。

IF 5.1 Q1 ECOLOGY
ISME communications Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ismeco/ycaf033
Ömer K Coskun, William D Orsi, Steven D'Hondt, Gonzalo V Gomez-Saez
{"title":"鉴定海洋沉积物中驱动牛磺酸和蛋氨酸有机硫循环的活性微生物。","authors":"Ömer K Coskun, William D Orsi, Steven D'Hondt, Gonzalo V Gomez-Saez","doi":"10.1093/ismeco/ycaf033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies on microbial sulfur cycling in marine sediment have primarily centered on the cycling of inorganic sulfur. The microbial diversity underlying the cycling of organosulfur compounds is largely unexplored. In this study, we present the first quantification of dissolved organic sulfur (DOS) microbial assimilation in marine surface sediments using <sup>13</sup>C-DOS quantitative DNA stable isotope probing (qSIP). We sampled marine sediment from 493 m water depth on the Puerto Rico continental slope, measured <sup>13</sup>C-assimilation from two DOS substrates (<sup>13</sup>C-taurine and <sup>13</sup>C-methionine), and compared the <sup>13</sup>C-DOS assimilation to <sup>13</sup>C-glucose uptake. Taurine utilization was confined to bacteria, whereas methionine was degraded by bacteria and archaea, including methanogenic <i>Methanococcoides</i>. Globally widespread uncultivated clades of Gammaproteobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria were the main drivers of DOS cycling and exhibited increased assimilation of carbon from taurine and methionine, compared to glucose. Only one operational taxonomic unit (OTU) affiliated with <i>Neptuniibacter</i> was found to assimilate taurine and methionine, but not glucose, implying that microbes exclusively utilizing both DOS substrates as a carbon source in marine sediments are rare. Still, a substantial number of bacterial taxa exhibited a higher assimilation of <sup>13</sup>C from taurine or methionine, compared to glucose, indicating their preference for both DOS substrates over glucose as a carbon source in the sediment. These results represent the first quantitative assessment of organosulfur cycling from taurine and methionine by uncultivated microbes in a marine benthic environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":73516,"journal":{"name":"ISME communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"ycaf033"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying the active microbes driving organosulfur cycling from taurine and methionine in marine sediment.\",\"authors\":\"Ömer K Coskun, William D Orsi, Steven D'Hondt, Gonzalo V Gomez-Saez\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ismeco/ycaf033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies on microbial sulfur cycling in marine sediment have primarily centered on the cycling of inorganic sulfur. The microbial diversity underlying the cycling of organosulfur compounds is largely unexplored. In this study, we present the first quantification of dissolved organic sulfur (DOS) microbial assimilation in marine surface sediments using <sup>13</sup>C-DOS quantitative DNA stable isotope probing (qSIP). We sampled marine sediment from 493 m water depth on the Puerto Rico continental slope, measured <sup>13</sup>C-assimilation from two DOS substrates (<sup>13</sup>C-taurine and <sup>13</sup>C-methionine), and compared the <sup>13</sup>C-DOS assimilation to <sup>13</sup>C-glucose uptake. Taurine utilization was confined to bacteria, whereas methionine was degraded by bacteria and archaea, including methanogenic <i>Methanococcoides</i>. Globally widespread uncultivated clades of Gammaproteobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria were the main drivers of DOS cycling and exhibited increased assimilation of carbon from taurine and methionine, compared to glucose. Only one operational taxonomic unit (OTU) affiliated with <i>Neptuniibacter</i> was found to assimilate taurine and methionine, but not glucose, implying that microbes exclusively utilizing both DOS substrates as a carbon source in marine sediments are rare. Still, a substantial number of bacterial taxa exhibited a higher assimilation of <sup>13</sup>C from taurine or methionine, compared to glucose, indicating their preference for both DOS substrates over glucose as a carbon source in the sediment. These results represent the first quantitative assessment of organosulfur cycling from taurine and methionine by uncultivated microbes in a marine benthic environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISME communications\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"ycaf033\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISME communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycaf033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISME communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycaf033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海洋沉积物中微生物硫循环的研究主要集中在无机硫的循环上。有机硫化合物循环背后的微生物多样性在很大程度上尚未被探索。在这项研究中,我们首次采用13C-DOS定量DNA稳定同位素探测(qSIP)方法定量测定了海洋表层沉积物中溶解有机硫(DOS)的微生物同化。我们从波多黎各大陆坡493米水深的海洋沉积物中取样,测量了两种DOS底物(13c -牛磺酸和13c -蛋氨酸)的13C-DOS同化,并将13C-DOS同化与13c -葡萄糖摄取进行了比较。牛磺酸的利用仅限于细菌,而蛋氨酸则被细菌和古细菌(包括产甲烷的甲烷球菌)降解。全球广泛分布的γ变形菌门和三角洲变形菌门是DOS循环的主要驱动力,与葡萄糖相比,它们对牛磺酸和蛋氨酸碳的吸收增加。研究发现,只有一个与Neptuniibacter相关的操作分类单位(OTU)能够吸收牛磺酸和蛋氨酸,但不吸收葡萄糖,这意味着在海洋沉积物中专门利用这两种DOS底物作为碳源的微生物是罕见的。尽管如此,与葡萄糖相比,相当数量的细菌类群表现出更高的牛磺酸或蛋氨酸对13C的同化,表明它们更喜欢这两种DOS底物,而不是葡萄糖作为沉积物中的碳源。这些结果代表了海洋底栖环境中未经培养的微生物从牛磺酸和蛋氨酸中循环有机硫的首次定量评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying the active microbes driving organosulfur cycling from taurine and methionine in marine sediment.

Studies on microbial sulfur cycling in marine sediment have primarily centered on the cycling of inorganic sulfur. The microbial diversity underlying the cycling of organosulfur compounds is largely unexplored. In this study, we present the first quantification of dissolved organic sulfur (DOS) microbial assimilation in marine surface sediments using 13C-DOS quantitative DNA stable isotope probing (qSIP). We sampled marine sediment from 493 m water depth on the Puerto Rico continental slope, measured 13C-assimilation from two DOS substrates (13C-taurine and 13C-methionine), and compared the 13C-DOS assimilation to 13C-glucose uptake. Taurine utilization was confined to bacteria, whereas methionine was degraded by bacteria and archaea, including methanogenic Methanococcoides. Globally widespread uncultivated clades of Gammaproteobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria were the main drivers of DOS cycling and exhibited increased assimilation of carbon from taurine and methionine, compared to glucose. Only one operational taxonomic unit (OTU) affiliated with Neptuniibacter was found to assimilate taurine and methionine, but not glucose, implying that microbes exclusively utilizing both DOS substrates as a carbon source in marine sediments are rare. Still, a substantial number of bacterial taxa exhibited a higher assimilation of 13C from taurine or methionine, compared to glucose, indicating their preference for both DOS substrates over glucose as a carbon source in the sediment. These results represent the first quantitative assessment of organosulfur cycling from taurine and methionine by uncultivated microbes in a marine benthic environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信