门诊研究机构远程医疗项目评估。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Adrienne Barrett, Susan Alexander, Jeffery Sano
{"title":"门诊研究机构远程医疗项目评估。","authors":"Adrienne Barrett, Susan Alexander, Jeffery Sano","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic diseases globally contribute to heightened rates of morbidity and mortality. Telehealth is a viable approach to managing chronic illness. In response to the coronavirus pandemic, a research facility implemented telehealth in April 2020 to continue research activities. A telehealth program evaluation was needed to explore the facility's strengths and improvement opportunities. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Framework for Program Evaluation guided the evaluation to determine whether telehealth implementation improved care access, efficiency, and provider experiences. Missed and canceled visits, visit duration, and wait times between April 2020 and June 2023 were analyzed for those 19 years and older with chronic illnesses identified by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. Provider experiences were measured with the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire. The facility transitioned from Microsoft Teams® to a telehealth platform in March 2023, offering more robust data. Analyses revealed improved completed visits, decreased patient abandoned visits, and varied canceled and duration percentages. Providers missed visits less frequently than patients. Run charts for telehealth total visits versus chronic visits did not reveal special cause variations. Provider experiences were favorable except for telehealth reliability and interface quality. Recommendations include continued user training, evaluating patients' experiences, exploring telehealth's impact on research participant recruitment, and standardizing evaluation processes through policy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50694,"journal":{"name":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of an Outpatient Research Facility Telehealth Program.\",\"authors\":\"Adrienne Barrett, Susan Alexander, Jeffery Sano\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic diseases globally contribute to heightened rates of morbidity and mortality. Telehealth is a viable approach to managing chronic illness. In response to the coronavirus pandemic, a research facility implemented telehealth in April 2020 to continue research activities. A telehealth program evaluation was needed to explore the facility's strengths and improvement opportunities. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Framework for Program Evaluation guided the evaluation to determine whether telehealth implementation improved care access, efficiency, and provider experiences. Missed and canceled visits, visit duration, and wait times between April 2020 and June 2023 were analyzed for those 19 years and older with chronic illnesses identified by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. Provider experiences were measured with the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire. The facility transitioned from Microsoft Teams® to a telehealth platform in March 2023, offering more robust data. Analyses revealed improved completed visits, decreased patient abandoned visits, and varied canceled and duration percentages. Providers missed visits less frequently than patients. Run charts for telehealth total visits versus chronic visits did not reveal special cause variations. Provider experiences were favorable except for telehealth reliability and interface quality. Recommendations include continued user training, evaluating patients' experiences, exploring telehealth's impact on research participant recruitment, and standardizing evaluation processes through policy development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001284\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球慢性疾病导致发病率和死亡率上升。远程保健是管理慢性病的一种可行办法。为应对冠状病毒大流行,一个研究机构于2020年4月实施了远程医疗,以继续开展研究活动。需要对远程保健方案进行评估,以探索该设施的优势和改进机会。疾病控制和预防中心的项目评估框架指导了评估,以确定远程医疗的实施是否改善了医疗服务的获取、效率和提供者的经验。对2020年4月至2023年6月期间患有国际疾病分类第10次修订代码确定的慢性疾病的19岁及以上患者的错过和取消就诊、就诊持续时间和等待时间进行了分析。使用远程医疗可用性问卷来衡量提供者的经验。该设施于2023年3月从Microsoft Teams®过渡到远程医疗平台,提供更强大的数据。分析显示,完成的就诊次数有所增加,患者放弃的就诊次数减少,取消和持续时间的百分比有所不同。医生比病人更少错过就诊。远程医疗总访问量与慢性访问量的运行图表没有显示特殊原因的差异。除了远程医疗的可靠性和接口质量外,提供者的经验是有利的。建议包括继续进行用户培训,评估患者经验,探索远程保健对研究参与者招募的影响,以及通过制定政策使评估过程标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of an Outpatient Research Facility Telehealth Program.

Chronic diseases globally contribute to heightened rates of morbidity and mortality. Telehealth is a viable approach to managing chronic illness. In response to the coronavirus pandemic, a research facility implemented telehealth in April 2020 to continue research activities. A telehealth program evaluation was needed to explore the facility's strengths and improvement opportunities. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Framework for Program Evaluation guided the evaluation to determine whether telehealth implementation improved care access, efficiency, and provider experiences. Missed and canceled visits, visit duration, and wait times between April 2020 and June 2023 were analyzed for those 19 years and older with chronic illnesses identified by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. Provider experiences were measured with the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire. The facility transitioned from Microsoft Teams® to a telehealth platform in March 2023, offering more robust data. Analyses revealed improved completed visits, decreased patient abandoned visits, and varied canceled and duration percentages. Providers missed visits less frequently than patients. Run charts for telehealth total visits versus chronic visits did not reveal special cause variations. Provider experiences were favorable except for telehealth reliability and interface quality. Recommendations include continued user training, evaluating patients' experiences, exploring telehealth's impact on research participant recruitment, and standardizing evaluation processes through policy development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing 工程技术-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing has been at the interface of the science of information and the art of nursing, publishing articles on the latest developments in nursing informatics, research, education and administrative of health information technology. CIN connects you with colleagues as they share knowledge on implementation of electronic health records systems, design decision-support systems, incorporate evidence-based healthcare in practice, explore point-of-care computing in practice and education, and conceptually integrate nursing languages and standard data sets. Continuing education contact hours are available in every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信