远程医疗对肝硬化患者提供者责任和相关结果的影响:一项单中心回顾性研究

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lauren Bloomberg, Paul Hong, Corrin Hepburn, Austin Kaboff, Michael Fayad, Bianca Varda, Cara Joyce, Scott Cotler, Jonah Rubin
{"title":"远程医疗对肝硬化患者提供者责任和相关结果的影响:一项单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Lauren Bloomberg, Paul Hong, Corrin Hepburn, Austin Kaboff, Michael Fayad, Bianca Varda, Cara Joyce, Scott Cotler, Jonah Rubin","doi":"10.1177/1357633X251323185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundStudies show satisfaction with telemedicine, but there is limited data regarding changes in provider practices and clinical outcomes. We sought to evaluate the impact of telehealth on patient-provider communications between visits and clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsSingle-center retrospective study of cirrhotic patients seen outpatient in 2019 and 2020 was conducted. Clinical characteristics, provider practices, and clinical outcomes were obtained. Provider practices included medication adjustments, labs ordered, and patient communication. Clinical outcomes included ED visits, hospitalizations, and mortality.ResultsTotally, 1395 patients were included with a mean age of 61, 51% female, and 73% Caucasian. The median baseline model for end-stage liver disease (MELD-Na) score was 10. During 2019 there were no telehealth visits. In 2020, 37% of clinic visits were telehealth and 64% of patients had at least one telehealth visit. The rate of medication changes significantly decreased in 2020. There was no significant difference in number of clinic visits, labs ordered, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, or intensive care unit (ICU) stays between 2019 and 2020. In 2020, the rate of telephone contacts and patient messages significantly increased. Compared to 2019, the odds of death were 2.6 times higher in 2020.ConclusionWhen a majority of cirrhotic patients had a telehealth visit, patients had similar rates of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and ICU stays, but a higher rate of mortality compared to patients with in-person visits. Telehealth was associated with more patient contact between visits, increasing communication demands on providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X251323185"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in provider responsibilities and associated outcomes for cirrhotic patients with telehealth: A single-center, retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Bloomberg, Paul Hong, Corrin Hepburn, Austin Kaboff, Michael Fayad, Bianca Varda, Cara Joyce, Scott Cotler, Jonah Rubin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1357633X251323185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundStudies show satisfaction with telemedicine, but there is limited data regarding changes in provider practices and clinical outcomes. We sought to evaluate the impact of telehealth on patient-provider communications between visits and clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsSingle-center retrospective study of cirrhotic patients seen outpatient in 2019 and 2020 was conducted. Clinical characteristics, provider practices, and clinical outcomes were obtained. Provider practices included medication adjustments, labs ordered, and patient communication. Clinical outcomes included ED visits, hospitalizations, and mortality.ResultsTotally, 1395 patients were included with a mean age of 61, 51% female, and 73% Caucasian. The median baseline model for end-stage liver disease (MELD-Na) score was 10. During 2019 there were no telehealth visits. In 2020, 37% of clinic visits were telehealth and 64% of patients had at least one telehealth visit. The rate of medication changes significantly decreased in 2020. There was no significant difference in number of clinic visits, labs ordered, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, or intensive care unit (ICU) stays between 2019 and 2020. In 2020, the rate of telephone contacts and patient messages significantly increased. Compared to 2019, the odds of death were 2.6 times higher in 2020.ConclusionWhen a majority of cirrhotic patients had a telehealth visit, patients had similar rates of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and ICU stays, but a higher rate of mortality compared to patients with in-person visits. Telehealth was associated with more patient contact between visits, increasing communication demands on providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1357633X251323185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X251323185\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X251323185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明人们对远程医疗感到满意,但关于提供者实践和临床结果变化的数据有限。我们试图评估远程医疗对COVID-19大流行期间肝硬化患者就诊之间的医患沟通和临床结果的影响。方法对2019年和2020年肝硬化门诊患者进行单中心回顾性研究。获得临床特征、提供者实践和临床结果。提供者的做法包括药物调整、实验室安排和患者沟通。临床结果包括急诊科就诊、住院和死亡率。结果共纳入1395例患者,平均年龄61岁,女性占51%,白人占73%。终末期肝病基线模型(MELD-Na)评分中位数为10分。2019年期间,没有进行远程医疗访问。2020年,37%的诊所就诊是远程医疗,64%的患者至少有一次远程医疗就诊。2020年用药变化率明显下降。在2019年和2020年之间,门诊就诊次数、实验室预约次数、急诊科就诊次数、住院次数或重症监护病房(ICU)住院次数没有显著差异。2020年,电话联系率和患者短信率显著提高。与2019年相比,2020年的死亡几率高出2.6倍。结论:当大多数肝硬化患者进行远程医疗访问时,患者的急诊科就诊率、住院率和ICU住院率相似,但与亲自就诊的患者相比,死亡率更高。远程保健与两次就诊之间患者接触更多有关,增加了对提供者的通信需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in provider responsibilities and associated outcomes for cirrhotic patients with telehealth: A single-center, retrospective study.

BackgroundStudies show satisfaction with telemedicine, but there is limited data regarding changes in provider practices and clinical outcomes. We sought to evaluate the impact of telehealth on patient-provider communications between visits and clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsSingle-center retrospective study of cirrhotic patients seen outpatient in 2019 and 2020 was conducted. Clinical characteristics, provider practices, and clinical outcomes were obtained. Provider practices included medication adjustments, labs ordered, and patient communication. Clinical outcomes included ED visits, hospitalizations, and mortality.ResultsTotally, 1395 patients were included with a mean age of 61, 51% female, and 73% Caucasian. The median baseline model for end-stage liver disease (MELD-Na) score was 10. During 2019 there were no telehealth visits. In 2020, 37% of clinic visits were telehealth and 64% of patients had at least one telehealth visit. The rate of medication changes significantly decreased in 2020. There was no significant difference in number of clinic visits, labs ordered, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, or intensive care unit (ICU) stays between 2019 and 2020. In 2020, the rate of telephone contacts and patient messages significantly increased. Compared to 2019, the odds of death were 2.6 times higher in 2020.ConclusionWhen a majority of cirrhotic patients had a telehealth visit, patients had similar rates of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and ICU stays, but a higher rate of mortality compared to patients with in-person visits. Telehealth was associated with more patient contact between visits, increasing communication demands on providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信