患者和临床医生对从初级保健的临床记录中自动提取健康的社会驱动因素的接受程度。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Serena Jinchen Xie, Carolin Spice, Patrick Wedgeworth, Raina Langevin, Kevin Lybarger, Angad Preet Singh, Brian R Wood, Jared W Klein, Gary Hsieh, Herbert C Duber, Andrea L Hartzler
{"title":"患者和临床医生对从初级保健的临床记录中自动提取健康的社会驱动因素的接受程度。","authors":"Serena Jinchen Xie, Carolin Spice, Patrick Wedgeworth, Raina Langevin, Kevin Lybarger, Angad Preet Singh, Brian R Wood, Jared W Klein, Gary Hsieh, Herbert C Duber, Andrea L Hartzler","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based approaches for extracting Social Drivers of Health (SDoH) from clinical notes offer healthcare systems an efficient way to identify patients' social needs, yet we know little about the acceptability of this approach to patients and clinicians. We investigated patient and clinician acceptability through interviews.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We interviewed primary care patients experiencing social needs (n = 19) and clinicians (n = 14) about their acceptability of \"SDoH autosuggest,\" an AI-based approach for extracting SDoH from clinical notes. We presented storyboards depicting the approach and asked participants to rate their acceptability and discuss their rationale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants rated SDoH autosuggest moderately acceptable (mean = 3.9/5 patients; mean = 3.6/5 clinicians). Patients' ratings varied across domains, with substance use rated most and employment rated least acceptable. Both groups raised concern about information integrity, actionability, impact on clinical interactions and relationships, and privacy. In addition, patients raised concern about transparency, autonomy, and potential harm, whereas clinicians raised concern about usability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite reporting moderate acceptability of the envisioned approach, patients and clinicians expressed multiple concerns about AI systems that extract SDoH. Participants emphasized the need for high-quality data, non-intrusive presentation methods, and clear communication strategies regarding sensitive social needs. Findings underscore the importance of engaging patients and clinicians to mitigate unintended consequences when integrating AI approaches into care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although AI approaches like SDoH autosuggest hold promise for efficiently identifying SDoH from clinical notes, they must also account for concerns of patients and clinicians to ensure these systems are acceptable and do not undermine trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":"855-865"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and clinician acceptability of automated extraction of social drivers of health from clinical notes in primary care.\",\"authors\":\"Serena Jinchen Xie, Carolin Spice, Patrick Wedgeworth, Raina Langevin, Kevin Lybarger, Angad Preet Singh, Brian R Wood, Jared W Klein, Gary Hsieh, Herbert C Duber, Andrea L Hartzler\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocaf046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based approaches for extracting Social Drivers of Health (SDoH) from clinical notes offer healthcare systems an efficient way to identify patients' social needs, yet we know little about the acceptability of this approach to patients and clinicians. We investigated patient and clinician acceptability through interviews.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We interviewed primary care patients experiencing social needs (n = 19) and clinicians (n = 14) about their acceptability of \\\"SDoH autosuggest,\\\" an AI-based approach for extracting SDoH from clinical notes. We presented storyboards depicting the approach and asked participants to rate their acceptability and discuss their rationale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants rated SDoH autosuggest moderately acceptable (mean = 3.9/5 patients; mean = 3.6/5 clinicians). Patients' ratings varied across domains, with substance use rated most and employment rated least acceptable. Both groups raised concern about information integrity, actionability, impact on clinical interactions and relationships, and privacy. In addition, patients raised concern about transparency, autonomy, and potential harm, whereas clinicians raised concern about usability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite reporting moderate acceptability of the envisioned approach, patients and clinicians expressed multiple concerns about AI systems that extract SDoH. Participants emphasized the need for high-quality data, non-intrusive presentation methods, and clear communication strategies regarding sensitive social needs. Findings underscore the importance of engaging patients and clinicians to mitigate unintended consequences when integrating AI approaches into care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although AI approaches like SDoH autosuggest hold promise for efficiently identifying SDoH from clinical notes, they must also account for concerns of patients and clinicians to ensure these systems are acceptable and do not undermine trust.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"855-865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012364/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基于人工智能(AI)的方法从临床记录中提取健康的社会驱动因素(SDoH),为医疗保健系统识别患者的社会需求提供了一种有效的方法,但我们对患者和临床医生对这种方法的可接受性知之甚少。我们通过访谈调查了患者和临床医生的可接受性。材料和方法:我们采访了有社会需求的初级保健患者(n = 19)和临床医生(n = 14),了解他们对“SDoH自动建议”的接受程度,这是一种基于人工智能的方法,用于从临床记录中提取SDoH。我们展示了描述方法的故事板,并要求参与者评价他们的可接受性并讨论他们的基本原理。结果:被评估为SDoH的参与者自我建议中度可接受(平均= 3.9/5例;平均= 3.6/5名临床医生)。患者的评分因领域而异,药物使用评分最高,就业评分最低。两组都提出了对信息完整性、可操作性、临床互动和关系的影响以及隐私的关注。此外,患者提出了对透明度、自主性和潜在危害的担忧,而临床医生则提出了对可用性的担忧。讨论:尽管报告对设想的方法有一定程度的可接受性,但患者和临床医生对提取SDoH的人工智能系统表达了多种担忧。与会者强调需要高质量的数据、非侵入性的表示方法和关于敏感的社会需求的明确的沟通策略。研究结果强调了在将人工智能方法纳入护理时,让患者和临床医生参与进来以减轻意外后果的重要性。结论:尽管像SDoH自动建议这样的人工智能方法有望有效地从临床记录中识别SDoH,但它们也必须考虑到患者和临床医生的担忧,以确保这些系统是可接受的,不会破坏信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient and clinician acceptability of automated extraction of social drivers of health from clinical notes in primary care.

Objective: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based approaches for extracting Social Drivers of Health (SDoH) from clinical notes offer healthcare systems an efficient way to identify patients' social needs, yet we know little about the acceptability of this approach to patients and clinicians. We investigated patient and clinician acceptability through interviews.

Materials and methods: We interviewed primary care patients experiencing social needs (n = 19) and clinicians (n = 14) about their acceptability of "SDoH autosuggest," an AI-based approach for extracting SDoH from clinical notes. We presented storyboards depicting the approach and asked participants to rate their acceptability and discuss their rationale.

Results: Participants rated SDoH autosuggest moderately acceptable (mean = 3.9/5 patients; mean = 3.6/5 clinicians). Patients' ratings varied across domains, with substance use rated most and employment rated least acceptable. Both groups raised concern about information integrity, actionability, impact on clinical interactions and relationships, and privacy. In addition, patients raised concern about transparency, autonomy, and potential harm, whereas clinicians raised concern about usability.

Discussion: Despite reporting moderate acceptability of the envisioned approach, patients and clinicians expressed multiple concerns about AI systems that extract SDoH. Participants emphasized the need for high-quality data, non-intrusive presentation methods, and clear communication strategies regarding sensitive social needs. Findings underscore the importance of engaging patients and clinicians to mitigate unintended consequences when integrating AI approaches into care.

Conclusion: Although AI approaches like SDoH autosuggest hold promise for efficiently identifying SDoH from clinical notes, they must also account for concerns of patients and clinicians to ensure these systems are acceptable and do not undermine trust.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信