{"title":"iSPOT:建立和实施国家同伴观察和反馈计划。","authors":"Erin King, Nicole Webb, Joanne Nazif, Cherie Ginwalla, Priti Bhansali","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2024-008104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Peer observation and feedback (POF) enables clinicians to observe one another and learn concrete strategies for improvement. In a 2019 national study, pediatric hospitalists endorsed a desire for POF. We describe a national POF faculty development program designed to formalize, standardize, and normalize POF in pediatric hospital medicine (PHM), along with lessons learned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants and site leads were recruited via the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Hospital Medicine listserv and offered maintenance of certification (MOC) part 4 credit. Participants submitted a self-assessment with personal goals and attended webinars during which education was provided and data reviewed. Participants completed at least 2 observations in a calendar year. Site leaders collected data and implemented interventions to increase POF events. Baseline and quarterly data were collected for 12 months and subsequently 6 months post implementation. Data presented include site characteristics, facilitators of project completion, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POF events increased by 149% from the overall baseline and improvement was sustained by 6 sites. Twenty of 21 sites achieved one Specific/Measurable/Achievable/Relevant/Time Bound aim. Self-reported confidence in delivering feedback and measures of peer connection improved significantly. Seventy-four percent of enrollees completed the program and 92% recommended ongoing participation. One hundred percent of site leads responding to a postprogram survey were satisfied with the program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A national MOC program for faculty development through POF provided incentives and infrastructure to increase POF across diverse institutions. This program serves as a model for other national collaboratives in education and faculty development initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e148-e153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"iSPOT: Creation and Implementation of a National Peer Observation and Feedback Program.\",\"authors\":\"Erin King, Nicole Webb, Joanne Nazif, Cherie Ginwalla, Priti Bhansali\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/hpeds.2024-008104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Peer observation and feedback (POF) enables clinicians to observe one another and learn concrete strategies for improvement. In a 2019 national study, pediatric hospitalists endorsed a desire for POF. We describe a national POF faculty development program designed to formalize, standardize, and normalize POF in pediatric hospital medicine (PHM), along with lessons learned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants and site leads were recruited via the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Hospital Medicine listserv and offered maintenance of certification (MOC) part 4 credit. Participants submitted a self-assessment with personal goals and attended webinars during which education was provided and data reviewed. Participants completed at least 2 observations in a calendar year. Site leaders collected data and implemented interventions to increase POF events. Baseline and quarterly data were collected for 12 months and subsequently 6 months post implementation. Data presented include site characteristics, facilitators of project completion, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POF events increased by 149% from the overall baseline and improvement was sustained by 6 sites. Twenty of 21 sites achieved one Specific/Measurable/Achievable/Relevant/Time Bound aim. Self-reported confidence in delivering feedback and measures of peer connection improved significantly. Seventy-four percent of enrollees completed the program and 92% recommended ongoing participation. One hundred percent of site leads responding to a postprogram survey were satisfied with the program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A national MOC program for faculty development through POF provided incentives and infrastructure to increase POF across diverse institutions. This program serves as a model for other national collaboratives in education and faculty development initiatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e148-e153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-008104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-008104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
iSPOT: Creation and Implementation of a National Peer Observation and Feedback Program.
Background and objectives: Peer observation and feedback (POF) enables clinicians to observe one another and learn concrete strategies for improvement. In a 2019 national study, pediatric hospitalists endorsed a desire for POF. We describe a national POF faculty development program designed to formalize, standardize, and normalize POF in pediatric hospital medicine (PHM), along with lessons learned.
Methods: Participants and site leads were recruited via the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Hospital Medicine listserv and offered maintenance of certification (MOC) part 4 credit. Participants submitted a self-assessment with personal goals and attended webinars during which education was provided and data reviewed. Participants completed at least 2 observations in a calendar year. Site leaders collected data and implemented interventions to increase POF events. Baseline and quarterly data were collected for 12 months and subsequently 6 months post implementation. Data presented include site characteristics, facilitators of project completion, and outcomes.
Results: POF events increased by 149% from the overall baseline and improvement was sustained by 6 sites. Twenty of 21 sites achieved one Specific/Measurable/Achievable/Relevant/Time Bound aim. Self-reported confidence in delivering feedback and measures of peer connection improved significantly. Seventy-four percent of enrollees completed the program and 92% recommended ongoing participation. One hundred percent of site leads responding to a postprogram survey were satisfied with the program.
Conclusions: A national MOC program for faculty development through POF provided incentives and infrastructure to increase POF across diverse institutions. This program serves as a model for other national collaboratives in education and faculty development initiatives.