儿科心脏手术设置中的家庭存在:临床医生的定性研究,一个关键的利益相关者群体。

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Zoel A Quiñónez, Kimberly A Pyke-Grimm, Shreya K Kamra, Kate E Holmes, Danton Char
{"title":"儿科心脏手术设置中的家庭存在:临床医生的定性研究,一个关键的利益相关者群体。","authors":"Zoel A Quiñónez, Kimberly A Pyke-Grimm, Shreya K Kamra, Kate E Holmes, Danton Char","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2025.2474918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With increased emphasis on healthcare transparency, parents are increasingly asking to be present for procedures performed on their children, especially in high-acuity contexts like care of children with congenital heart disease (CHD), where procedures may inform critical care decisions. In addition, observations of complex care may better communicate clinical knowledge and benefit grieving after adverse events. We examined clinicians' views on current family presence (FP) efforts and on the expansion of FP to include the observation of operative procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and content analysis within a pediatric heart center. Participants included perioperative and ICU nurses, physicians, advanced practice providers, and child life specialists. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty provider interviews were conducted; 70% had less than 10 years of experience, with 30% having between 10 and 20 years; 50% were physicians who work in procedural environments; 25% were nurses; 15% were advanced practice providers; 10% were child-life specialists. Four categories emerged: (1) positive impact of FP, (2) negative impact of FP, (3) limitations to achieving FP, and (4) policies and procedures for FP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants reported that current FP uses reduce patient anxiety and improve patient safety, family understanding of clinical decisions, and coping. Drawbacks include parental interference in care, lack of protocols to guide FP, increased family/staff anxiety, lack of staff resources to support FP, and potential access limitations for diverse populations. Participants anticipated that these problems would occur with the expansion to intraoperative FP.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Presence in Pediatric Cardiac Procedural Settings: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians, A Key Stakeholder Group.\",\"authors\":\"Zoel A Quiñónez, Kimberly A Pyke-Grimm, Shreya K Kamra, Kate E Holmes, Danton Char\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23294515.2025.2474918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With increased emphasis on healthcare transparency, parents are increasingly asking to be present for procedures performed on their children, especially in high-acuity contexts like care of children with congenital heart disease (CHD), where procedures may inform critical care decisions. In addition, observations of complex care may better communicate clinical knowledge and benefit grieving after adverse events. We examined clinicians' views on current family presence (FP) efforts and on the expansion of FP to include the observation of operative procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and content analysis within a pediatric heart center. Participants included perioperative and ICU nurses, physicians, advanced practice providers, and child life specialists. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty provider interviews were conducted; 70% had less than 10 years of experience, with 30% having between 10 and 20 years; 50% were physicians who work in procedural environments; 25% were nurses; 15% were advanced practice providers; 10% were child-life specialists. Four categories emerged: (1) positive impact of FP, (2) negative impact of FP, (3) limitations to achieving FP, and (4) policies and procedures for FP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants reported that current FP uses reduce patient anxiety and improve patient safety, family understanding of clinical decisions, and coping. Drawbacks include parental interference in care, lack of protocols to guide FP, increased family/staff anxiety, lack of staff resources to support FP, and potential access limitations for diverse populations. Participants anticipated that these problems would occur with the expansion to intraoperative FP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOB Empirical Bioethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOB Empirical Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2025.2474918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2025.2474918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着对医疗透明度的日益重视,父母越来越多地要求在对孩子进行手术时在场,特别是在高敏度的情况下,如先天性心脏病(CHD)患儿的护理,在这种情况下,手术可能会影响关键的护理决策。此外,观察复杂的护理可以更好地交流临床知识,并有利于不良事件后的悲伤。我们研究了临床医生对当前家庭在场(FP)工作的看法,以及将FP扩展到包括手术过程的观察。方法:这是一项定性研究,采用半结构化访谈和内容分析在儿童心脏中心。参与者包括围手术期和ICU护士、内科医生、高级实践提供者和儿童生活专家。访谈记录,转录,并使用归纳内容分析分析。结果:共进行了20次提供者访谈;70%的人工作经验不足10年,30%的人工作经验在10到20年之间;50%是在程序性环境中工作的医生;25%是护士;15%为高级执业医师;10%是儿童生活专家。出现了四个类别:(1)计划生育的积极影响,(2)计划生育的消极影响,(3)实现计划生育的限制,以及(4)计划生育的政策和程序。结论:参与者报告了目前计划生育的使用减少了患者的焦虑,提高了患者的安全性,家属对临床决定的理解和应对能力。缺点包括父母干预护理、缺乏指导计划生育的协议、家庭/工作人员焦虑增加、缺乏支持计划生育的工作人员资源以及不同人群的潜在获取限制。与会者预计这些问题将随着术中FP的扩展而发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family Presence in Pediatric Cardiac Procedural Settings: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians, A Key Stakeholder Group.

Background: With increased emphasis on healthcare transparency, parents are increasingly asking to be present for procedures performed on their children, especially in high-acuity contexts like care of children with congenital heart disease (CHD), where procedures may inform critical care decisions. In addition, observations of complex care may better communicate clinical knowledge and benefit grieving after adverse events. We examined clinicians' views on current family presence (FP) efforts and on the expansion of FP to include the observation of operative procedures.

Methods: This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and content analysis within a pediatric heart center. Participants included perioperative and ICU nurses, physicians, advanced practice providers, and child life specialists. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive content analysis.

Results: Twenty provider interviews were conducted; 70% had less than 10 years of experience, with 30% having between 10 and 20 years; 50% were physicians who work in procedural environments; 25% were nurses; 15% were advanced practice providers; 10% were child-life specialists. Four categories emerged: (1) positive impact of FP, (2) negative impact of FP, (3) limitations to achieving FP, and (4) policies and procedures for FP.

Conclusion: Participants reported that current FP uses reduce patient anxiety and improve patient safety, family understanding of clinical decisions, and coping. Drawbacks include parental interference in care, lack of protocols to guide FP, increased family/staff anxiety, lack of staff resources to support FP, and potential access limitations for diverse populations. Participants anticipated that these problems would occur with the expansion to intraoperative FP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信