IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1177/17085381251327171
Rianne E van Rijswijk, Suzan R T Everink, Jelmer M Wolterink, Michel M P J Reijnen, Erik Groot Jebbink
{"title":"Feasibility of tomographic freehand three-dimensional ultrasound for surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular repair.","authors":"Rianne E van Rijswijk, Suzan R T Everink, Jelmer M Wolterink, Michel M P J Reijnen, Erik Groot Jebbink","doi":"10.1177/17085381251327171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a commercially available tomographic freehand three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) system for surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) after endovascular repair (EVAR).MethodsIn 10 patients who underwent EVAR, a 3D-US scan was obtained post-operatively in addition to regular computed tomography angiography (CTA). Five independent observers evaluated 12 EVAR surveillance parameters for the 10 scans, resulting in a total of 600 individual observations.ResultsThe diameters of the neck, sac and iliac arteries were evaluable in most of the observations (neck: 80%, AAA sac: 98%, right CIA: 90%, left CIA: 68%). The diameter measurements of the 3D-US strongly correlated with the diameters measured on CTA (<i>ρ</i> = 0.90, <i>p</i> < .001). The general offset of 3D-US compared to CTA was -4.4 mm and the proportional bias was 3%. For all observers, the diameter measurements were significantly strongly correlated (O1:ρ = 0.85, O2:ρ = 0.88, O3:ρ = 0.93, O4:ρ = 0.96, O5:ρ = 0.86, <i>p</i> < .001 for all). The inter-observer reliability was excellent with an overall concordance correlation coefficient of 0.98. The start of the endograft, the lowest renal artery, the distance between these landmarks, and the proximal and distal sealing zones were evaluable in fewer than half of the observations (42%, 12%, 10%, 32%, 32%, 26%).Conclusion3D-US after EVAR is feasible. Diameters measured in 3D-US correlate strongly with CTA-based diameters and have a good interrater variability. However, the sealing zones are difficult to assess on 3D-US. This technique could be a useful addition to duplex ultrasound to facilitate offline 3D analysis, increase measurement reproducibility, enable volume measurements, and minimise the use of harmful CTA for surveillance after EVAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"17085381251327171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251327171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 在 10 例接受 EVAR 的患者中,除了常规的计算机断层扫描血管造影术 (CTA),术后还进行了 3D-US 扫描。结果在大多数观察中,颈部、囊部和髂动脉的直径均可评估(颈部:80%;AAA 囊部:98%;右侧 CIA:90%;左侧 CIA:68%)。3D-US 测量的直径与 CTA 测量的直径密切相关(ρ = 0.90,p < .001)。与 CTA 相比,3D-US 的总体偏移量为-4.4 毫米,比例偏差为 3%。对所有观察者而言,直径测量结果都有明显的强相关性(O1:ρ = 0.85、O2:ρ = 0.88、O3:ρ = 0.93、O4:ρ = 0.96、O5:ρ = 0.86,所有数据的相关性均为 p <.001)。观察者之间的可靠性极佳,总体一致性相关系数为 0.98。在不到一半的观察中(42%、12%、10%、32%、32%、26%),内移植物的起点、最低的肾动脉、这些地标之间的距离以及近端和远端密封区是可以评估的。3D-US测量的直径与CTA测量的直径密切相关,并且具有良好的互变性。然而,3D-US 难以评估密封区。这项技术可以作为双工超声的有益补充,促进离线三维分析,提高测量的可重复性,实现容积测量,并最大限度地减少在EVAR术后监测中使用有害的CTA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of tomographic freehand three-dimensional ultrasound for surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular repair.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a commercially available tomographic freehand three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) system for surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) after endovascular repair (EVAR).MethodsIn 10 patients who underwent EVAR, a 3D-US scan was obtained post-operatively in addition to regular computed tomography angiography (CTA). Five independent observers evaluated 12 EVAR surveillance parameters for the 10 scans, resulting in a total of 600 individual observations.ResultsThe diameters of the neck, sac and iliac arteries were evaluable in most of the observations (neck: 80%, AAA sac: 98%, right CIA: 90%, left CIA: 68%). The diameter measurements of the 3D-US strongly correlated with the diameters measured on CTA (ρ = 0.90, p < .001). The general offset of 3D-US compared to CTA was -4.4 mm and the proportional bias was 3%. For all observers, the diameter measurements were significantly strongly correlated (O1:ρ = 0.85, O2:ρ = 0.88, O3:ρ = 0.93, O4:ρ = 0.96, O5:ρ = 0.86, p < .001 for all). The inter-observer reliability was excellent with an overall concordance correlation coefficient of 0.98. The start of the endograft, the lowest renal artery, the distance between these landmarks, and the proximal and distal sealing zones were evaluable in fewer than half of the observations (42%, 12%, 10%, 32%, 32%, 26%).Conclusion3D-US after EVAR is feasible. Diameters measured in 3D-US correlate strongly with CTA-based diameters and have a good interrater variability. However, the sealing zones are difficult to assess on 3D-US. This technique could be a useful addition to duplex ultrasound to facilitate offline 3D analysis, increase measurement reproducibility, enable volume measurements, and minimise the use of harmful CTA for surveillance after EVAR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信