在成人临床试验中影响青少年和年轻人(AYA)纳入障碍的安全工具包的开发。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Devona Williams, Julie Maidment, Pamela Concepcion, Gyorgy Zorenyi
{"title":"在成人临床试验中影响青少年和年轻人(AYA)纳入障碍的安全工具包的开发。","authors":"Devona Williams, Julie Maidment, Pamela Concepcion, Gyorgy Zorenyi","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00761-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lack of long-term safety data for the AYA population has been identified as a key area that reduces enrolment of AYA in adult oncology clinical trials. Here we describe a potential safety assessment solution, from a pharmacovigilance and clinical patient safety perspective, to enhance the inclusion of adolescents into adult oncology trials. To help bridge gaps in safety data that limit AYA participation, a Patient Safety Oncology Toolkit for AYA patients has been developed. The safety toolkit includes recommended additional clinical study protocol templated wording for assessment and management of general AYA-related risks for oncology agents, including infertility, growth and development, new primary malignancies, and neurocognitive effects. There is also recommended language to incorporate into the study protocol for investigational product specific risk considerations based on impacted organ systems. Using the safety toolkit, a key deliverable from the evaluation of the risks is the generation of a safety go, or no-go, Red-Amber-Green (RAG) rating for each study. The RAG rating scale is intended to summarize the scope and severity of any specific treatment-related safety concerns and helps standardize company governance and investment decisions. This toolkit is intended to allow teams to safely include AYA individuals in adult oncology studies and allow this population better access to life-changing medicines.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"418-425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Safety Toolkit to Influence Inclusion Barriers for Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) in Adult Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Devona Williams, Julie Maidment, Pamela Concepcion, Gyorgy Zorenyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43441-025-00761-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lack of long-term safety data for the AYA population has been identified as a key area that reduces enrolment of AYA in adult oncology clinical trials. Here we describe a potential safety assessment solution, from a pharmacovigilance and clinical patient safety perspective, to enhance the inclusion of adolescents into adult oncology trials. To help bridge gaps in safety data that limit AYA participation, a Patient Safety Oncology Toolkit for AYA patients has been developed. The safety toolkit includes recommended additional clinical study protocol templated wording for assessment and management of general AYA-related risks for oncology agents, including infertility, growth and development, new primary malignancies, and neurocognitive effects. There is also recommended language to incorporate into the study protocol for investigational product specific risk considerations based on impacted organ systems. Using the safety toolkit, a key deliverable from the evaluation of the risks is the generation of a safety go, or no-go, Red-Amber-Green (RAG) rating for each study. The RAG rating scale is intended to summarize the scope and severity of any specific treatment-related safety concerns and helps standardize company governance and investment decisions. This toolkit is intended to allow teams to safely include AYA individuals in adult oncology studies and allow this population better access to life-changing medicines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"418-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018608/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00761-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00761-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

缺乏AYA人群的长期安全性数据已被确定为减少AYA在成人肿瘤临床试验中入组的关键领域。在这里,我们从药物警戒和临床患者安全的角度描述了一种潜在的安全性评估解决方案,以加强将青少年纳入成人肿瘤试验。为了帮助弥合限制AYA参与的安全数据差距,为AYA患者开发了患者安全肿瘤学工具包。安全性工具包包括推荐的额外临床研究方案模板化措辞,用于评估和管理肿瘤药物的一般aya相关风险,包括不孕症、生长发育、新发原发性恶性肿瘤和神经认知效应。此外,还建议将基于受影响器官系统的研究产品特定风险考虑纳入研究方案。使用安全工具包,风险评估的一个关键成果是为每个研究生成一个安全进行或不进行的红-琥珀-绿(RAG)评级。RAG评级量表旨在总结任何特定治疗相关安全问题的范围和严重程度,并有助于标准化公司治理和投资决策。该工具包旨在允许团队安全地将AYA个体纳入成人肿瘤学研究,并允许这些人群更好地获得改变生活的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Safety Toolkit to Influence Inclusion Barriers for Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) in Adult Clinical Trials.

Lack of long-term safety data for the AYA population has been identified as a key area that reduces enrolment of AYA in adult oncology clinical trials. Here we describe a potential safety assessment solution, from a pharmacovigilance and clinical patient safety perspective, to enhance the inclusion of adolescents into adult oncology trials. To help bridge gaps in safety data that limit AYA participation, a Patient Safety Oncology Toolkit for AYA patients has been developed. The safety toolkit includes recommended additional clinical study protocol templated wording for assessment and management of general AYA-related risks for oncology agents, including infertility, growth and development, new primary malignancies, and neurocognitive effects. There is also recommended language to incorporate into the study protocol for investigational product specific risk considerations based on impacted organ systems. Using the safety toolkit, a key deliverable from the evaluation of the risks is the generation of a safety go, or no-go, Red-Amber-Green (RAG) rating for each study. The RAG rating scale is intended to summarize the scope and severity of any specific treatment-related safety concerns and helps standardize company governance and investment decisions. This toolkit is intended to allow teams to safely include AYA individuals in adult oncology studies and allow this population better access to life-changing medicines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信