Q4 Medicine
H Shafeeq Ahmed, Sneha Reddy Pulkurthi, Akhil Fravis Dias, Bethineedi Lakshmi Deepak, Prekshitha Mohan R
{"title":"Bar Dislocation after Pectus Excavatum Repair: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors, Stabilization Techniques, and Management Strategies.","authors":"H Shafeeq Ahmed, Sneha Reddy Pulkurthi, Akhil Fravis Dias, Bethineedi Lakshmi Deepak, Prekshitha Mohan R","doi":"10.5090/jcs.24.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pectus excavatum (PE), the most common congenital chest wall deformity, is increasingly treated with minimally invasive repair (MIRPE). However, postoperative complications such as bar displacement remain a significant challenge, occurring in approximately 9.5% of cases. While surgical modifications and stabilization techniques aim to reduce risks, bar displacement persists as a critical concern.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This PROSPERO-registered systematic review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A search of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL through October 2024 identified studies evaluating bar displacement in PE patients undergoing MIRPE or alternative surgical approaches. The inclusion criteria focused on risk factors, stabilization techniques, and reoperation strategies. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments were independently conducted by multiple reviewers to ensure accuracy and quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies spanning 23 years were included. Bar displacement rates varied widely (0.9%-33.3%), with key risk factors including patient age, chest wall rigidity, bar length, and placement technique. Advanced stabilization methods-such as bridge fixation, shorter bars, multipoint fixation, and adjunct stabilizers-significantly reduced displacement rates. Common postoperative complications included wound infections, seromas, pleural effusions, and bar re-dislocation. Imaging modalities like chest X-rays and 3-dimensional computed tomography scans proved critical for early detection. Heterogeneity in stabilization approaches underscores a shift toward patient-specific strategies to optimize outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tailored stabilization techniques are essential for successful PE correction. Although advancements in fixation methods have reduced displacement risks, standardized postoperative protocols and multicenter studies are needed to validate these innovations and improve long-term outcomes (PROSPERO: CRD42024595337).</p>","PeriodicalId":34499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chest Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chest Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/jcs.24.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:开胸(PE)是最常见的先天性胸壁畸形,越来越多的患者采用微创修复术(MIRPE)进行治疗。然而,术后并发症(如横杠移位)仍是一项重大挑战,约有 9.5% 的病例会出现这种并发症。虽然手术改良和稳定技术旨在降低风险,但横杠移位仍是一个关键问题:这项在 PROSPERO 注册的系统性综述遵循了 PRISMA(系统性综述和 Meta 分析首选报告项目)指南。截至 2024 年 10 月,在 PubMed、Scopus 和 CINAHL 中进行了检索,确定了对接受 MIRPE 或其他手术方法的 PE 患者的横杠移位进行评估的研究。纳入标准侧重于风险因素、稳定技术和再手术策略。数据提取和偏倚风险评估由多名审稿人独立完成,以确保准确性和质量:共纳入 13 项研究,时间跨度长达 23 年。横杠移位率差异很大(0.9%-33.3%),主要风险因素包括患者年龄、胸壁刚度、横杠长度和放置技术。先进的稳定方法,如桥式固定、较短的横杠、多点固定和辅助稳定器,可显著降低移位率。常见的术后并发症包括伤口感染、血清瘤、胸腔积液和横杆再次脱位。胸部X光和三维计算机断层扫描等成像模式对早期发现至关重要。稳定方法的异质性突出表明,应转向针对患者的策略,以优化治疗效果:结论:量身定制的稳定技术对于成功矫正 PE 至关重要。尽管固定方法的进步降低了移位风险,但仍需要标准化的术后方案和多中心研究来验证这些创新并改善长期预后(PROSPERO: CRD42024595337)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bar Dislocation after Pectus Excavatum Repair: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors, Stabilization Techniques, and Management Strategies.

Background: Pectus excavatum (PE), the most common congenital chest wall deformity, is increasingly treated with minimally invasive repair (MIRPE). However, postoperative complications such as bar displacement remain a significant challenge, occurring in approximately 9.5% of cases. While surgical modifications and stabilization techniques aim to reduce risks, bar displacement persists as a critical concern.

Methods: This PROSPERO-registered systematic review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A search of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL through October 2024 identified studies evaluating bar displacement in PE patients undergoing MIRPE or alternative surgical approaches. The inclusion criteria focused on risk factors, stabilization techniques, and reoperation strategies. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments were independently conducted by multiple reviewers to ensure accuracy and quality.

Results: Thirteen studies spanning 23 years were included. Bar displacement rates varied widely (0.9%-33.3%), with key risk factors including patient age, chest wall rigidity, bar length, and placement technique. Advanced stabilization methods-such as bridge fixation, shorter bars, multipoint fixation, and adjunct stabilizers-significantly reduced displacement rates. Common postoperative complications included wound infections, seromas, pleural effusions, and bar re-dislocation. Imaging modalities like chest X-rays and 3-dimensional computed tomography scans proved critical for early detection. Heterogeneity in stabilization approaches underscores a shift toward patient-specific strategies to optimize outcomes.

Conclusion: Tailored stabilization techniques are essential for successful PE correction. Although advancements in fixation methods have reduced displacement risks, standardized postoperative protocols and multicenter studies are needed to validate these innovations and improve long-term outcomes (PROSPERO: CRD42024595337).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chest Surgery
Journal of Chest Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信