IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2025-02-28 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-1707
Jean L Reinoso, Haneen Mallah, Selina Sutchu, Michael DiRico, Pankit Patel, Karthik Vijayan, Hiren J Mehta
{"title":"Safety and outcomes of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves under moderate sedation.","authors":"Jean L Reinoso, Haneen Mallah, Selina Sutchu, Michael DiRico, Pankit Patel, Karthik Vijayan, Hiren J Mehta","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using endobronchial valves (EBV) offers a minimally invasive treatment for severe emphysema. Traditionally performed under general anesthesia (GA), this study evaluates whether BLVR performed under moderate sedation (MS) potentially has less adverse events as compared to ones done under GA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 65 patients who underwent BLVR with EBV placement at the University of Florida between January 2020 and June 2022. All procedures were performed under MS. Primary outcomes assessed included the incidence of pneumothorax (PTX), while secondary outcomes comprised valve removal rates, need for revision bronchoscopy, and other procedural complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of PTX was 16.9%, lower than the previously reported rate of 26% in studies combining GA and MS. No major complications or deaths were reported. Procedures were successfully completed in all patients, with valves deployed as planned. Revision bronchoscopy was required in 21.5% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BLVR under MS is demonstrated to be safe and feasible, with a lower rate of complications compared to GA. These findings suggest that MS may be a preferred sedation method for BLVR, though further research is warranted to confirm these results and explore the long-term outcomes and cost implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"17 2","pages":"641-649"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)仍然是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。使用支气管内瓣膜(EBV)的支气管镜肺容积缩小术(BLVR)是治疗严重肺气肿的一种微创疗法。传统的肺容积缩小术是在全身麻醉(GA)下进行的,本研究评估了在中度镇静(MS)下进行肺容积缩小术是否比在全身麻醉下进行肺容积缩小术的不良反应更少:这项回顾性分析包括 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在佛罗里达大学接受 BLVR 并置入 EBV 的 65 名患者。所有手术均在 MS 下进行。评估的主要结果包括气胸(PTX)的发生率,次要结果包括瓣膜切除率、复查支气管镜的需要以及其他手术并发症:结果:PTX发生率为16.9%,低于之前报道的结合GA和MS的研究中26%的发生率。没有重大并发症或死亡报告。所有患者的手术均顺利完成,瓣膜按计划部署。21.5%的病例需要重新进行支气管镜检查:结论:MS 下的 BLVR 安全可行,并发症发生率低于 GA。这些研究结果表明,MS可能是BLVR的首选镇静方法,但仍需进一步研究以证实这些结果,并探讨其长期效果和成本影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and outcomes of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves under moderate sedation.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using endobronchial valves (EBV) offers a minimally invasive treatment for severe emphysema. Traditionally performed under general anesthesia (GA), this study evaluates whether BLVR performed under moderate sedation (MS) potentially has less adverse events as compared to ones done under GA.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 65 patients who underwent BLVR with EBV placement at the University of Florida between January 2020 and June 2022. All procedures were performed under MS. Primary outcomes assessed included the incidence of pneumothorax (PTX), while secondary outcomes comprised valve removal rates, need for revision bronchoscopy, and other procedural complications.

Results: The incidence of PTX was 16.9%, lower than the previously reported rate of 26% in studies combining GA and MS. No major complications or deaths were reported. Procedures were successfully completed in all patients, with valves deployed as planned. Revision bronchoscopy was required in 21.5% of cases.

Conclusions: BLVR under MS is demonstrated to be safe and feasible, with a lower rate of complications compared to GA. These findings suggest that MS may be a preferred sedation method for BLVR, though further research is warranted to confirm these results and explore the long-term outcomes and cost implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信