IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Megumi Kishino, Jonathan Koffman, Jun Hamano, Takahiro Higashibata, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Clare Ellis-Smith
{"title":"Family-Integrated Advance Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study.","authors":"Megumi Kishino, Jonathan Koffman, Jun Hamano, Takahiro Higashibata, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Clare Ellis-Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Advance care planning programs which focus on facilitating conversations among families are scant. We developed a family-integrated Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG-Fam).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to examine the ability and acceptability of the SICG-Fam for advanced cancer patients, family members and physicians in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Trained physicians provided their patients and family members with serious illness conversations using the SICG-Fam. Data regarding ability and acceptability were collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with patients, family members and physicians. Descriptive statistics and thematic analyses were conducted for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February to May 2023, 10 physicians and 22 dyads comprising 22 patients and 24 family members participated. Physicians had a median of 19 years' experience. Each item in the SICG-Fam was delivered by physicians in 18-22 of all the 22 conversations. Patients and family members, except for one family member, judged the conversation as being helpful to discuss their respective views on patients' wishes. Two patients and four family members evaluated the conversation as distressing. Family context, including family relationships, and how physicians engage with them, including supportive attitudes and encouraging patients and family members to express their views, affected the perceived helpfulness of the conversation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SICG-Fam was delivered by physicians and accepted by patients and family members. However, how physicians consider the family perception of the conversation may mitigate potential patient and family member distress. Future studies should focus on further refining the intervention to address the identified challenges and rigorously investigate the effectiveness of this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.03.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以促进家庭间对话为重点的预先护理规划项目很少。我们开发了一个家庭综合重病对话指南(SICG-Fam):本研究旨在考察日本晚期癌症患者、家属和医生对 SICG-Fam 的接受能力:方法:接受过培训的医生使用 SICG-Fam 为患者和家属提供重病对话。通过对患者、家属和医生进行问卷调查和半结构化访谈,收集有关能力和接受度的数据。数据分析采用了描述性统计和主题分析:从 2023 年 2 月到 5 月,共有 10 名医生和 22 个由 22 名患者和 24 名家属组成的二人小组参与了研究。医生的工作经验中位数为 19 年。在所有 22 次对话中,医生在 18-22 次对话中均表达了 SICG-Fam 中的每个项目。除一名家属外,患者和家属都认为谈话有助于讨论各自对患者意愿的看法。两名患者和四名家属认为谈话令人痛苦。家庭背景(包括家庭关系)和医生与他们的接触方式(包括支持态度和鼓励患者及家属表达意见)影响了人们对谈话有用性的看法:SICG-Fam由医生实施,并为患者和家属所接受。然而,医生如何考虑家属对谈话的看法可能会减轻患者和家属潜在的痛苦。未来的研究应侧重于进一步完善干预措施,以应对已发现的挑战,并严格研究这种方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family-Integrated Advance Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study.

Context: Advance care planning programs which focus on facilitating conversations among families are scant. We developed a family-integrated Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG-Fam).

Objectives: This study aims to examine the ability and acceptability of the SICG-Fam for advanced cancer patients, family members and physicians in Japan.

Methods: Trained physicians provided their patients and family members with serious illness conversations using the SICG-Fam. Data regarding ability and acceptability were collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with patients, family members and physicians. Descriptive statistics and thematic analyses were conducted for data analysis.

Results: From February to May 2023, 10 physicians and 22 dyads comprising 22 patients and 24 family members participated. Physicians had a median of 19 years' experience. Each item in the SICG-Fam was delivered by physicians in 18-22 of all the 22 conversations. Patients and family members, except for one family member, judged the conversation as being helpful to discuss their respective views on patients' wishes. Two patients and four family members evaluated the conversation as distressing. Family context, including family relationships, and how physicians engage with them, including supportive attitudes and encouraging patients and family members to express their views, affected the perceived helpfulness of the conversation.

Conclusion: The SICG-Fam was delivered by physicians and accepted by patients and family members. However, how physicians consider the family perception of the conversation may mitigate potential patient and family member distress. Future studies should focus on further refining the intervention to address the identified challenges and rigorously investigate the effectiveness of this approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信