感觉被困和乐观:在机械通气脊髓损伤患者中,当前而非未来的医疗条件主导着自我报告的情绪和评估。

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Christina Weckwerth, Robert Gaschler, Uwe Hamsen, Aileen Spieckermann, Thomas Armin Schildhauer, Oliver Cruciger, Christian Waydhas, Christopher Ull
{"title":"感觉被困和乐观:在机械通气脊髓损伤患者中,当前而非未来的医疗条件主导着自我报告的情绪和评估。","authors":"Christina Weckwerth, Robert Gaschler, Uwe Hamsen, Aileen Spieckermann, Thomas Armin Schildhauer, Oliver Cruciger, Christian Waydhas, Christopher Ull","doi":"10.1007/s10880-025-10065-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adverse medical conditions can involve present and expected future restrictions as a double burden: mechanically ventilated patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), on the one hand, face pain and communication restrictions. On the other hand, they are confronted with significant changes in their future life perspective. While past research on emotion and appraisals has studied SCI patients alone or in comparison with healthy controls, the current work disentangles the potential impact of (a) the adverse current state and (b) expected future restrictions by comparing mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients with vs. without SCI in eye-tracking-based self-reports on emotions and appraisals. Results suggest that patients of either group could provide faceted accounts of their current state, such as feeling trapped and insecure. However, the feedback that SCI and other ICU patients gave was similar, suggesting that current adversities dominate self-reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feeling Trapped and Optimistic: Current Rather than Prospective Medical Conditions Dominate Self-Reported Emotions and Appraisals in Mechanically Ventilated Spinal Cord Injury Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Weckwerth, Robert Gaschler, Uwe Hamsen, Aileen Spieckermann, Thomas Armin Schildhauer, Oliver Cruciger, Christian Waydhas, Christopher Ull\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10880-025-10065-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adverse medical conditions can involve present and expected future restrictions as a double burden: mechanically ventilated patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), on the one hand, face pain and communication restrictions. On the other hand, they are confronted with significant changes in their future life perspective. While past research on emotion and appraisals has studied SCI patients alone or in comparison with healthy controls, the current work disentangles the potential impact of (a) the adverse current state and (b) expected future restrictions by comparing mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients with vs. without SCI in eye-tracking-based self-reports on emotions and appraisals. Results suggest that patients of either group could provide faceted accounts of their current state, such as feeling trapped and insecure. However, the feedback that SCI and other ICU patients gave was similar, suggesting that current adversities dominate self-reports.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10065-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10065-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不利的医疗条件可能涉及当前和预期的未来限制,作为双重负担:一方面,机械通气的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者面临疼痛和交流限制。另一方面,他们面临着未来生活前景的重大变化。虽然过去的情绪和评价研究是单独研究SCI患者或与健康对照进行比较,但目前的工作通过比较机械通气重症监护病房(ICU)患者与非SCI患者在基于眼动追踪的情绪和评价自我报告中,理清了(a)不良当前状态和(b)预期未来限制的潜在影响。结果表明,这两组患者都可以从多方面描述他们的当前状态,比如感觉被困住和不安全。然而,SCI患者和其他ICU患者给出的反馈是相似的,这表明当前的逆境主导了自我报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feeling Trapped and Optimistic: Current Rather than Prospective Medical Conditions Dominate Self-Reported Emotions and Appraisals in Mechanically Ventilated Spinal Cord Injury Patients.

Adverse medical conditions can involve present and expected future restrictions as a double burden: mechanically ventilated patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), on the one hand, face pain and communication restrictions. On the other hand, they are confronted with significant changes in their future life perspective. While past research on emotion and appraisals has studied SCI patients alone or in comparison with healthy controls, the current work disentangles the potential impact of (a) the adverse current state and (b) expected future restrictions by comparing mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients with vs. without SCI in eye-tracking-based self-reports on emotions and appraisals. Results suggest that patients of either group could provide faceted accounts of their current state, such as feeling trapped and insecure. However, the feedback that SCI and other ICU patients gave was similar, suggesting that current adversities dominate self-reports.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信