支气管扩张剂反应性和未来慢性气流阻塞:一项跨国纵向研究。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103123
Ben Knox-Brown, Fahad Algharbi, Octavia Mulhern, James Potts, Imed Harrabi, Christer Janson, Rune Nielsen, Dhiraj Agarwal, Andrei Malinovschi, Sanjay Juvekar, Miriam Denguezli, Thorarinn Gíslason, Rana Ahmed, Asaad Nafees, Parvaiz A Koul, Daniel Obaseki, Mahesh Padukudru Anand, Li Cher Loh, Hermínia Brites Dias, Fátima Rodrigues, David Mannino, Mohammed Elbiaze, Karima El Rhazi, Filip Mejza, Graham Devereux, Frits M E Franssen, Asma El Sony, Emiel Wouters, Mohammed Al Ghobain, Kevin Mortimer, Abdul Rashid, Rashid Osman, Michael Studnicka, Joao Cardoso, Peter Burney, Andre F S Amaral
{"title":"支气管扩张剂反应性和未来慢性气流阻塞:一项跨国纵向研究。","authors":"Ben Knox-Brown, Fahad Algharbi, Octavia Mulhern, James Potts, Imed Harrabi, Christer Janson, Rune Nielsen, Dhiraj Agarwal, Andrei Malinovschi, Sanjay Juvekar, Miriam Denguezli, Thorarinn Gíslason, Rana Ahmed, Asaad Nafees, Parvaiz A Koul, Daniel Obaseki, Mahesh Padukudru Anand, Li Cher Loh, Hermínia Brites Dias, Fátima Rodrigues, David Mannino, Mohammed Elbiaze, Karima El Rhazi, Filip Mejza, Graham Devereux, Frits M E Franssen, Asma El Sony, Emiel Wouters, Mohammed Al Ghobain, Kevin Mortimer, Abdul Rashid, Rashid Osman, Michael Studnicka, Joao Cardoso, Peter Burney, Andre F S Amaral","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bronchodilator responsiveness testing is mainly used for diagnosing asthma. We aimed to investigate whether it is associated with progression to chronic airflow obstruction over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The multinational Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease cohort study surveyed adults, aged 40 years and above, at baseline and followed them up after a mean of 9.1 years. Recruitment took place between January 2, 2003 and December 26, 2016. Follow-up measurements were collected between January 29, 2019 and October 24, 2021. On both occasions, study participants provided information on respiratory symptoms, health status and several environmental and lifestyle exposures. They also underwent pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry. We defined bronchodilator responsiveness at baseline using the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) 2022 definition, and the presence of chronic airflow obstruction at follow-up as a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC) less than the lower limit of normal. We used multi-level regression models to estimate the association between baseline bronchodilator responsiveness and incident chronic airflow obstruction. We stratified analyses by gender and performed a sensitivity analysis in never smokers.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We analysed data from 3701 adults with 56% being women. Compared to those without bronchodilator responsiveness at baseline, those with bronchodilator responsiveness had 36% increased risk of developing chronic airflow obstruction (RR: 1.36, 95%CI 1.04, 1.80). This effect was stronger in women (RR: 1.45, 95%CI 1.09, 1.91) than men (RR: 1.07, 95%CI 0.51, 2.24). Never smokers with bronchodilator responsiveness also were at greater risk of incident chronic airflow obstruction (RR: 1.48, 95%CI 1.01, 2.20).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Bronchodilator responsiveness appears to be a risk factor for incident chronic airflow obstruction. It is important that future studies in other large population-based cohorts replicate these findings.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Heart and Lung Institute, UK Medical Research Council, and Wellcome Trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"103123"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bronchodilator responsiveness and future chronic airflow obstruction: a multinational longitudinal study.\",\"authors\":\"Ben Knox-Brown, Fahad Algharbi, Octavia Mulhern, James Potts, Imed Harrabi, Christer Janson, Rune Nielsen, Dhiraj Agarwal, Andrei Malinovschi, Sanjay Juvekar, Miriam Denguezli, Thorarinn Gíslason, Rana Ahmed, Asaad Nafees, Parvaiz A Koul, Daniel Obaseki, Mahesh Padukudru Anand, Li Cher Loh, Hermínia Brites Dias, Fátima Rodrigues, David Mannino, Mohammed Elbiaze, Karima El Rhazi, Filip Mejza, Graham Devereux, Frits M E Franssen, Asma El Sony, Emiel Wouters, Mohammed Al Ghobain, Kevin Mortimer, Abdul Rashid, Rashid Osman, Michael Studnicka, Joao Cardoso, Peter Burney, Andre F S Amaral\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bronchodilator responsiveness testing is mainly used for diagnosing asthma. We aimed to investigate whether it is associated with progression to chronic airflow obstruction over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The multinational Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease cohort study surveyed adults, aged 40 years and above, at baseline and followed them up after a mean of 9.1 years. Recruitment took place between January 2, 2003 and December 26, 2016. Follow-up measurements were collected between January 29, 2019 and October 24, 2021. On both occasions, study participants provided information on respiratory symptoms, health status and several environmental and lifestyle exposures. They also underwent pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry. We defined bronchodilator responsiveness at baseline using the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) 2022 definition, and the presence of chronic airflow obstruction at follow-up as a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC) less than the lower limit of normal. We used multi-level regression models to estimate the association between baseline bronchodilator responsiveness and incident chronic airflow obstruction. We stratified analyses by gender and performed a sensitivity analysis in never smokers.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We analysed data from 3701 adults with 56% being women. Compared to those without bronchodilator responsiveness at baseline, those with bronchodilator responsiveness had 36% increased risk of developing chronic airflow obstruction (RR: 1.36, 95%CI 1.04, 1.80). This effect was stronger in women (RR: 1.45, 95%CI 1.09, 1.91) than men (RR: 1.07, 95%CI 0.51, 2.24). Never smokers with bronchodilator responsiveness also were at greater risk of incident chronic airflow obstruction (RR: 1.48, 95%CI 1.01, 2.20).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Bronchodilator responsiveness appears to be a risk factor for incident chronic airflow obstruction. It is important that future studies in other large population-based cohorts replicate these findings.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Heart and Lung Institute, UK Medical Research Council, and Wellcome Trust.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"103123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905823/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103123\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:支气管扩张剂反应性试验主要用于哮喘的诊断。我们的目的是研究它是否随时间进展为慢性气流阻塞。方法:多国阻塞性肺疾病负担队列研究调查了40岁及以上的成年人,在基线时进行随访,平均随访9.1年。招聘时间为2003年1月2日至2016年12月26日。在2019年1月29日至2021年10月24日期间收集了后续测量数据。在这两种情况下,研究参与者都提供了有关呼吸道症状、健康状况以及几种环境和生活方式暴露的信息。他们还接受了支气管扩张剂前后的肺活量测定。我们使用美国胸科学会和欧洲呼吸学会(ATS/ERS) 2022定义来定义基线时的支气管扩张剂反应性,随访时存在慢性气流阻塞,即支气管扩张剂后1秒内的用力呼气量与用力肺活量比(FEV1/FVC)低于正常下限。我们使用多层次回归模型来估计基线支气管扩张剂反应性与慢性气流阻塞之间的关系。我们按性别进行了分层分析,并对从不吸烟者进行了敏感性分析。研究结果:我们分析了3701名成年人的数据,其中56%是女性。与基线时无支气管扩张剂反应的患者相比,有支气管扩张剂反应的患者发生慢性气流阻塞的风险增加36% (RR: 1.36, 95%CI 1.04, 1.80)。这种影响在女性(RR: 1.45, 95%CI 1.09, 1.91)中强于男性(RR: 1.07, 95%CI 0.51, 2.24)。从不吸烟且有支气管扩张剂反应的患者发生慢性气流阻塞的风险也更高(RR: 1.48, 95%CI 1.01, 2.20)。解释:支气管扩张剂反应性似乎是偶发慢性气流阻塞的危险因素。重要的是,未来在其他大规模人群队列中进行的研究可以重复这些发现。资助:国家心肺研究所,英国医学研究委员会和威康信托基金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bronchodilator responsiveness and future chronic airflow obstruction: a multinational longitudinal study.

Background: Bronchodilator responsiveness testing is mainly used for diagnosing asthma. We aimed to investigate whether it is associated with progression to chronic airflow obstruction over time.

Methods: The multinational Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease cohort study surveyed adults, aged 40 years and above, at baseline and followed them up after a mean of 9.1 years. Recruitment took place between January 2, 2003 and December 26, 2016. Follow-up measurements were collected between January 29, 2019 and October 24, 2021. On both occasions, study participants provided information on respiratory symptoms, health status and several environmental and lifestyle exposures. They also underwent pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry. We defined bronchodilator responsiveness at baseline using the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) 2022 definition, and the presence of chronic airflow obstruction at follow-up as a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1/FVC) less than the lower limit of normal. We used multi-level regression models to estimate the association between baseline bronchodilator responsiveness and incident chronic airflow obstruction. We stratified analyses by gender and performed a sensitivity analysis in never smokers.

Findings: We analysed data from 3701 adults with 56% being women. Compared to those without bronchodilator responsiveness at baseline, those with bronchodilator responsiveness had 36% increased risk of developing chronic airflow obstruction (RR: 1.36, 95%CI 1.04, 1.80). This effect was stronger in women (RR: 1.45, 95%CI 1.09, 1.91) than men (RR: 1.07, 95%CI 0.51, 2.24). Never smokers with bronchodilator responsiveness also were at greater risk of incident chronic airflow obstruction (RR: 1.48, 95%CI 1.01, 2.20).

Interpretation: Bronchodilator responsiveness appears to be a risk factor for incident chronic airflow obstruction. It is important that future studies in other large population-based cohorts replicate these findings.

Funding: National Heart and Lung Institute, UK Medical Research Council, and Wellcome Trust.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信