{"title":"来自真实世界数据的心脏植入式电子设备电池寿命的进展：电池研究","authors":"Maiko Kuroda MD, Michio Nagashima MD, Masataka Narita MD, Wataru Sasaki MD, Naomichi Tanaka MD, PhD, Kazuhisa Matsumoto MD, PhD, Tsukasa Naganuma MD, Hitoshi Mori MD, PhD, Yoshifumi Ikeda MD, PhD, Kengo Korai MD, Masato Fukunaga MD, Kenichi Hiroshima MD, Kenji Ando MD, Ritsushi Kato MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Technological development has improved the battery longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, there have been no reports on the extent of the improvement in battery longevity in the real world.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent CIED exchanges from February 2006 to June 2023 were included in this study. The actual battery longevity calculated from the implantation date to the battery replacement date and the predicted battery longevity based on manufacturer reports were investigated. All patients were divided into five groups according to their initial implantation dates. After excluding the first and last groups, the data among the middle three groups (P1, P2, P3) were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 3119 patients (pacemakers [PMs], 2138; ICDs, 477; cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers [CRTPs], 121; cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators [CRTDs], 383) were enrolled in this study. The predicted device longevity improved over time for all devices, but in recent analyses, it has been overestimated compared to the actual device longevity for PMs, ICDs, and CRTPs. The actual device longevity of PMs, ICDs, and CRTDs exhibited an extension in the early two periods (P1 vs. P2), but no extension was observed in the most recent two periods (P2 vs. P3). CRTPs showed no improvement in any of the periods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The battery longevity has improved by only about 1 year over the past nearly 15 years. Moreover, the discrepancy between the predicted and actual battery longevity suggests that a reevaluation of the methods for calculating the predicted battery longevity may be necessary.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70041","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancements in BATTERY longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices from real-world data: BATTERY study\",\"authors\":\"Maiko Kuroda MD, Michio Nagashima MD, Masataka Narita MD, Wataru Sasaki MD, Naomichi Tanaka MD, PhD, Kazuhisa Matsumoto MD, PhD, Tsukasa Naganuma MD, Hitoshi Mori MD, PhD, Yoshifumi Ikeda MD, PhD, Kengo Korai MD, Masato Fukunaga MD, Kenichi Hiroshima MD, Kenji Ando MD, Ritsushi Kato MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joa3.70041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Technological development has improved the battery longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, there have been no reports on the extent of the improvement in battery longevity in the real world.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients who underwent CIED exchanges from February 2006 to June 2023 were included in this study. The actual battery longevity calculated from the implantation date to the battery replacement date and the predicted battery longevity based on manufacturer reports were investigated. All patients were divided into five groups according to their initial implantation dates. After excluding the first and last groups, the data among the middle three groups (P1, P2, P3) were compared.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 3119 patients (pacemakers [PMs], 2138; ICDs, 477; cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers [CRTPs], 121; cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators [CRTDs], 383) were enrolled in this study. The predicted device longevity improved over time for all devices, but in recent analyses, it has been overestimated compared to the actual device longevity for PMs, ICDs, and CRTPs. The actual device longevity of PMs, ICDs, and CRTDs exhibited an extension in the early two periods (P1 vs. P2), but no extension was observed in the most recent two periods (P2 vs. P3). CRTPs showed no improvement in any of the periods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The battery longevity has improved by only about 1 year over the past nearly 15 years. Moreover, the discrepancy between the predicted and actual battery longevity suggests that a reevaluation of the methods for calculating the predicted battery longevity may be necessary.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70041\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
技术的发展提高了心脏植入式电子装置（cied）的电池寿命。然而，在现实世界中，还没有关于电池寿命改善程度的报道。方法纳入2006年2月至2023年6月期间接受CIED交换治疗的患者。研究了从电池植入日期到电池更换日期计算的实际电池寿命和基于制造商报告的预测电池寿命。所有患者根据首次植入日期分为五组。排除第一组和最后组后，比较中间三组（P1、P2、P3）的数据。结果共3119例患者(起搏器[pm]， 2138例；接口控制文件,477;心脏再同步化治疗起搏器[CRTPs], 121；心脏再同步化治疗除颤器[crtd]， 383)被纳入本研究。所有设备的预期设备寿命都随着时间的推移而提高，但在最近的分析中，与pm、icd和crtp的实际设备寿命相比，它被高估了。pm、icd和crtd的实际设备寿命在前两个阶段（P1 vs. P2）有所延长，但在最近两个阶段（P2 vs. P3）没有延长。crtp在任何时期都没有改善。结论近15年来，电池寿命仅提高了1年左右。此外，预测和实际电池寿命之间的差异表明，可能有必要重新评估计算预测电池寿命的方法。
Advancements in BATTERY longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices from real-world data: BATTERY study
Background
Technological development has improved the battery longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, there have been no reports on the extent of the improvement in battery longevity in the real world.
Methods
Patients who underwent CIED exchanges from February 2006 to June 2023 were included in this study. The actual battery longevity calculated from the implantation date to the battery replacement date and the predicted battery longevity based on manufacturer reports were investigated. All patients were divided into five groups according to their initial implantation dates. After excluding the first and last groups, the data among the middle three groups (P1, P2, P3) were compared.
Results
A total of 3119 patients (pacemakers [PMs], 2138; ICDs, 477; cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers [CRTPs], 121; cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators [CRTDs], 383) were enrolled in this study. The predicted device longevity improved over time for all devices, but in recent analyses, it has been overestimated compared to the actual device longevity for PMs, ICDs, and CRTPs. The actual device longevity of PMs, ICDs, and CRTDs exhibited an extension in the early two periods (P1 vs. P2), but no extension was observed in the most recent two periods (P2 vs. P3). CRTPs showed no improvement in any of the periods.
Conclusion
The battery longevity has improved by only about 1 year over the past nearly 15 years. Moreover, the discrepancy between the predicted and actual battery longevity suggests that a reevaluation of the methods for calculating the predicted battery longevity may be necessary.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
