认知负荷的综合系统文献综述:方法、技术和案例研究的趋势

IF 2.5 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
A. Lucchese, A. Padovano, F. Facchini
{"title":"认知负荷的综合系统文献综述:方法、技术和案例研究的趋势","authors":"A. Lucchese,&nbsp;A. Padovano,&nbsp;F. Facchini","doi":"10.1049/cim2.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cognitive workload (CWL) assessment has gained traction in Industry 4.0 and 5.0, where human-machine interactions are becoming more intricate. However, there is a lack of comprehensively addressed CWL assessment by considering methodologies, technologies, and case studies. The present work reviews 70 articles related to the CWL assessment. The review identifies five main methodologies for the CWL assessment: physiological measures (e.g. EEG, HRV, and eye-tracking), subjective evaluation (e.g. NASA-TLX), performance evaluation, cognitive load models, and multimodal approaches. The analysis shows an increasing trend towards multimodal approaches that combine subjective assessment methods with physiological measures obtained from electroencephalography, eye-tracking, and heart rate monitoring devices. Additionally, emerging technologies such as augmented reality and collaborative robots are increasingly considered in case studies that address the CWL assessment in current work environments. Results reveal significant advancements in physiological and multimodal assessment methods, particularly emphasising real-time monitoring capabilities and context-specific applications. Case studies underscore the key role of CWL management in assembly, maintenance, and construction tasks, demonstrating its impact on performance, safety, and adaptability in dynamic environments. This review establishes a framework for advancing CWL research by addressing methodological limitations and proposing future research directions, including the development of personalised, adaptive systems for real-time workload management.</p>","PeriodicalId":33286,"journal":{"name":"IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/cim2.70025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review on Cognitive Workload: Trends on Methods, Technologies, and Case Studies\",\"authors\":\"A. Lucchese,&nbsp;A. Padovano,&nbsp;F. Facchini\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/cim2.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cognitive workload (CWL) assessment has gained traction in Industry 4.0 and 5.0, where human-machine interactions are becoming more intricate. However, there is a lack of comprehensively addressed CWL assessment by considering methodologies, technologies, and case studies. The present work reviews 70 articles related to the CWL assessment. The review identifies five main methodologies for the CWL assessment: physiological measures (e.g. EEG, HRV, and eye-tracking), subjective evaluation (e.g. NASA-TLX), performance evaluation, cognitive load models, and multimodal approaches. The analysis shows an increasing trend towards multimodal approaches that combine subjective assessment methods with physiological measures obtained from electroencephalography, eye-tracking, and heart rate monitoring devices. Additionally, emerging technologies such as augmented reality and collaborative robots are increasingly considered in case studies that address the CWL assessment in current work environments. Results reveal significant advancements in physiological and multimodal assessment methods, particularly emphasising real-time monitoring capabilities and context-specific applications. Case studies underscore the key role of CWL management in assembly, maintenance, and construction tasks, demonstrating its impact on performance, safety, and adaptability in dynamic environments. This review establishes a framework for advancing CWL research by addressing methodological limitations and proposing future research directions, including the development of personalised, adaptive systems for real-time workload management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/cim2.70025\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/cim2.70025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/cim2.70025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知工作量(CWL)评估在工业4.0和5.0中获得了牵引力,人机交互变得更加复杂。然而,缺乏综合考虑方法、技术和案例研究的CWL评估。本工作回顾了70篇与CWL评估相关的文章。该综述确定了CWL评估的五种主要方法:生理测量(如EEG、HRV和眼动追踪)、主观评估(如NASA-TLX)、性能评估、认知负荷模型和多模态方法。分析显示多模式方法的发展趋势,将主观评估方法与从脑电图、眼动追踪和心率监测设备获得的生理测量相结合。此外,在解决当前工作环境中CWL评估的案例研究中,越来越多地考虑新兴技术,如增强现实和协作机器人。结果显示,生理和多模态评估方法取得了重大进展,特别是强调实时监测能力和特定环境的应用。案例研究强调了CWL管理在装配、维护和施工任务中的关键作用,展示了它对动态环境中的性能、安全性和适应性的影响。本综述通过解决方法上的局限性和提出未来的研究方向,包括开发个性化的、自适应的实时工作量管理系统,为推进CWL研究建立了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review on Cognitive Workload: Trends on Methods, Technologies, and Case Studies

Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review on Cognitive Workload: Trends on Methods, Technologies, and Case Studies

Cognitive workload (CWL) assessment has gained traction in Industry 4.0 and 5.0, where human-machine interactions are becoming more intricate. However, there is a lack of comprehensively addressed CWL assessment by considering methodologies, technologies, and case studies. The present work reviews 70 articles related to the CWL assessment. The review identifies five main methodologies for the CWL assessment: physiological measures (e.g. EEG, HRV, and eye-tracking), subjective evaluation (e.g. NASA-TLX), performance evaluation, cognitive load models, and multimodal approaches. The analysis shows an increasing trend towards multimodal approaches that combine subjective assessment methods with physiological measures obtained from electroencephalography, eye-tracking, and heart rate monitoring devices. Additionally, emerging technologies such as augmented reality and collaborative robots are increasingly considered in case studies that address the CWL assessment in current work environments. Results reveal significant advancements in physiological and multimodal assessment methods, particularly emphasising real-time monitoring capabilities and context-specific applications. Case studies underscore the key role of CWL management in assembly, maintenance, and construction tasks, demonstrating its impact on performance, safety, and adaptability in dynamic environments. This review establishes a framework for advancing CWL research by addressing methodological limitations and proposing future research directions, including the development of personalised, adaptive systems for real-time workload management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing
IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
25
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing is a Gold Open Access journal that focuses on the development of efficient and adaptive production and distribution systems. It aims to meet the ever-changing market demands by publishing original research on methodologies and techniques for the application of intelligence, data science, and emerging information and communication technologies in various aspects of manufacturing, such as design, modeling, simulation, planning, and optimization of products, processes, production, and assembly. The journal is indexed in COMPENDEX (Elsevier), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Emerging Sources Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics), INSPEC (IET), SCOPUS (Elsevier) and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信