大学生棒球投手尺侧副韧带损伤的反动作跳跃决定因素的推理研究。

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1177/03635465251322913
Mu Qiao, Ryan L Crotin, David J Szymanski
{"title":"大学生棒球投手尺侧副韧带损伤的反动作跳跃决定因素的推理研究。","authors":"Mu Qiao, Ryan L Crotin, David J Szymanski","doi":"10.1177/03635465251322913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Countermovement jump (CMJ) analyses can predict ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in professional baseball pitchers, yet a biomechanical determinant linking CMJ analytics to UCL sprains is unknown.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate CMJ parameters in collegiate pitchers with high and low elbow varus torque (EVT) and investigate multilinear regression relationships between CMJ and EVT kinetics. It was hypothesized that pitchers with greater EVT would have greater CMJ measures, and CMJ kinetics would explain the variance in EVT kinetics.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses of 19 Division I collegiate baseball pitchers (age, 19.9 ± 1.5 years; body height, 1.87 ± 0.08 m; body mass, 90.0 ± 13.4 kg) were performed with integrated ball release speed, 3-dimensional motion capture, and ground reaction force (GRF) technology. A 1-way between-participant analysis of variance was used to compare CMJ and ball velocity metrics, while Pearson correlations (<i>r</i>) were used to evaluate the association between EVT and CMJ kinetic variables. An alpha level of .05 indicated statistical significance for all tests that included effect size calculations (η<sup>2</sup>) for mean differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EVT rate of torque development (EVTRTD) was significantly greater in pitchers with a higher EVT (high EVT: 605 ± 74 vs low EVT: 353 ± 103 N·m·s<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> < .001; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.41). CMJ data were similar between groups, yet correlation models indicated that changes in peak CMJ GRF (<i>r</i> = 0.60, <i>P</i> < .001) and power (<i>r</i> = 0.53, <i>P</i> < .05) can explain variance in EVTRTD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with absolute EVT, CMJ kinetics were more associated with the rate of EVT in collegiate pitchers.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Therefore, as it relates to injury surveillance, identifying pitchers who display increases in peak GRF, concentric impulse, and peak CMJ power may provide early detection in protecting athletes from elbow valgus overload.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1202-1209"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Inferential Investigation Into Countermovement Jump Determinants of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers.\",\"authors\":\"Mu Qiao, Ryan L Crotin, David J Szymanski\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465251322913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Countermovement jump (CMJ) analyses can predict ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in professional baseball pitchers, yet a biomechanical determinant linking CMJ analytics to UCL sprains is unknown.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate CMJ parameters in collegiate pitchers with high and low elbow varus torque (EVT) and investigate multilinear regression relationships between CMJ and EVT kinetics. It was hypothesized that pitchers with greater EVT would have greater CMJ measures, and CMJ kinetics would explain the variance in EVT kinetics.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses of 19 Division I collegiate baseball pitchers (age, 19.9 ± 1.5 years; body height, 1.87 ± 0.08 m; body mass, 90.0 ± 13.4 kg) were performed with integrated ball release speed, 3-dimensional motion capture, and ground reaction force (GRF) technology. A 1-way between-participant analysis of variance was used to compare CMJ and ball velocity metrics, while Pearson correlations (<i>r</i>) were used to evaluate the association between EVT and CMJ kinetic variables. An alpha level of .05 indicated statistical significance for all tests that included effect size calculations (η<sup>2</sup>) for mean differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EVT rate of torque development (EVTRTD) was significantly greater in pitchers with a higher EVT (high EVT: 605 ± 74 vs low EVT: 353 ± 103 N·m·s<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> < .001; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.41). CMJ data were similar between groups, yet correlation models indicated that changes in peak CMJ GRF (<i>r</i> = 0.60, <i>P</i> < .001) and power (<i>r</i> = 0.53, <i>P</i> < .05) can explain variance in EVTRTD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with absolute EVT, CMJ kinetics were more associated with the rate of EVT in collegiate pitchers.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Therefore, as it relates to injury surveillance, identifying pitchers who display increases in peak GRF, concentric impulse, and peak CMJ power may provide early detection in protecting athletes from elbow valgus overload.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1202-1209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251322913\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251322913","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:反向运动跳跃(CMJ)分析可以预测职业棒球投手尺侧副韧带(UCL)损伤,然而,将CMJ分析与UCL扭伤联系起来的生物力学决定因素尚不清楚。目的/假设:本研究的目的是评估高、低肘内翻扭矩(EVT)大学生投手的CMJ参数,并探讨CMJ与EVT动力学之间的多元线性回归关系。假设EVT大的投手有更大的CMJ测量,CMJ动力学可以解释EVT动力学的差异。研究设计:描述性实验室研究。方法:对19名大学生甲级棒球投手(年龄19.9±1.5岁;体高:1.87±0.08 m;体重(90.0±13.4 kg),采用集成球释放速度、三维运动捕捉和地面反作用力(GRF)技术。1-way参与者间方差分析用于比较CMJ和球速度指标,而Pearson相关性(r)用于评估EVT和CMJ动力学变量之间的关联。alpha水平为0.05表示包括平均差异效应大小计算(η2)在内的所有检验具有统计学意义。结果:高EVT的投手EVT扭矩发展率(EVTRTD)显著高于高EVT的投手(高EVT: 605±74 vs低EVT: 353±103 N·m·s-1;P < .001;η2 = 0.41)。两组间CMJ数据相似,但相关模型显示CMJ峰值GRF (r = 0.60, P < 0.001)和功率(r = 0.53, P < 0.05)的变化可以解释EVTRTD的差异。结论:与绝对EVT相比,CMJ动力学与大学生投手EVT率的关系更大。临床相关性:因此,当涉及到损伤监测时,识别那些表现出峰值GRF、同心冲量和峰值CMJ功率增加的投手,可能为保护运动员免受肘关节外翻过载提供早期检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Inferential Investigation Into Countermovement Jump Determinants of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers.

Background: Countermovement jump (CMJ) analyses can predict ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in professional baseball pitchers, yet a biomechanical determinant linking CMJ analytics to UCL sprains is unknown.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate CMJ parameters in collegiate pitchers with high and low elbow varus torque (EVT) and investigate multilinear regression relationships between CMJ and EVT kinetics. It was hypothesized that pitchers with greater EVT would have greater CMJ measures, and CMJ kinetics would explain the variance in EVT kinetics.

Study design: Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods: Analyses of 19 Division I collegiate baseball pitchers (age, 19.9 ± 1.5 years; body height, 1.87 ± 0.08 m; body mass, 90.0 ± 13.4 kg) were performed with integrated ball release speed, 3-dimensional motion capture, and ground reaction force (GRF) technology. A 1-way between-participant analysis of variance was used to compare CMJ and ball velocity metrics, while Pearson correlations (r) were used to evaluate the association between EVT and CMJ kinetic variables. An alpha level of .05 indicated statistical significance for all tests that included effect size calculations (η2) for mean differences.

Results: The EVT rate of torque development (EVTRTD) was significantly greater in pitchers with a higher EVT (high EVT: 605 ± 74 vs low EVT: 353 ± 103 N·m·s-1; P < .001; η2 = 0.41). CMJ data were similar between groups, yet correlation models indicated that changes in peak CMJ GRF (r = 0.60, P < .001) and power (r = 0.53, P < .05) can explain variance in EVTRTD.

Conclusion: Compared with absolute EVT, CMJ kinetics were more associated with the rate of EVT in collegiate pitchers.

Clinical relevance: Therefore, as it relates to injury surveillance, identifying pitchers who display increases in peak GRF, concentric impulse, and peak CMJ power may provide early detection in protecting athletes from elbow valgus overload.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信