以用户为中心的实时设计:利用内部人员的位置来通知设计和采用。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Jessica Kanis, Emily C Webber, Rob Busch, Jason T Schaffer
{"title":"以用户为中心的实时设计:利用内部人员的位置来通知设计和采用。","authors":"Jessica Kanis, Emily C Webber, Rob Busch, Jason T Schaffer","doi":"10.1055/a-2556-4652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have significantly impacted healthcare improving access to patient information and enhancing communication among the health care team. However, lack of usability and increased documentation burden has greatly contributed to clinician burnout. Improvements in EHR design that include physician input is critical to develop specific changes that make EHRs less cumbersome; however, it can be challenging to gather input from physicians with full clinical workloads.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to establish a practical, repeatable framework for soliciting and integrating user-centered design elements into our vendor EHR system utilizing meaningful clinician involvement and feedback.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a one-year period, physician volunteers were given access to a position within the EHR where new features were available for testing before widespread deployment. Real-time feedback was obtained through a shared platform with institutional IS support leaders and vendor executive and used to impact design and broader implementation decisions. Physician feedback regarding the testing process was obtained via survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen physicians and 15 support staff were given access to a separate unique EHR position to test new features during real-world clinical work at their discretion. Feedback was given via a Teams chat function resulting in 1024 messages from 28 users over a one- year period peaking in accordance with new features made available. During two primary phases, 8 new EHR features were tested to elicit feedback prior to adoption. Six of the eight features were adopted after initial testing while 2 required additional changes to improve functionality prior to implementation. The majority found this method intuitive and effective in testing new EHR features.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Healthcare EHR workflows are effective and well adopted when informed and designed by the clinical users. The insider position was shown to be an effective method for testing new features to gain valuable insight without overburdening clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User-centered Design in Real Time: Utilization of an Insider Position to Inform Design and Adoption.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Kanis, Emily C Webber, Rob Busch, Jason T Schaffer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2556-4652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have significantly impacted healthcare improving access to patient information and enhancing communication among the health care team. However, lack of usability and increased documentation burden has greatly contributed to clinician burnout. Improvements in EHR design that include physician input is critical to develop specific changes that make EHRs less cumbersome; however, it can be challenging to gather input from physicians with full clinical workloads.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to establish a practical, repeatable framework for soliciting and integrating user-centered design elements into our vendor EHR system utilizing meaningful clinician involvement and feedback.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a one-year period, physician volunteers were given access to a position within the EHR where new features were available for testing before widespread deployment. Real-time feedback was obtained through a shared platform with institutional IS support leaders and vendor executive and used to impact design and broader implementation decisions. Physician feedback regarding the testing process was obtained via survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen physicians and 15 support staff were given access to a separate unique EHR position to test new features during real-world clinical work at their discretion. Feedback was given via a Teams chat function resulting in 1024 messages from 28 users over a one- year period peaking in accordance with new features made available. During two primary phases, 8 new EHR features were tested to elicit feedback prior to adoption. Six of the eight features were adopted after initial testing while 2 required additional changes to improve functionality prior to implementation. The majority found this method intuitive and effective in testing new EHR features.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Healthcare EHR workflows are effective and well adopted when informed and designed by the clinical users. The insider position was shown to be an effective method for testing new features to gain valuable insight without overburdening clinicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2556-4652\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2556-4652","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:电子健康记录(EHRs)对医疗保健产生了重大影响,改善了对患者信息的访问,增强了医疗保健团队之间的沟通。然而,缺乏可用性和增加的文件负担极大地促成了临床医生的倦怠。电子病历设计的改进,包括医生的输入,对于开发使电子病历不那么麻烦的具体变化至关重要;然而,从具有完整临床工作量的医生那里收集信息可能具有挑战性。目的:我们试图建立一个实用的、可重复的框架,以征求和整合以用户为中心的设计元素到我们的供应商电子病历系统中,利用有意义的临床医生参与和反馈。方法:在一年的时间里,医生志愿者被允许进入EHR的一个位置,在广泛部署之前,新功能可以用于测试。通过与机构的IS支持领导和供应商执行人员共享的平台获得实时反馈,并用于影响设计和更广泛的实施决策。通过调查获得了医生对测试过程的反馈。结果:13名医生和15名支持人员被允许进入一个单独的独特的电子病历位置,在他们的自由裁量权下测试现实世界临床工作中的新功能。反馈是通过团队聊天功能提供的,结果是28个用户在一年的时间里发出了1024条消息,与可用的新功能一致。在两个主要阶段,测试了8个新的电子病历功能,以便在采用之前获得反馈。八个特性中的六个在初始测试后被采用,而两个需要在实现之前进行额外的更改以改进功能。大多数人认为这种方法在测试新的电子病历功能时直观有效。讨论:医疗保健电子病历工作流程是有效的,并且在临床用户知情和设计时被很好地采用。内部位置被证明是测试新特征的有效方法,可以在不增加临床医生负担的情况下获得有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
User-centered Design in Real Time: Utilization of an Insider Position to Inform Design and Adoption.

Background: Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have significantly impacted healthcare improving access to patient information and enhancing communication among the health care team. However, lack of usability and increased documentation burden has greatly contributed to clinician burnout. Improvements in EHR design that include physician input is critical to develop specific changes that make EHRs less cumbersome; however, it can be challenging to gather input from physicians with full clinical workloads.

Objective: We sought to establish a practical, repeatable framework for soliciting and integrating user-centered design elements into our vendor EHR system utilizing meaningful clinician involvement and feedback.

Methods: Over a one-year period, physician volunteers were given access to a position within the EHR where new features were available for testing before widespread deployment. Real-time feedback was obtained through a shared platform with institutional IS support leaders and vendor executive and used to impact design and broader implementation decisions. Physician feedback regarding the testing process was obtained via survey.

Results: Thirteen physicians and 15 support staff were given access to a separate unique EHR position to test new features during real-world clinical work at their discretion. Feedback was given via a Teams chat function resulting in 1024 messages from 28 users over a one- year period peaking in accordance with new features made available. During two primary phases, 8 new EHR features were tested to elicit feedback prior to adoption. Six of the eight features were adopted after initial testing while 2 required additional changes to improve functionality prior to implementation. The majority found this method intuitive and effective in testing new EHR features.

Discussion: Healthcare EHR workflows are effective and well adopted when informed and designed by the clinical users. The insider position was shown to be an effective method for testing new features to gain valuable insight without overburdening clinicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信