镁基生物可吸收支架植入前最佳病变准备的效果:OPTIMIS研究的12个月结果

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kirstine Nørregaard Hansen, Akiko Maehara, Jens Trøan, Manijeh Noori, Mikkel Hougaard, Julia Ellert, Karsten Tange Veien, Anders Junker, Henrik Steen Hansen, Jens Flensted Lassen, Lisette Okkels Jensen
{"title":"镁基生物可吸收支架植入前最佳病变准备的效果:OPTIMIS研究的12个月结果","authors":"Kirstine Nørregaard Hansen, Akiko Maehara, Jens Trøan, Manijeh Noori, Mikkel Hougaard, Julia Ellert, Karsten Tange Veien, Anders Junker, Henrik Steen Hansen, Jens Flensted Lassen, Lisette Okkels Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumen reduction after bioresorbable scaffold implantation has been reported. This study aimed to assess the influence of pre-dilatation with a scoring balloon versus a standard non-compliant balloon prior to implanting a magnesium-based Magmaris bioresorbable scaffold (MgBRS) on lumen measurements using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and on clinical outcomes after 12 months.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In the OPTIMIS-study (Optimal lesion preparation before implantation of a MgBRS in patients with coronary artery stenosis), patients were randomly assigned to pre-dilatation with a scoring balloon or a standard non-compliant balloon before MgBRS implantation. OCT was performed before and after scaffold implantation, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Clinical 12-month follow-up was performed for all 82 enrolled patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serial pre- and post-procedural, 6- and 12-month OCT were available in 33 lesions (scoring: n = 16 vs. standard: n = 17). Minimal lumen area (MLA) (scoring 4.6 ± 0.5 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. standard 3.6 ± 0.5 mm<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.16) did not differ significantly at 12 months. In both the scoring and standard non-compliant balloon group, MLA changed significantly over time (post-procedure - 6-month - 12-month) (scoring balloon: 7.2 ± 1.8 mm<sup>2</sup>-5.1 ± 1.7 mm<sup>2</sup>-5.0 ± 1.9 mm<sup>2</sup>, p < 0.01, and standard non-compliant balloon: 6.2 ± 1.1 mm<sup>2</sup>-5.2 ± 1.5 mm<sup>2</sup>-5.3 ± 2.0 mm<sup>2</sup>, p < 0.01). No target lesion revascularizations (TLR) occurred in the scoring balloon group, compared to 7 TLR in the standard non-compliant balloon group within 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In lesions treated with MgBRS, MLA did not differ significantly after 12 months among lesions pre-dilated with a scoring balloon compared to a standard non-compliant balloon. However, only lesions pre-dilated with a scoring balloon were free from TLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of optimal lesion preparation prior to implantation of a magnesium-based bioresorbable scaffold: 12-month results of the OPTIMIS study.\",\"authors\":\"Kirstine Nørregaard Hansen, Akiko Maehara, Jens Trøan, Manijeh Noori, Mikkel Hougaard, Julia Ellert, Karsten Tange Veien, Anders Junker, Henrik Steen Hansen, Jens Flensted Lassen, Lisette Okkels Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumen reduction after bioresorbable scaffold implantation has been reported. This study aimed to assess the influence of pre-dilatation with a scoring balloon versus a standard non-compliant balloon prior to implanting a magnesium-based Magmaris bioresorbable scaffold (MgBRS) on lumen measurements using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and on clinical outcomes after 12 months.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In the OPTIMIS-study (Optimal lesion preparation before implantation of a MgBRS in patients with coronary artery stenosis), patients were randomly assigned to pre-dilatation with a scoring balloon or a standard non-compliant balloon before MgBRS implantation. OCT was performed before and after scaffold implantation, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Clinical 12-month follow-up was performed for all 82 enrolled patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serial pre- and post-procedural, 6- and 12-month OCT were available in 33 lesions (scoring: n = 16 vs. standard: n = 17). Minimal lumen area (MLA) (scoring 4.6 ± 0.5 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. standard 3.6 ± 0.5 mm<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.16) did not differ significantly at 12 months. In both the scoring and standard non-compliant balloon group, MLA changed significantly over time (post-procedure - 6-month - 12-month) (scoring balloon: 7.2 ± 1.8 mm<sup>2</sup>-5.1 ± 1.7 mm<sup>2</sup>-5.0 ± 1.9 mm<sup>2</sup>, p < 0.01, and standard non-compliant balloon: 6.2 ± 1.1 mm<sup>2</sup>-5.2 ± 1.5 mm<sup>2</sup>-5.3 ± 2.0 mm<sup>2</sup>, p < 0.01). No target lesion revascularizations (TLR) occurred in the scoring balloon group, compared to 7 TLR in the standard non-compliant balloon group within 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In lesions treated with MgBRS, MLA did not differ significantly after 12 months among lesions pre-dilated with a scoring balloon compared to a standard non-compliant balloon. However, only lesions pre-dilated with a scoring balloon were free from TLR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.03.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.03.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物可吸收支架植入后管腔减少已有报道。本研究旨在评估在植入镁基Magmaris生物可吸收支架(MgBRS)之前,使用评分球囊进行预扩张与使用标准非依从球囊进行预扩张对光学相干断层扫描(OCT)进行管腔测量以及12个月后临床结果的影响。方法:在optimis研究(冠状动脉狭窄患者MgBRS植入前的最佳病变准备)中,患者被随机分配到MgBRS植入前使用评分球囊预扩张或标准不合规球囊预扩张。在支架植入前后及随访6个月和12个月时行OCT检查。对所有82例入组患者进行了12个月的临床随访。结果:对33个病变进行了术前、术后、6个月和12个月的连续OCT检查(评分:n = 16,标准:n = 17)。最小管腔面积(MLA)(评分4.6±0.5 mm2 vs标准3.6±0.5 mm2, p = 0.16)在12个月时无显著差异。在评分和标准非依从性球囊组中,MLA随时间(术后- 6个月- 12个月)发生显著变化(评分球囊:7.2±1.8 mm2-5.1±1.7 mm2-5.0±1.9 mm2, p -5.2±1.5 mm2-5.3±2.0 mm2, p)结论:在MgBRS治疗的病变中,与标准非依从性球囊相比,使用评分球囊预先扩张的病变在12个月后MLA没有显著差异。然而,只有经评分球囊预扩张的病变才没有TLR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of optimal lesion preparation prior to implantation of a magnesium-based bioresorbable scaffold: 12-month results of the OPTIMIS study.

Background: Lumen reduction after bioresorbable scaffold implantation has been reported. This study aimed to assess the influence of pre-dilatation with a scoring balloon versus a standard non-compliant balloon prior to implanting a magnesium-based Magmaris bioresorbable scaffold (MgBRS) on lumen measurements using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and on clinical outcomes after 12 months.

Method: In the OPTIMIS-study (Optimal lesion preparation before implantation of a MgBRS in patients with coronary artery stenosis), patients were randomly assigned to pre-dilatation with a scoring balloon or a standard non-compliant balloon before MgBRS implantation. OCT was performed before and after scaffold implantation, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Clinical 12-month follow-up was performed for all 82 enrolled patients.

Results: Serial pre- and post-procedural, 6- and 12-month OCT were available in 33 lesions (scoring: n = 16 vs. standard: n = 17). Minimal lumen area (MLA) (scoring 4.6 ± 0.5 mm2 vs. standard 3.6 ± 0.5 mm2, p = 0.16) did not differ significantly at 12 months. In both the scoring and standard non-compliant balloon group, MLA changed significantly over time (post-procedure - 6-month - 12-month) (scoring balloon: 7.2 ± 1.8 mm2-5.1 ± 1.7 mm2-5.0 ± 1.9 mm2, p < 0.01, and standard non-compliant balloon: 6.2 ± 1.1 mm2-5.2 ± 1.5 mm2-5.3 ± 2.0 mm2, p < 0.01). No target lesion revascularizations (TLR) occurred in the scoring balloon group, compared to 7 TLR in the standard non-compliant balloon group within 12 months.

Conclusion: In lesions treated with MgBRS, MLA did not differ significantly after 12 months among lesions pre-dilated with a scoring balloon compared to a standard non-compliant balloon. However, only lesions pre-dilated with a scoring balloon were free from TLR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信