改善创伤同意:回忆(回顾):髋部骨折同意的多中心研究方案。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Tony Feng, Andrew Ablett, Chloe E H Scott, Nick D Clement
{"title":"改善创伤同意:回忆(回顾):髋部骨折同意的多中心研究方案。","authors":"Tony Feng, Andrew Ablett, Chloe E H Scott, Nick D Clement","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study investigates the effectiveness and adequacy of the informed consent process for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. While informed consent is a legal and ethical responsibility, factors in the trauma setting can impair patients' understanding and retention of information. This study seeks to evaluate patients' recall of perioperative complications and explore their perceptions of the consent process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods, multicentre cohort study will be conducted in the Southeast of Scotland. Adult patients with hip fractures will be recruited via purposive sampling. An information recall questionnaire will be administered within 36 hours of admission to assess unprompted and prompted recall of complications. A subset of participants will then undergo a semi-structured qualitative interview postoperatively to explore their experiences and perceptions of the consent process. Data will be analyzed using a social constructivist grounded theory to assess their perceptions of consent. Ethical approval has been granted by the East of England Research Ethics Committee (reference 23/EE/0233).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. The study results will identify challenges in the consent process, particularly in how risks are communicated and understood. The data are expected to inform the development of information aids and enhance the ability of orthopaedic surgeons to provide comprehensive, patient-centred consent.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 3","pages":"336-341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Consent in Trauma: Recall (ICIT: Recall) : a multicentre study protocol of consent for hip fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Tony Feng, Andrew Ablett, Chloe E H Scott, Nick D Clement\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study investigates the effectiveness and adequacy of the informed consent process for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. While informed consent is a legal and ethical responsibility, factors in the trauma setting can impair patients' understanding and retention of information. This study seeks to evaluate patients' recall of perioperative complications and explore their perceptions of the consent process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods, multicentre cohort study will be conducted in the Southeast of Scotland. Adult patients with hip fractures will be recruited via purposive sampling. An information recall questionnaire will be administered within 36 hours of admission to assess unprompted and prompted recall of complications. A subset of participants will then undergo a semi-structured qualitative interview postoperatively to explore their experiences and perceptions of the consent process. Data will be analyzed using a social constructivist grounded theory to assess their perceptions of consent. Ethical approval has been granted by the East of England Research Ethics Committee (reference 23/EE/0233).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. The study results will identify challenges in the consent process, particularly in how risks are communicated and understood. The data are expected to inform the development of information aids and enhance the ability of orthopaedic surgeons to provide comprehensive, patient-centred consent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"336-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956774/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨髋部骨折手术患者知情同意程序的有效性和充分性。虽然知情同意是一项法律和道德责任,但创伤环境中的因素可能会损害患者对信息的理解和保留。本研究旨在评估患者对围手术期并发症的回忆,并探讨他们对同意过程的看法。方法:在苏格兰东南部进行一项混合方法、多中心队列研究。成年髋部骨折患者将通过连续抽样的方式进行招募。入院后36小时内进行信息回忆问卷调查,评估非提示性和提示性并发症的回忆。一部分参与者将在术后接受半结构化的定性访谈,以探讨他们对同意过程的经历和看法。数据将使用社会建构主义理论来分析,以评估他们对同意的看法。伦理批准已由英格兰东部研究伦理委员会授予(参考23/EE/0233)。结论:研究结果将通过同行评议的出版物和在国家和国际会议上的演讲来传播。研究结果将确定同意过程中的挑战,特别是在如何沟通和理解风险方面。这些数据有望为信息辅助工具的开发提供信息,并提高骨科医生提供全面的、以患者为中心的同意的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Consent in Trauma: Recall (ICIT: Recall) : a multicentre study protocol of consent for hip fractures.

Aims: This study investigates the effectiveness and adequacy of the informed consent process for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. While informed consent is a legal and ethical responsibility, factors in the trauma setting can impair patients' understanding and retention of information. This study seeks to evaluate patients' recall of perioperative complications and explore their perceptions of the consent process.

Methods: A mixed-methods, multicentre cohort study will be conducted in the Southeast of Scotland. Adult patients with hip fractures will be recruited via purposive sampling. An information recall questionnaire will be administered within 36 hours of admission to assess unprompted and prompted recall of complications. A subset of participants will then undergo a semi-structured qualitative interview postoperatively to explore their experiences and perceptions of the consent process. Data will be analyzed using a social constructivist grounded theory to assess their perceptions of consent. Ethical approval has been granted by the East of England Research Ethics Committee (reference 23/EE/0233).

Conclusion: Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. The study results will identify challenges in the consent process, particularly in how risks are communicated and understood. The data are expected to inform the development of information aids and enhance the ability of orthopaedic surgeons to provide comprehensive, patient-centred consent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信