{"title":"Magnetic resonance cisternography for trigeminal neuralgia: comparison between gradient-echo and spin-echo 3D sequences.","authors":"Natnicha Wamasing, Hiroshi Watanabe, Ami Kuribayashi, Akiko Imaizumi, Junichiro Sakamoto, Hiroshi Tomisato","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantitatively and qualitatively compare directly two types of cisternography images for diagnosing trigeminal neuralgia (TN) using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study recruited 64 patients with a clinical diagnosis or suspicion of TN. Patients were examined through the three-dimensional (3D) Constructive Interference in Steady State (CISS) and Sampling Perfection with Application-optimized Contrasts using different flip angle Evolutions (SPACE) sequences. Three radiologists quantitatively measured the signal intensity of the trigeminal nerve (cranial nerve V, CN5) (SICN5), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (SICSF), and contrast between CN5 and CSF (Cont.). Additionally, two radiologists qualitatively evaluated the basilar artery (BA), CN5, CSF, image artefacts, and overall image quality. Statistical analyses included paired-sample t-tests, non-parametric McNemar tests, and the Friedman test (significance set at p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean SICN5 (p < 0.001), SICSF (p = 0.679), and Cont. (p < 0.001) were as follows: 203.08 ± 26.68, 936.03 ± 91, and 3.68 ± 0.74 in CISS; 46.80 ± 16.88, 940.61 ± 71.39, and 23.19 ± 14.52 in SPACE. Low-to-moderate CN5 and BA visibility was observed in all cases in CISS, while it was noted in one case for CN5 and in none for BA in SPACE (p < 0.001). Homogenous CSF and minor artefacts were observed in 14 cases in CISS, while it was seen in 52 cases for CN5 and 59 for BA in SPACE (p < 0.001). The overall image quality was scored as four in 57 cases in SPACE, while no cases received this score in CISS (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SPACE provided better images than CISS for evaluating CN5 and prepontine cistern vascularity, indicating a valuable sequence for TN diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study indicates that SPACE should be selected for TN diagnosis instead of CISS sequence.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的直接定量和定性比较使用 3 T 磁共振成像诊断三叉神经痛(TN)的两种蝶形图像:这项前瞻性研究招募了 64 名临床诊断或怀疑患有 TN 的患者。患者通过三维(3D)稳态建设性干扰(CISS)和使用不同翻转角演进(SPACE)序列的应用优化对比度采样完美性进行检查。三位放射科医生定量测量了三叉神经(颅神经 V,CN5)(SICN5)、脑脊液(CSF)(SICSF)的信号强度,以及 CN5 和 CSF 之间的对比度(Cont.)此外,两名放射科医生还对基底动脉 (BA)、CN5、CSF、图像伪影和整体图像质量进行了定性评估。统计分析包括配对样本 t 检验、非参数 McNemar 检验和 Friedman 检验(显著性设定为 p 结果:平均 SICN5(p 结论:SPACE 的图像质量优于 CISS:SPACE 在评估 CN5 和椎前蝶窦血管方面比 CISS 提供了更好的图像,这表明 SPACE 是 TN 诊断的一种有价值的序列:本研究表明,在 TN 诊断中应选择 SPACE 而不是 CISS 序列。
Magnetic resonance cisternography for trigeminal neuralgia: comparison between gradient-echo and spin-echo 3D sequences.
Objective: To quantitatively and qualitatively compare directly two types of cisternography images for diagnosing trigeminal neuralgia (TN) using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging.
Methods: This prospective study recruited 64 patients with a clinical diagnosis or suspicion of TN. Patients were examined through the three-dimensional (3D) Constructive Interference in Steady State (CISS) and Sampling Perfection with Application-optimized Contrasts using different flip angle Evolutions (SPACE) sequences. Three radiologists quantitatively measured the signal intensity of the trigeminal nerve (cranial nerve V, CN5) (SICN5), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (SICSF), and contrast between CN5 and CSF (Cont.). Additionally, two radiologists qualitatively evaluated the basilar artery (BA), CN5, CSF, image artefacts, and overall image quality. Statistical analyses included paired-sample t-tests, non-parametric McNemar tests, and the Friedman test (significance set at p < 0.05).
Results: Mean SICN5 (p < 0.001), SICSF (p = 0.679), and Cont. (p < 0.001) were as follows: 203.08 ± 26.68, 936.03 ± 91, and 3.68 ± 0.74 in CISS; 46.80 ± 16.88, 940.61 ± 71.39, and 23.19 ± 14.52 in SPACE. Low-to-moderate CN5 and BA visibility was observed in all cases in CISS, while it was noted in one case for CN5 and in none for BA in SPACE (p < 0.001). Homogenous CSF and minor artefacts were observed in 14 cases in CISS, while it was seen in 52 cases for CN5 and 59 for BA in SPACE (p < 0.001). The overall image quality was scored as four in 57 cases in SPACE, while no cases received this score in CISS (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: SPACE provided better images than CISS for evaluating CN5 and prepontine cistern vascularity, indicating a valuable sequence for TN diagnosis.
Advances in knowledge: This study indicates that SPACE should be selected for TN diagnosis instead of CISS sequence.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X