在线教育环境中语言同步计算度量的系统比较

Jinnie Shin, A. Pauline Aguinalde
{"title":"在线教育环境中语言同步计算度量的系统比较","authors":"Jinnie Shin,&nbsp;A. Pauline Aguinalde","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Linguistic synchrony, the alignment of linguistic features between conversational partners, is a key indicator for understanding students’ learning outcomes in computer-mediated learning environments, where communication quality directly influences success. In online tutoring, synchrony fosters better comprehension and engagement. Despite numerous methods to measure synchrony—such as lexical, syntactic, and semantic alignment—systematic comparisons across these approaches remain limited, impeding a full understanding of how synchrony operates across different educational contexts. This study addresses this gap by analyzing tutoring conversations from diverse contexts, particularly English as a Second Language (ESL) tutoring and algebra instruction, using seven computational models. These models yielded 29 synchrony indices, ranging from traditional lexical overlap to advanced natural language processing-based embedding models, capturing synchrony across multiple dimensions. Our results show that while these methods generally align with theoretical dimensions of synchrony, variations in embedding methods and distance measures can significantly impact their ability to capture meaningful interactions. Additionally, different subject domains influenced the finer-grained dimensions of synchrony observed, particularly in temporal aspects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic comparison of computational measures of linguistic synchrony in online educational environments\",\"authors\":\"Jinnie Shin,&nbsp;A. Pauline Aguinalde\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Linguistic synchrony, the alignment of linguistic features between conversational partners, is a key indicator for understanding students’ learning outcomes in computer-mediated learning environments, where communication quality directly influences success. In online tutoring, synchrony fosters better comprehension and engagement. Despite numerous methods to measure synchrony—such as lexical, syntactic, and semantic alignment—systematic comparisons across these approaches remain limited, impeding a full understanding of how synchrony operates across different educational contexts. This study addresses this gap by analyzing tutoring conversations from diverse contexts, particularly English as a Second Language (ESL) tutoring and algebra instruction, using seven computational models. These models yielded 29 synchrony indices, ranging from traditional lexical overlap to advanced natural language processing-based embedding models, capturing synchrony across multiple dimensions. Our results show that while these methods generally align with theoretical dimensions of synchrony, variations in embedding methods and distance measures can significantly impact their ability to capture meaningful interactions. Additionally, different subject domains influenced the finer-grained dimensions of synchrony observed, particularly in temporal aspects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766125000163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766125000163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言同步性,即对话伙伴之间语言特征的一致性,是理解学生在计算机中介学习环境中学习成果的关键指标,在计算机中介学习环境中,沟通质量直接影响成功。在在线辅导中,同步可以促进更好的理解和参与。尽管有许多测量同步性的方法(如词汇、句法和语义对齐),但这些方法之间的系统比较仍然有限,阻碍了对不同教育背景下同步性如何运作的充分理解。本研究使用七个计算模型,通过分析不同背景下的辅导对话,特别是英语作为第二语言(ESL)辅导和代数教学,解决了这一差距。这些模型产生了29个同步索引,从传统的词法重叠到基于自然语言处理的高级嵌入模型,捕获了跨多个维度的同步。我们的研究结果表明,虽然这些方法通常与同步的理论维度一致,但嵌入方法和距离度量的变化会显著影响它们捕获有意义交互的能力。此外,不同的学科领域影响观察到的同步的细粒度维度,特别是在时间方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic comparison of computational measures of linguistic synchrony in online educational environments
Linguistic synchrony, the alignment of linguistic features between conversational partners, is a key indicator for understanding students’ learning outcomes in computer-mediated learning environments, where communication quality directly influences success. In online tutoring, synchrony fosters better comprehension and engagement. Despite numerous methods to measure synchrony—such as lexical, syntactic, and semantic alignment—systematic comparisons across these approaches remain limited, impeding a full understanding of how synchrony operates across different educational contexts. This study addresses this gap by analyzing tutoring conversations from diverse contexts, particularly English as a Second Language (ESL) tutoring and algebra instruction, using seven computational models. These models yielded 29 synchrony indices, ranging from traditional lexical overlap to advanced natural language processing-based embedding models, capturing synchrony across multiple dimensions. Our results show that while these methods generally align with theoretical dimensions of synchrony, variations in embedding methods and distance measures can significantly impact their ability to capture meaningful interactions. Additionally, different subject domains influenced the finer-grained dimensions of synchrony observed, particularly in temporal aspects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信