前向和后向贝叶斯滤波器的评估

IF 3 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Daniel Martins Silva, Argimiro Resende Secchi
{"title":"前向和后向贝叶斯滤波器的评估","authors":"Daniel Martins Silva,&nbsp;Argimiro Resende Secchi","doi":"10.1016/j.dche.2025.100224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates a forward–backward filtering approach comprised of forward filters and backward smoothers assimilating estimations of a moving horizon estimation. Those evaluations were carried out for extended, unscented, and cubature combinations of the Kalman filters, besides a particle filter, an ensemble Kalman filter, and a moving horizon estimation. Three simulation scenarios were defined for two nonlinear case studies with different complexity to evaluate the estimation accuracy and computational time under different uncertainty conditions. The backward smoothing was found to degenerate for longer horizons; however, it improved the estimation accuracy with smaller horizons in most simulation scenarios in comparison to the respective filters alone. In addition, the method successfully reduced steady-state estimation bias under model mismatch with a small increase in computational time. The performance of the forward–backward filtering was found to be sensitive to active constraint; however, this drawback does not outweigh the meaningful performance improvements found in this study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72815,"journal":{"name":"Digital Chemical Engineering","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of forward and forward–backward Bayesian filters\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Martins Silva,&nbsp;Argimiro Resende Secchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dche.2025.100224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper investigates a forward–backward filtering approach comprised of forward filters and backward smoothers assimilating estimations of a moving horizon estimation. Those evaluations were carried out for extended, unscented, and cubature combinations of the Kalman filters, besides a particle filter, an ensemble Kalman filter, and a moving horizon estimation. Three simulation scenarios were defined for two nonlinear case studies with different complexity to evaluate the estimation accuracy and computational time under different uncertainty conditions. The backward smoothing was found to degenerate for longer horizons; however, it improved the estimation accuracy with smaller horizons in most simulation scenarios in comparison to the respective filters alone. In addition, the method successfully reduced steady-state estimation bias under model mismatch with a small increase in computational time. The performance of the forward–backward filtering was found to be sensitive to active constraint; however, this drawback does not outweigh the meaningful performance improvements found in this study.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508125000080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508125000080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了一种由前向滤波和后向平滑同化估计组成的前向后向滤波方法。除了粒子滤波器、集合卡尔曼滤波器和移动视界估计之外,还对卡尔曼滤波器的扩展、无气味和培养组合进行了评估。针对两种不同复杂程度的非线性案例,定义了三种模拟情景,以评估不同不确定性条件下的估计精度和计算时间。当视界较长时,后向平滑会退化;然而,在大多数模拟场景中,与单独使用各自的滤波器相比,它提高了较小视界的估计精度。此外,该方法成功地减少了模型失配下的稳态估计偏差,且计算时间增加较少。发现前向后向滤波的性能对主动约束很敏感;然而,这个缺点并没有超过本研究中发现的有意义的性能改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of forward and forward–backward Bayesian filters
This paper investigates a forward–backward filtering approach comprised of forward filters and backward smoothers assimilating estimations of a moving horizon estimation. Those evaluations were carried out for extended, unscented, and cubature combinations of the Kalman filters, besides a particle filter, an ensemble Kalman filter, and a moving horizon estimation. Three simulation scenarios were defined for two nonlinear case studies with different complexity to evaluate the estimation accuracy and computational time under different uncertainty conditions. The backward smoothing was found to degenerate for longer horizons; however, it improved the estimation accuracy with smaller horizons in most simulation scenarios in comparison to the respective filters alone. In addition, the method successfully reduced steady-state estimation bias under model mismatch with a small increase in computational time. The performance of the forward–backward filtering was found to be sensitive to active constraint; however, this drawback does not outweigh the meaningful performance improvements found in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信