远紫外线和便携式HEPA空气净化器减少传染性气溶胶的影响因素

Katherine M. Ratliff*, Lukas Oudejans, M. Worth Calfee, John Archer, Jerome U. Gilberry, David Adam Hook, William E. Schoppman and Robert W. Yaga, 
{"title":"远紫外线和便携式HEPA空气净化器减少传染性气溶胶的影响因素","authors":"Katherine M. Ratliff*,&nbsp;Lukas Oudejans,&nbsp;M. Worth Calfee,&nbsp;John Archer,&nbsp;Jerome U. Gilberry,&nbsp;David Adam Hook,&nbsp;William E. Schoppman and Robert W. Yaga,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.4c0024710.1021/acsestair.4c00247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Technologies that can reduce concentrations of airborne microorganisms through either particle capture or inactivation are important tools for reducing the risk of disease transmission and improving overall indoor air quality. The effectiveness of these technologies is tested in different ways, and as a result, it is challenging to compare results and optimize their use in applied settings. In this study, experiments were conducted in a large bioaerosol chamber to evaluate the efficacy of far-UVC and portable HEPA air cleaners against the bacteriophage MS2 as a surrogate for human viral pathogens. For both technologies, changing the media used to aerosolize the microorganism from deionized water to a simulated saliva doubled effectiveness metrics (both log<sub>10</sub> reductions and clean air delivery rates). Because reductions did not follow first order, log–linear dynamics, using different segments of the test period to calculate efficacy also significantly impacted reported performance. Evidence shown here indicates that both microbiological and particle dynamics likely play a role in impacting test outcomes under current methods, and more research is needed to improve repeatable and reliable standardized approaches for determining technology performance against infectious aerosols.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"2 3","pages":"368–377 368–377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Affecting Reduction of Infectious Aerosols by Far-UVC and Portable HEPA Air Cleaners\",\"authors\":\"Katherine M. Ratliff*,&nbsp;Lukas Oudejans,&nbsp;M. Worth Calfee,&nbsp;John Archer,&nbsp;Jerome U. Gilberry,&nbsp;David Adam Hook,&nbsp;William E. Schoppman and Robert W. Yaga,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestair.4c0024710.1021/acsestair.4c00247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Technologies that can reduce concentrations of airborne microorganisms through either particle capture or inactivation are important tools for reducing the risk of disease transmission and improving overall indoor air quality. The effectiveness of these technologies is tested in different ways, and as a result, it is challenging to compare results and optimize their use in applied settings. In this study, experiments were conducted in a large bioaerosol chamber to evaluate the efficacy of far-UVC and portable HEPA air cleaners against the bacteriophage MS2 as a surrogate for human viral pathogens. For both technologies, changing the media used to aerosolize the microorganism from deionized water to a simulated saliva doubled effectiveness metrics (both log<sub>10</sub> reductions and clean air delivery rates). Because reductions did not follow first order, log–linear dynamics, using different segments of the test period to calculate efficacy also significantly impacted reported performance. Evidence shown here indicates that both microbiological and particle dynamics likely play a role in impacting test outcomes under current methods, and more research is needed to improve repeatable and reliable standardized approaches for determining technology performance against infectious aerosols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"368–377 368–377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能够通过颗粒捕获或灭活来降低空气中微生物浓度的技术是减少疾病传播风险和改善整体室内空气质量的重要工具。这些技术的有效性通过不同的方式进行了测试,因此,比较结果并优化其在实际环境中的使用具有挑战性。本研究在大型生物气溶胶室中进行了实验,以评估远紫外线和便携式HEPA空气净化器对噬菌体MS2(人类病毒病原体的替代品)的功效。对于这两种技术,将用于雾化微生物的介质从去离子水改为模拟唾液,使效率指标翻了一番(减少了log10和清洁空气输送率)。因为减少不遵循一阶,对数线性动态,使用测试期间的不同部分来计算效率也显著影响报告的性能。这里显示的证据表明,微生物和颗粒动力学可能在影响当前方法下的测试结果中发挥作用,需要更多的研究来改进可重复和可靠的标准化方法,以确定技术对传染性气溶胶的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Factors Affecting Reduction of Infectious Aerosols by Far-UVC and Portable HEPA Air Cleaners

Factors Affecting Reduction of Infectious Aerosols by Far-UVC and Portable HEPA Air Cleaners

Technologies that can reduce concentrations of airborne microorganisms through either particle capture or inactivation are important tools for reducing the risk of disease transmission and improving overall indoor air quality. The effectiveness of these technologies is tested in different ways, and as a result, it is challenging to compare results and optimize their use in applied settings. In this study, experiments were conducted in a large bioaerosol chamber to evaluate the efficacy of far-UVC and portable HEPA air cleaners against the bacteriophage MS2 as a surrogate for human viral pathogens. For both technologies, changing the media used to aerosolize the microorganism from deionized water to a simulated saliva doubled effectiveness metrics (both log10 reductions and clean air delivery rates). Because reductions did not follow first order, log–linear dynamics, using different segments of the test period to calculate efficacy also significantly impacted reported performance. Evidence shown here indicates that both microbiological and particle dynamics likely play a role in impacting test outcomes under current methods, and more research is needed to improve repeatable and reliable standardized approaches for determining technology performance against infectious aerosols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信