Parisa Mirkhorli, Mohammad Bagherzadeh, Hossein Mohammadnezhad, Amir Ghaderi* and Ozgur Kisi,
{"title":"Energy Dissipation Prediction for Trapezoidal–Triangular Labyrinth Weirs Based on Soft Computing Techniques: A Comparison","authors":"Parisa Mirkhorli, Mohammad Bagherzadeh, Hossein Mohammadnezhad, Amir Ghaderi* and Ozgur Kisi, ","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0119210.1021/acsestwater.4c01192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The present study aimed at determining the relative energy dissipation (ED) of trapezoidal-triangular labyrinth weirs (TTLWs) using soft computing methods such as neural networks, i.e., multilayer perceptron and radical basis function, support vector machine (SVM), and multivariate adaptive regression splines, using three different scenarios. Its performance was evaluated using a variety of performance indices. Observations indicate that TTLW typically expends the most energy because of the collisions of the nappes at the upstream apexes and the circulating flow in the pool formed behind the nappes. Furthermore, as the weir sidewall angle and height increase, the ED tends to decrease. The results of the models demonstrate that while all methods performed reasonably well in predicting the ED of TTLWs, the ANN-MLP and SVM models were more accurate. Specifically, the ANN-MLP model showed superior performance, with mean absolute percentage error, RMSE, DC, and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values of 1.21, 0.009, 0.989, and 0.991, respectively, for the testing data set. The outcomes of the sensitivity analysis indicate that relative critical depth (<i>y</i><sub>c</sub>/<i>E</i><sub>0</sub>) and, after that, the angle of the LW wall (α) are the most effective factors in determining the TTLW relative ED in all methods. Overall, the comparison of model outcomes indicates that the ANN-MLP model is highly effective in predicting the ED of TTLWs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 3","pages":"1453–1468 1453–1468"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c01192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在利用神经网络(即多层感知器和激基函数)、支持向量机(SVM)和多元自适应回归样条等软计算方法,在三种不同情况下确定梯形-三角形迷宫堰(TTLWs)的相对能量耗散(ED)。使用各种性能指标对其性能进行了评估。观察结果表明,TTLW 通常消耗的能量最大,因为上游顶点的堰塞和堰塞后面形成的水池中的循环流会发生碰撞。此外,随着堰侧壁角度和高度的增大,ED 有减小的趋势。模型结果表明,虽然所有方法在预测 TTLW 的 ED 方面都有相当好的表现,但 ANN-MLP 和 SVM 模型更为准确。具体来说,ANN-MLP 模型表现更优,测试数据集的平均绝对百分比误差、RMSE、DC 和 R2 值分别为 1.21、0.009、0.989 和 0.991。敏感性分析结果表明,在所有方法中,相对临界深度(yc/E0)和 LW 壁角度(α)是决定 TTLW 相对 ED 的最有效因素。总体而言,模型结果比较表明,ANN-MLP 模型在预测 TTLW 的 ED 方面非常有效。
Energy Dissipation Prediction for Trapezoidal–Triangular Labyrinth Weirs Based on Soft Computing Techniques: A Comparison
The present study aimed at determining the relative energy dissipation (ED) of trapezoidal-triangular labyrinth weirs (TTLWs) using soft computing methods such as neural networks, i.e., multilayer perceptron and radical basis function, support vector machine (SVM), and multivariate adaptive regression splines, using three different scenarios. Its performance was evaluated using a variety of performance indices. Observations indicate that TTLW typically expends the most energy because of the collisions of the nappes at the upstream apexes and the circulating flow in the pool formed behind the nappes. Furthermore, as the weir sidewall angle and height increase, the ED tends to decrease. The results of the models demonstrate that while all methods performed reasonably well in predicting the ED of TTLWs, the ANN-MLP and SVM models were more accurate. Specifically, the ANN-MLP model showed superior performance, with mean absolute percentage error, RMSE, DC, and R2 values of 1.21, 0.009, 0.989, and 0.991, respectively, for the testing data set. The outcomes of the sensitivity analysis indicate that relative critical depth (yc/E0) and, after that, the angle of the LW wall (α) are the most effective factors in determining the TTLW relative ED in all methods. Overall, the comparison of model outcomes indicates that the ANN-MLP model is highly effective in predicting the ED of TTLWs.