Adam J N Raymakers, Victor L Van de Wiele, Aaron S Kesselheim, S Sean Tu
{"title":"行政专利挑战后生物药品收入的变化。","authors":"Adam J N Raymakers, Victor L Van de Wiele, Aaron S Kesselheim, S Sean Tu","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2012, the America Invents Act created a new administrative pathway called inter partes review to allow challenges to patents as being improperly granted, including patents associated with brand-name prescription drugs that block timely competition. Manufacturers of expensive biologic drugs often obtain large numbers of patents on drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration, which can make it harder for other manufacturers to market their own biosimilar versions of the products. We found that biologic drugs were associated with forty-three administrative patent challenges via inter partes review during the period 2012-21 that resulted in final written decisions. Biosimilar manufacturers used this pathway in twenty cases to invalidate fourteen patents, typically directed to new methods of treatment. By contrast, biologic manufacturers selling competing brand-name products in the same drug class used this pathway to invalidate seventeen patents in the twenty-three challenges they brought, typically directed to active drug ingredients. After patent invalidation by biosimilar firms, revenues for the originator products tended to decrease, a signal of more effective competition making drugs more accessible for the benefit of patients and payers.</p>","PeriodicalId":519943,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","volume":"44 3","pages":"274-279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes In Biologic Drug Revenues After Administrative Patent Challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Adam J N Raymakers, Victor L Van de Wiele, Aaron S Kesselheim, S Sean Tu\",\"doi\":\"10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2012, the America Invents Act created a new administrative pathway called inter partes review to allow challenges to patents as being improperly granted, including patents associated with brand-name prescription drugs that block timely competition. Manufacturers of expensive biologic drugs often obtain large numbers of patents on drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration, which can make it harder for other manufacturers to market their own biosimilar versions of the products. We found that biologic drugs were associated with forty-three administrative patent challenges via inter partes review during the period 2012-21 that resulted in final written decisions. Biosimilar manufacturers used this pathway in twenty cases to invalidate fourteen patents, typically directed to new methods of treatment. By contrast, biologic manufacturers selling competing brand-name products in the same drug class used this pathway to invalidate seventeen patents in the twenty-three challenges they brought, typically directed to active drug ingredients. After patent invalidation by biosimilar firms, revenues for the originator products tended to decrease, a signal of more effective competition making drugs more accessible for the benefit of patients and payers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs (Project Hope)\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"274-279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs (Project Hope)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2012年,《美国发明法案》(american Invents Act)创建了一个名为“当事人间审查”(inter - parties review)的新行政途径,允许对不恰当授予的专利提出质疑,包括与阻碍及时竞争的名牌处方药相关的专利。昂贵生物药物的制造商通常会获得美国食品和药物管理局(Food and Drug Administration)批准的大量药物专利,这可能会使其他制造商更难销售自己的生物仿制药。我们发现,在2012-21年期间,通过多方审查,生物药物与43项行政专利挑战相关,并产生最终书面决定。生物仿制药制造商在20个案例中使用这一途径使14项专利无效,这些专利通常针对新的治疗方法。相比之下,生物制剂制造商在同一药物类别中销售竞争品牌产品,他们通过这一途径在23项挑战中使17项专利无效,这些挑战通常针对有效药物成分。在生物仿制药公司的专利无效之后,原始产品的收入往往会减少,这是一个信号,表明更有效的竞争使药物更容易获得,从而使患者和付款人受益。
Changes In Biologic Drug Revenues After Administrative Patent Challenges.
In 2012, the America Invents Act created a new administrative pathway called inter partes review to allow challenges to patents as being improperly granted, including patents associated with brand-name prescription drugs that block timely competition. Manufacturers of expensive biologic drugs often obtain large numbers of patents on drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration, which can make it harder for other manufacturers to market their own biosimilar versions of the products. We found that biologic drugs were associated with forty-three administrative patent challenges via inter partes review during the period 2012-21 that resulted in final written decisions. Biosimilar manufacturers used this pathway in twenty cases to invalidate fourteen patents, typically directed to new methods of treatment. By contrast, biologic manufacturers selling competing brand-name products in the same drug class used this pathway to invalidate seventeen patents in the twenty-three challenges they brought, typically directed to active drug ingredients. After patent invalidation by biosimilar firms, revenues for the originator products tended to decrease, a signal of more effective competition making drugs more accessible for the benefit of patients and payers.