某城市教学医院医生沟通患者体验调查得分低于“顶盒”的独立危险因素分析

Richard H Savel, Payam Benson, Carmen Collins, Srinivas Gongireddy, Christina Oquendo, Kwaku Gyekye, Eva Villar-Trinidad, Jill Fennimore, Ije Akunyili
{"title":"某城市教学医院医生沟通患者体验调查得分低于“顶盒”的独立危险因素分析","authors":"Richard H Savel, Payam Benson, Carmen Collins, Srinivas Gongireddy, Christina Oquendo, Kwaku Gyekye, Eva Villar-Trinidad, Jill Fennimore, Ije Akunyili","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the independent risk factors for patients giving a less than \"top box\" score on their Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys in the \"doctor communication\" domain (DCD). After adjusting for age, gender, length of stay, receiving a postdischarge phone call (PC), new medication during hospitalization, highest education level, language spoken at home, and zip code, results from 803 HCAHPS surveys (from January 1 to December 31, 2023) revealed that not receiving a PC was associated with a more than doubling of the odds that a patient would give less than a \"top box\" score for the DCD (overall adjusted odds ratio of 2.22; 95% confidence interval: 1.77-2.78) and a nearly doubling the actual probability of doing so (34.3% less than \"top box\" score if no PC, 17.9% less than \"top box\" score if PC). These findings support the potential value of a post-discharge patient PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independent Risk Factors for Less Than \\\"Top Box\\\" Doctor Communication Patient Experience Survey Scores in an Urban Teaching Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Richard H Savel, Payam Benson, Carmen Collins, Srinivas Gongireddy, Christina Oquendo, Kwaku Gyekye, Eva Villar-Trinidad, Jill Fennimore, Ije Akunyili\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explored the independent risk factors for patients giving a less than \\\"top box\\\" score on their Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys in the \\\"doctor communication\\\" domain (DCD). After adjusting for age, gender, length of stay, receiving a postdischarge phone call (PC), new medication during hospitalization, highest education level, language spoken at home, and zip code, results from 803 HCAHPS surveys (from January 1 to December 31, 2023) revealed that not receiving a PC was associated with a more than doubling of the odds that a patient would give less than a \\\"top box\\\" score for the DCD (overall adjusted odds ratio of 2.22; 95% confidence interval: 1.77-2.78) and a nearly doubling the actual probability of doing so (34.3% less than \\\"top box\\\" score if no PC, 17.9% less than \\\"top box\\\" score if PC). These findings support the potential value of a post-discharge patient PC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在“医生沟通”领域(DCD)的医院消费者医疗服务提供者和系统评估(HCAHPS)调查中得分低于“顶框”的患者的独立风险因素。在调整了年龄、性别、住院时间、出院后接到电话(PC)、住院期间服用的新药物、最高教育程度、家中使用的语言和邮政编码等因素后,803项HCAHPS调查(从2023年1月1日至12月31日)的结果显示,没有接到电话与患者给出的DCD得分低于“顶盒”分数的几率增加了一倍以上相关(总体调整后的优势比为2.22;95%置信区间:1.77-2.78),实际发生这种情况的概率几乎翻了一倍(如果没有PC,则比“顶盒”得分低34.3%,如果有PC,则比“顶盒”得分低17.9%)。这些发现支持了出院后患者PC的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Independent Risk Factors for Less Than "Top Box" Doctor Communication Patient Experience Survey Scores in an Urban Teaching Hospital.

This study explored the independent risk factors for patients giving a less than "top box" score on their Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys in the "doctor communication" domain (DCD). After adjusting for age, gender, length of stay, receiving a postdischarge phone call (PC), new medication during hospitalization, highest education level, language spoken at home, and zip code, results from 803 HCAHPS surveys (from January 1 to December 31, 2023) revealed that not receiving a PC was associated with a more than doubling of the odds that a patient would give less than a "top box" score for the DCD (overall adjusted odds ratio of 2.22; 95% confidence interval: 1.77-2.78) and a nearly doubling the actual probability of doing so (34.3% less than "top box" score if no PC, 17.9% less than "top box" score if PC). These findings support the potential value of a post-discharge patient PC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信