早期表面活性剂能改善晚期早产儿的预后吗?新生儿重症监护病房回顾性研究。

Jorge Bartual Bardisa, Carolina Vizcaíno Díaz, María Jesús Ferrández Berenguer
{"title":"早期表面活性剂能改善晚期早产儿的预后吗?新生儿重症监护病房回顾性研究。","authors":"Jorge Bartual Bardisa, Carolina Vizcaíno Díaz, María Jesús Ferrández Berenguer","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the early administration of surfactant, before 12 h of life, versus late, in late preterm neonates (born between 34<sup>+0</sup> and 36<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation), with moderate-severe respiratory distress.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, observational, analytical, case-control study, with late preterm infants admitted between 2012-2021. It is divided into 2 groups: surfactant administered ≤ 12 h of life and >12 h and evolution is compared using univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) level III of a Universitary Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients or participants: </strong>57 patients, 30 in the early group and 27 in the late group.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>neonates from 34<sup>+0</sup> to 36<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation, with respiratory distress syndrome, in need of non-invasive ventilation and surfactant.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>Sociodemographic, clinical and evolutionary: redosing, duration of respiratory support, oxygen and time to stop requiring it after surfactant. Also, complications and length of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the early group there was less need for redosing (3.3% vs 48.1%, P < .001) and a decrease in duration, in days, of stay in the NICU (7 vs 10.5, P .002), invasive mechanical ventilation (2.4 vs 3.9, P .034), total respiratory support (4.6 vs 6.6, P .005) and oxygen therapy (0.4 vs 2.8, P < .001). Also, lower incidence of pneumothorax (0% vs 33.3%, P .001). Furthermore, 12 h after administration, 83.4% maintained FiO2 0.21, compared to 44.4% in the late administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, early administration in late preterm infants provides benefits in terms of respiratory assistance and complications. We suggest expanding studies to establish recommendations in this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":"502161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does early surfactant improve outcome in late preterm newborn? Retrospective study in a neonatal intensive care unit.\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Bartual Bardisa, Carolina Vizcaíno Díaz, María Jesús Ferrández Berenguer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the early administration of surfactant, before 12 h of life, versus late, in late preterm neonates (born between 34<sup>+0</sup> and 36<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation), with moderate-severe respiratory distress.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, observational, analytical, case-control study, with late preterm infants admitted between 2012-2021. It is divided into 2 groups: surfactant administered ≤ 12 h of life and >12 h and evolution is compared using univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) level III of a Universitary Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients or participants: </strong>57 patients, 30 in the early group and 27 in the late group.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>neonates from 34<sup>+0</sup> to 36<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation, with respiratory distress syndrome, in need of non-invasive ventilation and surfactant.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>Sociodemographic, clinical and evolutionary: redosing, duration of respiratory support, oxygen and time to stop requiring it after surfactant. Also, complications and length of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the early group there was less need for redosing (3.3% vs 48.1%, P < .001) and a decrease in duration, in days, of stay in the NICU (7 vs 10.5, P .002), invasive mechanical ventilation (2.4 vs 3.9, P .034), total respiratory support (4.6 vs 6.6, P .005) and oxygen therapy (0.4 vs 2.8, P < .001). Also, lower incidence of pneumothorax (0% vs 33.3%, P .001). Furthermore, 12 h after administration, 83.4% maintained FiO2 0.21, compared to 44.4% in the late administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, early administration in late preterm infants provides benefits in terms of respiratory assistance and complications. We suggest expanding studies to establish recommendations in this group of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"502161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较中重度呼吸窘迫的晚期早产儿(妊娠34+0 ~ 36+6周)在出生后12 h之前早期给药与晚期给药的差异。设计:回顾性、观察性、分析性、病例对照研究,研究对象为2012-2021年间入院的晚期早产儿。将其分为两组:表面活性剂给药 ≤ 12 h的寿命和>12 h的寿命,并采用单变量分析比较进化。环境:大学医院新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)三级。患者或参与者:57例患者,早期组30例,晚期组27例。纳入标准:妊娠34+0 ~ 36+6周,伴有呼吸窘迫综合征,需要无创通气和表面活性剂的新生儿。干预措施:没有。感兴趣的主要变量:社会人口统计学、临床和进化:再给药、呼吸支持持续时间、氧气和表面活性剂后停止需要它的时间。还有并发症和住院时间。结果:在早期组中,重新给药的需求较少(3.3% vs 48.1%, P )。结论:在我们的研究中,晚期早产儿早期给药在呼吸辅助和并发症方面有好处。我们建议扩大研究,在这组患者中建立推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does early surfactant improve outcome in late preterm newborn? Retrospective study in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Objective: To compare the early administration of surfactant, before 12 h of life, versus late, in late preterm neonates (born between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks of gestation), with moderate-severe respiratory distress.

Design: Retrospective, observational, analytical, case-control study, with late preterm infants admitted between 2012-2021. It is divided into 2 groups: surfactant administered ≤ 12 h of life and >12 h and evolution is compared using univariate analysis.

Setting: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) level III of a Universitary Hospital.

Patients or participants: 57 patients, 30 in the early group and 27 in the late group.

Inclusion criteria: neonates from 34+0 to 36+6 weeks of gestation, with respiratory distress syndrome, in need of non-invasive ventilation and surfactant.

Interventions: None.

Main variables of interest: Sociodemographic, clinical and evolutionary: redosing, duration of respiratory support, oxygen and time to stop requiring it after surfactant. Also, complications and length of hospitalization.

Results: In the early group there was less need for redosing (3.3% vs 48.1%, P < .001) and a decrease in duration, in days, of stay in the NICU (7 vs 10.5, P .002), invasive mechanical ventilation (2.4 vs 3.9, P .034), total respiratory support (4.6 vs 6.6, P .005) and oxygen therapy (0.4 vs 2.8, P < .001). Also, lower incidence of pneumothorax (0% vs 33.3%, P .001). Furthermore, 12 h after administration, 83.4% maintained FiO2 0.21, compared to 44.4% in the late administration.

Conclusions: In our study, early administration in late preterm infants provides benefits in terms of respiratory assistance and complications. We suggest expanding studies to establish recommendations in this group of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信