最大限度地提高2型糖尿病缓解的潜力:DiRECT-Aus实施试验的规模和可持续性考虑

Nilakshi Gunatillaka, Jenny Advocat, Lauren Ball, Terry Haines, Cylie Williams, Tze Lin Chai, Mitchell Bowden, Melissa Savaglio, Kate Gudorf, Elizabeth Sturgiss
{"title":"最大限度地提高2型糖尿病缓解的潜力:DiRECT-Aus实施试验的规模和可持续性考虑","authors":"Nilakshi Gunatillaka, Jenny Advocat, Lauren Ball, Terry Haines, Cylie Williams, Tze Lin Chai, Mitchell Bowden, Melissa Savaglio, Kate Gudorf, Elizabeth Sturgiss","doi":"10.1071/PY24116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Approximately 500 million people worldwide live with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The UK's 'Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial' (DiRECT) is a potential novel method for care. An Australian trial of DiRECT (DiRECT-Aus) showed that 56% of participants achieved diabetes remission at 12months. We explored the experiences of patients, clinicians and trial partners involved in DiRECT-Aus to ascertain the acceptability and feasibility of DiRECT-Aus, as well as factors influencing implementation, to inform recommendations for sustainable scale up into mainstream primary care. Methods This qualitative implementation research conducted within a constructivist paradigm involved semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Data analysis followed an inductive thematic approach, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results Patients (n =14), general practitioners (n =3), practice nurses (n =6), dietitians (n =7) and DiRECT-Aus trial partners (n =5) were interviewed. We identified four core components of DiRECT-Aus that are essential for implementation and scale up. They were: (1) access to very low-energy diet products; (2) high frequency of contact with the dietitian; (3) dietitian's clinical knowledge and patient-centred practice; and (4) absence of financial costs to patients. Several additional factors that could support implementation and suggested funding models are described. Conclusions This study concludes that DiRECT-Aus was acceptable and feasible to patients and clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"31 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maximising the potential of type 2 diabetes remission: scale up and sustainability considerations from the DiRECT-Aus implementation trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nilakshi Gunatillaka, Jenny Advocat, Lauren Ball, Terry Haines, Cylie Williams, Tze Lin Chai, Mitchell Bowden, Melissa Savaglio, Kate Gudorf, Elizabeth Sturgiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/PY24116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Approximately 500 million people worldwide live with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The UK's 'Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial' (DiRECT) is a potential novel method for care. An Australian trial of DiRECT (DiRECT-Aus) showed that 56% of participants achieved diabetes remission at 12months. We explored the experiences of patients, clinicians and trial partners involved in DiRECT-Aus to ascertain the acceptability and feasibility of DiRECT-Aus, as well as factors influencing implementation, to inform recommendations for sustainable scale up into mainstream primary care. Methods This qualitative implementation research conducted within a constructivist paradigm involved semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Data analysis followed an inductive thematic approach, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results Patients (n =14), general practitioners (n =3), practice nurses (n =6), dietitians (n =7) and DiRECT-Aus trial partners (n =5) were interviewed. We identified four core components of DiRECT-Aus that are essential for implementation and scale up. They were: (1) access to very low-energy diet products; (2) high frequency of contact with the dietitian; (3) dietitian's clinical knowledge and patient-centred practice; and (4) absence of financial costs to patients. Several additional factors that could support implementation and suggested funding models are described. Conclusions This study concludes that DiRECT-Aus was acceptable and feasible to patients and clinicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球约有5亿人患有2型糖尿病。英国的“糖尿病缓解临床试验”(DiRECT)是一种潜在的新型治疗方法。澳大利亚的一项DiRECT (DiRECT- aus)试验显示,56%的参与者在12个月时达到了糖尿病缓解。我们探讨了参与直接辅助治疗的患者、临床医生和试验伙伴的经验,以确定直接辅助治疗的可接受性和可行性,以及影响实施的因素,为可持续地扩大到主流初级保健提供建议。方法在建构主义范式下进行的定性实施研究涉及与关键利益相关者的半结构化访谈。数据分析采用了归纳性专题方法,参考了《执行研究综合框架》。结果对患者(n =14)、全科医生(n =3)、执业护士(n =6)、营养师(n =7)和直接aus试验伙伴(n =5)进行了访谈。我们确定了直接au的四个核心组成部分,它们对于实施和扩大规模至关重要。它们是:(1)获得非常低能量的饮食产品;(2)与营养师接触频率高;(3)营养师的临床知识和以患者为中心的实践;(4)没有给患者带来经济成本。还描述了可以支持实施的其他几个因素和建议的筹资模式。结论对患者和临床医生来说,直接aus是可以接受和可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maximising the potential of type 2 diabetes remission: scale up and sustainability considerations from the DiRECT-Aus implementation trial.

Background Approximately 500 million people worldwide live with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The UK's 'Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial' (DiRECT) is a potential novel method for care. An Australian trial of DiRECT (DiRECT-Aus) showed that 56% of participants achieved diabetes remission at 12months. We explored the experiences of patients, clinicians and trial partners involved in DiRECT-Aus to ascertain the acceptability and feasibility of DiRECT-Aus, as well as factors influencing implementation, to inform recommendations for sustainable scale up into mainstream primary care. Methods This qualitative implementation research conducted within a constructivist paradigm involved semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Data analysis followed an inductive thematic approach, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results Patients (n =14), general practitioners (n =3), practice nurses (n =6), dietitians (n =7) and DiRECT-Aus trial partners (n =5) were interviewed. We identified four core components of DiRECT-Aus that are essential for implementation and scale up. They were: (1) access to very low-energy diet products; (2) high frequency of contact with the dietitian; (3) dietitian's clinical knowledge and patient-centred practice; and (4) absence of financial costs to patients. Several additional factors that could support implementation and suggested funding models are described. Conclusions This study concludes that DiRECT-Aus was acceptable and feasible to patients and clinicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信