Mohamed Dafaalla, Francesco Costa, Haibo Jia, Harindra Wijeysundera, Muhammad Rashid, Michelle M Graham, Wojtek Wojakowski, Alaide Chieffo, Gary S Mintz, Mamas A Mamas
{"title":"活动期癌症患者st段抬高型心肌梗死后的缺血和出血风险:一项全国性研究","authors":"Mohamed Dafaalla, Francesco Costa, Haibo Jia, Harindra Wijeysundera, Muhammad Rashid, Michelle M Graham, Wojtek Wojakowski, Alaide Chieffo, Gary S Mintz, Mamas A Mamas","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Treatment of patients with cancer presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is complex given the increased risk of both thrombotic and major bleeding complications.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients between January 2005 and March 2019 was obtained from the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project and the UK National Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care registries. The primary outcomes were major bleeding and re-infarction at 1 year following admission with STEMI. Major bleeding was defined as bleeding events that require hospital admission. Re-infarction was defined as acute MI according to the fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. A total of 322 776 STEMI-indexed admissions were identified between January 2005 and March 2019. Of those, 7050 (2.2%) patients were diagnosed with active cancer. Cancer patients were older with more cardiovascular comorbidities. Cancer patients received invasive coronary angiography (62.2% vs. 72.7%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (58.4% vs. 69.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) less often compared with patients without cancer and were less likely to be prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy (85% vs. 95.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The incidence of major bleeding (6.5% vs. 3.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and re-infarction (cancer 5.7%, no cancer 5.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.01) was higher in cancer patients at 1 year. After adjustment for differences in baseline covariates, a similar risk of re-infarction (sub-hazard ratios (SHR) 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.27) and a 50% increased risk of major bleeding (SHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.30-1.71) were observed in cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with non-cancer patients, cancer patients have a higher risk of major bleeding but not of re-infarction. Mitigating bleeding risk in STEMI patients with cancer is of paramount importance to improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 2","pages":"oeaf012"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ischaemic and bleeding risk after ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with active cancer: a nationwide study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Dafaalla, Francesco Costa, Haibo Jia, Harindra Wijeysundera, Muhammad Rashid, Michelle M Graham, Wojtek Wojakowski, Alaide Chieffo, Gary S Mintz, Mamas A Mamas\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Treatment of patients with cancer presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is complex given the increased risk of both thrombotic and major bleeding complications.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients between January 2005 and March 2019 was obtained from the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project and the UK National Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care registries. The primary outcomes were major bleeding and re-infarction at 1 year following admission with STEMI. Major bleeding was defined as bleeding events that require hospital admission. Re-infarction was defined as acute MI according to the fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. A total of 322 776 STEMI-indexed admissions were identified between January 2005 and March 2019. Of those, 7050 (2.2%) patients were diagnosed with active cancer. Cancer patients were older with more cardiovascular comorbidities. Cancer patients received invasive coronary angiography (62.2% vs. 72.7%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (58.4% vs. 69.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) less often compared with patients without cancer and were less likely to be prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy (85% vs. 95.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The incidence of major bleeding (6.5% vs. 3.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and re-infarction (cancer 5.7%, no cancer 5.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.01) was higher in cancer patients at 1 year. After adjustment for differences in baseline covariates, a similar risk of re-infarction (sub-hazard ratios (SHR) 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.27) and a 50% increased risk of major bleeding (SHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.30-1.71) were observed in cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with non-cancer patients, cancer patients have a higher risk of major bleeding but not of re-infarction. Mitigating bleeding risk in STEMI patients with cancer is of paramount importance to improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal open\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"oeaf012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:考虑到血栓性和大出血并发症的风险增加,伴有st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的癌症患者的治疗是复杂的。方法和结果:从英国心肌梗死国家审计项目和英国国家医院事件统计入院患者护理登记处获得2005年1月至2019年3月期间STEMI患者的全国相关队列。主要结局是STEMI患者入院后1年大出血和再梗死。大出血被定义为需要住院的出血事件。根据心肌梗死的第四种通用定义,将再梗死定义为急性心肌梗死。2005年1月至2019年3月期间,共确定了322 776例stemi索引招生。其中,7050例(2.2%)患者被诊断为活动性癌症。癌症患者年龄较大,心血管合并症较多。与非癌症患者相比,癌症患者接受侵入性冠状动脉造影(62.2%对72.7%,P < 0.001)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(58.4%对69.5%,P < 0.001)的频率更低,接受双重抗血小板治疗的可能性更小(85%对95.4%,P < 0.001)。肿瘤患者1年时大出血(6.5% vs. 3.5%, P < 0.001)和再梗死(癌变5.7%,无癌变5.1%,P = 0.01)发生率较高。在调整基线协变量的差异后,在癌症患者中观察到类似的再梗死风险(亚危险比(SHR) 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.27)和50%的大出血风险增加(SHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.30-1.71)。结论:与非肿瘤患者相比,肿瘤患者发生大出血的风险较高,但再梗死的风险不高。降低STEMI合并癌症患者的出血风险对改善预后至关重要。
Ischaemic and bleeding risk after ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with active cancer: a nationwide study.
Aims: Treatment of patients with cancer presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is complex given the increased risk of both thrombotic and major bleeding complications.
Methods and results: A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients between January 2005 and March 2019 was obtained from the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project and the UK National Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care registries. The primary outcomes were major bleeding and re-infarction at 1 year following admission with STEMI. Major bleeding was defined as bleeding events that require hospital admission. Re-infarction was defined as acute MI according to the fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. A total of 322 776 STEMI-indexed admissions were identified between January 2005 and March 2019. Of those, 7050 (2.2%) patients were diagnosed with active cancer. Cancer patients were older with more cardiovascular comorbidities. Cancer patients received invasive coronary angiography (62.2% vs. 72.7%, P < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (58.4% vs. 69.5%, P < 0.001) less often compared with patients without cancer and were less likely to be prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy (85% vs. 95.4%, P < 0.001). The incidence of major bleeding (6.5% vs. 3.5%, P < 0.001) and re-infarction (cancer 5.7%, no cancer 5.1%, P = 0.01) was higher in cancer patients at 1 year. After adjustment for differences in baseline covariates, a similar risk of re-infarction (sub-hazard ratios (SHR) 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.27) and a 50% increased risk of major bleeding (SHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.30-1.71) were observed in cancer patients.
Conclusion: Compared with non-cancer patients, cancer patients have a higher risk of major bleeding but not of re-infarction. Mitigating bleeding risk in STEMI patients with cancer is of paramount importance to improve outcomes.