经股骨关节结合坐骨神经 RPNI 术后疼痛和假体磨损的变化。

Kirby W Bonvillain, Ainsley K Bloomer, G Dillon Graham, Ryan P Serbin, Rachel B Seymour, Joseph R Hsu, Bryan Loeffler
{"title":"经股骨关节结合坐骨神经 RPNI 术后疼痛和假体磨损的变化。","authors":"Kirby W Bonvillain, Ainsley K Bloomer, G Dillon Graham, Ryan P Serbin, Rachel B Seymour, Joseph R Hsu, Bryan Loeffler","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osseointegration (OI) has revolutionized prosthetic rehabilitation for amputees. Despite its contributions, postamputation pain remains a significant problem. This study aims to investigate the role of sciatic nerve regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) in patients undergoing transfemoral OI, focusing on its impact on pain and prosthetic wear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients underwent OI in a staged manner with RPNI being performed at either stage I or II. Outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative numerical rating scale phantom and residual limb pain (RLP) scores, presence of Tinel sign on physical examination, opioid use, and prosthetic wear. Data were collected through interviews using a standardized script to ensure consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 patients were included. The patients were reported among cohorts without comorbidities (RPNIw/oC, N = 9) and with comorbidities (RPNIwC, N = 3). The average phantom limb pain (PLP) score decreased by 3.66 in the RPNIw/oC group and 3 in the RPNIw/C group. The RLP score saw an average increase of 0.28 in the RPNIw/oC group and a decrease of 3.33 in the RPNIw/C group. The frequency of a positive Tinel sign went from 2/9 to 0/9 in the RPNIw/oC group and remained constant in the RPNIwC group at 1/3. Finally, the RPNIw/oC group saw an increase in prosthetic wear from 4 h/d preoperatively to 8.2 h/d postoperatively, and the RPNIwC group saw an increase from 2.67 h/d to 7 h/d. No patients required nerve-related revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This small case series demonstrates improvement in phantom limb pain and prosthesis wear after combined transfemoral OI and sciatic nerve RPNI.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"8 1 Suppl","pages":"e385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in pain and prosthesis wear following transfemoral osseointegration combined with sciatic nerve RPNI.\",\"authors\":\"Kirby W Bonvillain, Ainsley K Bloomer, G Dillon Graham, Ryan P Serbin, Rachel B Seymour, Joseph R Hsu, Bryan Loeffler\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osseointegration (OI) has revolutionized prosthetic rehabilitation for amputees. Despite its contributions, postamputation pain remains a significant problem. This study aims to investigate the role of sciatic nerve regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) in patients undergoing transfemoral OI, focusing on its impact on pain and prosthetic wear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients underwent OI in a staged manner with RPNI being performed at either stage I or II. Outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative numerical rating scale phantom and residual limb pain (RLP) scores, presence of Tinel sign on physical examination, opioid use, and prosthetic wear. Data were collected through interviews using a standardized script to ensure consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 patients were included. The patients were reported among cohorts without comorbidities (RPNIw/oC, N = 9) and with comorbidities (RPNIwC, N = 3). The average phantom limb pain (PLP) score decreased by 3.66 in the RPNIw/oC group and 3 in the RPNIw/C group. The RLP score saw an average increase of 0.28 in the RPNIw/oC group and a decrease of 3.33 in the RPNIw/C group. The frequency of a positive Tinel sign went from 2/9 to 0/9 in the RPNIw/oC group and remained constant in the RPNIwC group at 1/3. Finally, the RPNIw/oC group saw an increase in prosthetic wear from 4 h/d preoperatively to 8.2 h/d postoperatively, and the RPNIwC group saw an increase from 2.67 h/d to 7 h/d. No patients required nerve-related revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This small case series demonstrates improvement in phantom limb pain and prosthesis wear after combined transfemoral OI and sciatic nerve RPNI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma\",\"volume\":\"8 1 Suppl\",\"pages\":\"e385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892708/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in pain and prosthesis wear following transfemoral osseointegration combined with sciatic nerve RPNI.

Background: Osseointegration (OI) has revolutionized prosthetic rehabilitation for amputees. Despite its contributions, postamputation pain remains a significant problem. This study aims to investigate the role of sciatic nerve regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) in patients undergoing transfemoral OI, focusing on its impact on pain and prosthetic wear.

Methods: Patients underwent OI in a staged manner with RPNI being performed at either stage I or II. Outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative numerical rating scale phantom and residual limb pain (RLP) scores, presence of Tinel sign on physical examination, opioid use, and prosthetic wear. Data were collected through interviews using a standardized script to ensure consistency.

Results: A total of 12 patients were included. The patients were reported among cohorts without comorbidities (RPNIw/oC, N = 9) and with comorbidities (RPNIwC, N = 3). The average phantom limb pain (PLP) score decreased by 3.66 in the RPNIw/oC group and 3 in the RPNIw/C group. The RLP score saw an average increase of 0.28 in the RPNIw/oC group and a decrease of 3.33 in the RPNIw/C group. The frequency of a positive Tinel sign went from 2/9 to 0/9 in the RPNIw/oC group and remained constant in the RPNIwC group at 1/3. Finally, the RPNIw/oC group saw an increase in prosthetic wear from 4 h/d preoperatively to 8.2 h/d postoperatively, and the RPNIwC group saw an increase from 2.67 h/d to 7 h/d. No patients required nerve-related revision surgery.

Conclusion: This small case series demonstrates improvement in phantom limb pain and prosthesis wear after combined transfemoral OI and sciatic nerve RPNI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信