LGBTQ2S+家庭孕期护理经验社区调查的可行性

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Molly R Altman, Teresa van Winkle, Brittany Ferrell, A J Lowik, Kodiak R S Soled, Lesley A Tarasoff, Jeanette McCulloch, Kathrin Stoll, Juno Obedin-Maliver, Saraswathi Vedam
{"title":"LGBTQ2S+家庭孕期护理经验社区调查的可行性","authors":"Molly R Altman, Teresa van Winkle, Brittany Ferrell, A J Lowik, Kodiak R S Soled, Lesley A Tarasoff, Jeanette McCulloch, Kathrin Stoll, Juno Obedin-Maliver, Saraswathi Vedam","doi":"10.1111/birt.12911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite increased recognition of and support for family building among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, Two-Spirit, and other sexual and gender minoritized (LGBTQ2S+) populations, there is still little evidence describing the experiences of pregnancy care within these populations in quantifiable ways. This paper describes our pilot study process and the feasibility of implementing a community-developed survey measuring respectful pregnancy care within LGBTQ2S+ communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a participatory action research approach, a Community Steering Council developed and piloted the Birth Includes Us survey. To assess the feasibility of the survey, recruitment was assessed through how participants heard about the study, and enrollment and survey completion were tracked in the REDCap survey platform. We used descriptive statistics to report the demographics of the pilot sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment through social media, predominantly Facebook, was an effective route to reach the target population, accounting for over 60% of the sample. Of the 404 eligible participants who opened the survey, 91% completed the survey. The pilot study sample represented 41/50 states in the USA and 5/13 provinces and territories across Canada. While only 17% of the sample were members of racially minoritized communities, there was wide representation across genders and sexualities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this feasibility pilot study will inform the implementation of the Birth Includes Us survey to ensure the recruitment, enrollment, and retention of diverse participants. Lessons learned from this process will also support researchers in developing mitigating strategies to minimize the harm incurred during the process of LGBTQ2S+ family building.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of a Community-Developed Survey Measuring Experiences of Pregnancy Care for LGBTQ2S+ Families.\",\"authors\":\"Molly R Altman, Teresa van Winkle, Brittany Ferrell, A J Lowik, Kodiak R S Soled, Lesley A Tarasoff, Jeanette McCulloch, Kathrin Stoll, Juno Obedin-Maliver, Saraswathi Vedam\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/birt.12911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite increased recognition of and support for family building among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, Two-Spirit, and other sexual and gender minoritized (LGBTQ2S+) populations, there is still little evidence describing the experiences of pregnancy care within these populations in quantifiable ways. This paper describes our pilot study process and the feasibility of implementing a community-developed survey measuring respectful pregnancy care within LGBTQ2S+ communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a participatory action research approach, a Community Steering Council developed and piloted the Birth Includes Us survey. To assess the feasibility of the survey, recruitment was assessed through how participants heard about the study, and enrollment and survey completion were tracked in the REDCap survey platform. We used descriptive statistics to report the demographics of the pilot sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment through social media, predominantly Facebook, was an effective route to reach the target population, accounting for over 60% of the sample. Of the 404 eligible participants who opened the survey, 91% completed the survey. The pilot study sample represented 41/50 states in the USA and 5/13 provinces and territories across Canada. While only 17% of the sample were members of racially minoritized communities, there was wide representation across genders and sexualities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this feasibility pilot study will inform the implementation of the Birth Includes Us survey to ensure the recruitment, enrollment, and retention of diverse participants. Lessons learned from this process will also support researchers in developing mitigating strategies to minimize the harm incurred during the process of LGBTQ2S+ family building.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12911\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:尽管女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿、双性恋和其他性和性别少数群体(LGBTQ2S+)对家庭建设的认识和支持有所增加,但仍然很少有证据可以量化地描述这些人群的妊娠护理经历。本文描述了我们的试点研究过程,以及在LGBTQ2S+社区实施一项社区开发的调查,以衡量尊重怀孕护理的可行性。方法:采用参与式行动研究方法,社区指导委员会制定并试行了“出生包括我们”调查。为了评估调查的可行性,通过参与者如何听说这项研究来评估招募情况,并在REDCap调查平台上跟踪招募情况和调查完成情况。我们使用描述性统计来报告试点样本的人口统计数据。结果:通过社交媒体(主要是Facebook)进行招聘是达到目标人群的有效途径,占样本的60%以上。在404名合格的参与者中,91%的人完成了调查。试点研究样本代表了美国41/50个州和加拿大5/13个省和地区。虽然只有17%的样本是少数族裔社区的成员,但在性别和性取向方面都有广泛的代表性。结论:本可行性试点研究的结果将为“出生包括我们”调查的实施提供参考,以确保招募、登记和保留不同的参与者。从这一过程中吸取的经验教训也将支持研究人员制定缓解策略,以最大限度地减少LGBTQ2S+家庭建设过程中造成的伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of a Community-Developed Survey Measuring Experiences of Pregnancy Care for LGBTQ2S+ Families.

Introduction: Despite increased recognition of and support for family building among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, Two-Spirit, and other sexual and gender minoritized (LGBTQ2S+) populations, there is still little evidence describing the experiences of pregnancy care within these populations in quantifiable ways. This paper describes our pilot study process and the feasibility of implementing a community-developed survey measuring respectful pregnancy care within LGBTQ2S+ communities.

Methods: Using a participatory action research approach, a Community Steering Council developed and piloted the Birth Includes Us survey. To assess the feasibility of the survey, recruitment was assessed through how participants heard about the study, and enrollment and survey completion were tracked in the REDCap survey platform. We used descriptive statistics to report the demographics of the pilot sample.

Results: Recruitment through social media, predominantly Facebook, was an effective route to reach the target population, accounting for over 60% of the sample. Of the 404 eligible participants who opened the survey, 91% completed the survey. The pilot study sample represented 41/50 states in the USA and 5/13 provinces and territories across Canada. While only 17% of the sample were members of racially minoritized communities, there was wide representation across genders and sexualities.

Conclusion: The findings of this feasibility pilot study will inform the implementation of the Birth Includes Us survey to ensure the recruitment, enrollment, and retention of diverse participants. Lessons learned from this process will also support researchers in developing mitigating strategies to minimize the harm incurred during the process of LGBTQ2S+ family building.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信