美国患者和医疗保健提供者对脂溢性皮炎治疗模式和患者满意度的看法。

Raj Chovatiya, Christy H Chang, Lakshi Aldredge, Candrice Heath, Moises Acevedo, David H Chu, Diane Hanna, Melissa S Seal, Matthew Zirwas
{"title":"美国患者和医疗保健提供者对脂溢性皮炎治疗模式和患者满意度的看法。","authors":"Raj Chovatiya, Christy H Chang, Lakshi Aldredge, Candrice Heath, Moises Acevedo, David H Chu, Diane Hanna, Melissa S Seal, Matthew Zirwas","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2025.2476576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) affects a large, diverse population and is associated with significant morbidity/burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Harris Poll conducted online surveys to understand the perceptions, preferences, and experiences regarding treatments of US patients with SD and dermatology healthcare providers (HCPs) from December 2021 to January 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this survey, patients using SD treatment invested on average 34 min/d treating SD with 5.9 different treatments/week (cost: ∼$650/year). HCPs underestimated duration of SD treatment (16 min/d). Most patients agreed current treatment options are too time-consuming (61%), and would be more likely to continue a regimen with fewer treatments (88%). Few patients were 'very satisfied' with treatment option affordability (19%) and prescription treatment effectiveness (25%); only 8.7% of HCPs were satisfied with prescription SD treatment options available. Most patients acknowledged SD was difficult to treat (73%) and were interested in trying new treatments (87%). HCPs expressed the need for new treatments (92%) and agreed patients would be interested in trying them (95%). Patients prioritized symptom relief over look/feel of product and regimens that could be easily incorporated into hair routines. Patients would like HCPs to consider skin tone when recommending treatments (81%) and agreed cultural background affects treatment preference (55%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest a need for SD treatments that address patient concerns/frustrations with current time-intensive complex regimens, and consider diverse hair care routines/cultural backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"36 1","pages":"2476576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and healthcare provider perspectives on treatment patterns and patient satisfaction of seborrheic dermatitis in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Raj Chovatiya, Christy H Chang, Lakshi Aldredge, Candrice Heath, Moises Acevedo, David H Chu, Diane Hanna, Melissa S Seal, Matthew Zirwas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2025.2476576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) affects a large, diverse population and is associated with significant morbidity/burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Harris Poll conducted online surveys to understand the perceptions, preferences, and experiences regarding treatments of US patients with SD and dermatology healthcare providers (HCPs) from December 2021 to January 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this survey, patients using SD treatment invested on average 34 min/d treating SD with 5.9 different treatments/week (cost: ∼$650/year). HCPs underestimated duration of SD treatment (16 min/d). Most patients agreed current treatment options are too time-consuming (61%), and would be more likely to continue a regimen with fewer treatments (88%). Few patients were 'very satisfied' with treatment option affordability (19%) and prescription treatment effectiveness (25%); only 8.7% of HCPs were satisfied with prescription SD treatment options available. Most patients acknowledged SD was difficult to treat (73%) and were interested in trying new treatments (87%). HCPs expressed the need for new treatments (92%) and agreed patients would be interested in trying them (95%). Patients prioritized symptom relief over look/feel of product and regimens that could be easily incorporated into hair routines. Patients would like HCPs to consider skin tone when recommending treatments (81%) and agreed cultural background affects treatment preference (55%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest a need for SD treatments that address patient concerns/frustrations with current time-intensive complex regimens, and consider diverse hair care routines/cultural backgrounds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"2476576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2476576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2476576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脂溢性皮炎(SD)影响大量不同的人群,并与显著的发病率/负担相关。方法:从2021年12月到2022年1月,Harris Poll进行了在线调查,以了解美国SD患者和皮肤科医疗保健提供者(HCPs)对治疗的看法、偏好和经验。结果:在这项调查中,使用SD治疗的患者平均花费34分钟/天治疗SD,每周5.9种不同的治疗(费用:约650美元/年)。HCPs低估了SD治疗的持续时间(16分钟/天)。大多数患者同意目前的治疗方案太耗时(61%),并且更有可能继续较少治疗的方案(88%)。很少有患者对治疗方案的可负担性(19%)和处方治疗效果(25%)“非常满意”;只有8.7%的HCPs对处方SD治疗方案感到满意。大多数患者承认SD难以治疗(73%),并有兴趣尝试新的治疗方法(87%)。HCPs表示需要新的治疗方法(92%),并同意患者会有兴趣尝试它们(95%)。患者优先考虑症状的缓解,而不是产品的外观/感觉和方案,可以很容易地纳入头发常规。患者希望医务人员在推荐治疗时考虑肤色(81%),认同的文化背景影响治疗偏好(55%)。结论:这些研究结果表明需要SD治疗,以解决患者对当前耗时复杂的治疗方案的担忧/沮丧,并考虑不同的头发护理程序/文化背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient and healthcare provider perspectives on treatment patterns and patient satisfaction of seborrheic dermatitis in the United States.

Introduction: Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) affects a large, diverse population and is associated with significant morbidity/burden.

Methods: The Harris Poll conducted online surveys to understand the perceptions, preferences, and experiences regarding treatments of US patients with SD and dermatology healthcare providers (HCPs) from December 2021 to January 2022.

Results: In this survey, patients using SD treatment invested on average 34 min/d treating SD with 5.9 different treatments/week (cost: ∼$650/year). HCPs underestimated duration of SD treatment (16 min/d). Most patients agreed current treatment options are too time-consuming (61%), and would be more likely to continue a regimen with fewer treatments (88%). Few patients were 'very satisfied' with treatment option affordability (19%) and prescription treatment effectiveness (25%); only 8.7% of HCPs were satisfied with prescription SD treatment options available. Most patients acknowledged SD was difficult to treat (73%) and were interested in trying new treatments (87%). HCPs expressed the need for new treatments (92%) and agreed patients would be interested in trying them (95%). Patients prioritized symptom relief over look/feel of product and regimens that could be easily incorporated into hair routines. Patients would like HCPs to consider skin tone when recommending treatments (81%) and agreed cultural background affects treatment preference (55%).

Conclusions: These findings suggest a need for SD treatments that address patient concerns/frustrations with current time-intensive complex regimens, and consider diverse hair care routines/cultural backgrounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信