局部麻醉治疗心律失常:当前文献综述。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Monica Daswani, Amit Aggarwal, Richesh Guragain
{"title":"局部麻醉治疗心律失常:当前文献综述。","authors":"Monica Daswani, Amit Aggarwal, Richesh Guragain","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>The aim is to provide a comprehensive review of regional anesthesia techniques to control ventricular arrhythmias.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While promising, the use of stellate ganglion block (SGB) for arrhythmia control is still under investigation, and further clinical trials are warranted to fully understand its efficacy, long-term outcomes, suitable patient group, and safety profile. Nevertheless, it remains a potential adjunctive therapy in the management of ventricular arrhythmias in select patients. Continuous stellate ganglion block (C-SGB) offers an alternative to single-shot SGB and thoracic epidural anesthesia for effective management in the reduction of ventricular arrhythmias until definitive treatment; it is safe and may reduce the need to repeat the single-shot block.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>SGB has been described in the literature as a successful adjunct therapy to reduce arrhythmia load. Blocking the stellate ganglion can provide transient sympathetic blockade for controlling refractory ventricular arrhythmias, otherwise uncontrolled with medication management. By regulating the sympathetic nervous system, the stellate ganglion affects the electrical conductance of the heart, and thus inhibition of the ganglion can modulate the autonomic balance with subsequent reduction in ventricular arrhythmias. These studies until 2017 were limited to case reports and case series; meta-analysis by Fudim et al. supports the use of left-sided SGB to manage ventricular arrhythmias. Recent clinical trials further strengthen the findings and favor the trend of catheter use for continuous SGB. Further studies are warranted to identify suitable patient groups and when to initiate SBG or C-SGB.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional anesthesia for arrhythmias: a review of current literature.\",\"authors\":\"Monica Daswani, Amit Aggarwal, Richesh Guragain\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>The aim is to provide a comprehensive review of regional anesthesia techniques to control ventricular arrhythmias.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While promising, the use of stellate ganglion block (SGB) for arrhythmia control is still under investigation, and further clinical trials are warranted to fully understand its efficacy, long-term outcomes, suitable patient group, and safety profile. Nevertheless, it remains a potential adjunctive therapy in the management of ventricular arrhythmias in select patients. Continuous stellate ganglion block (C-SGB) offers an alternative to single-shot SGB and thoracic epidural anesthesia for effective management in the reduction of ventricular arrhythmias until definitive treatment; it is safe and may reduce the need to repeat the single-shot block.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>SGB has been described in the literature as a successful adjunct therapy to reduce arrhythmia load. Blocking the stellate ganglion can provide transient sympathetic blockade for controlling refractory ventricular arrhythmias, otherwise uncontrolled with medication management. By regulating the sympathetic nervous system, the stellate ganglion affects the electrical conductance of the heart, and thus inhibition of the ganglion can modulate the autonomic balance with subsequent reduction in ventricular arrhythmias. These studies until 2017 were limited to case reports and case series; meta-analysis by Fudim et al. supports the use of left-sided SGB to manage ventricular arrhythmias. Recent clinical trials further strengthen the findings and favor the trend of catheter use for continuous SGB. Further studies are warranted to identify suitable patient groups and when to initiate SBG or C-SGB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001479\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述的目的:目的是提供一个全面的综述区域麻醉技术控制室性心律失常。最近的发现:虽然有希望,但使用星状神经节阻滞(SGB)控制心律失常仍在研究中,需要进一步的临床试验来充分了解其疗效、长期结果、合适的患者群体和安全性。然而,它仍然是一种潜在的辅助治疗在室性心律失常的管理中选择的患者。连续星状神经节阻滞(C-SGB)提供了一种替代单次SGB和胸硬膜外麻醉的有效管理,减少室性心律失常,直到最终治疗;它是安全的,可以减少重复单发拦截的需要。摘要:SGB在文献中被描述为一种成功的辅助治疗,以减少心律失常负荷。阻断星状神经节可为控制难治性室性心律失常提供短暂的交感阻滞,否则药物治疗无法控制。通过调节交感神经系统,星状神经节影响心脏的电导,因此抑制星状神经节可以调节自主神经平衡,从而减少室性心律失常。2017年之前的这些研究仅限于病例报告和病例系列;Fudim等人的荟萃分析支持使用左侧SGB治疗室性心律失常。最近的临床试验进一步强化了这一发现,并支持导管用于持续SGB的趋势。需要进一步的研究来确定合适的患者群体以及何时开始SBG或C-SGB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regional anesthesia for arrhythmias: a review of current literature.

Purpose of the review: The aim is to provide a comprehensive review of regional anesthesia techniques to control ventricular arrhythmias.

Recent findings: While promising, the use of stellate ganglion block (SGB) for arrhythmia control is still under investigation, and further clinical trials are warranted to fully understand its efficacy, long-term outcomes, suitable patient group, and safety profile. Nevertheless, it remains a potential adjunctive therapy in the management of ventricular arrhythmias in select patients. Continuous stellate ganglion block (C-SGB) offers an alternative to single-shot SGB and thoracic epidural anesthesia for effective management in the reduction of ventricular arrhythmias until definitive treatment; it is safe and may reduce the need to repeat the single-shot block.

Summary: SGB has been described in the literature as a successful adjunct therapy to reduce arrhythmia load. Blocking the stellate ganglion can provide transient sympathetic blockade for controlling refractory ventricular arrhythmias, otherwise uncontrolled with medication management. By regulating the sympathetic nervous system, the stellate ganglion affects the electrical conductance of the heart, and thus inhibition of the ganglion can modulate the autonomic balance with subsequent reduction in ventricular arrhythmias. These studies until 2017 were limited to case reports and case series; meta-analysis by Fudim et al. supports the use of left-sided SGB to manage ventricular arrhythmias. Recent clinical trials further strengthen the findings and favor the trend of catheter use for continuous SGB. Further studies are warranted to identify suitable patient groups and when to initiate SBG or C-SGB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信