Cem Onal, Ozan Cem Guler, Gurcan Erbay, Birhan Demirhan, Aysenur Elmali, Melek Yavuz
{"title":"Propensity Score Matched Analysis of External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without Focal Boost to Intraprostatic Lesions in Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Cem Onal, Ozan Cem Guler, Gurcan Erbay, Birhan Demirhan, Aysenur Elmali, Melek Yavuz","doi":"10.1002/pros.24888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of radiotherapy (RT) with or without a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to intraprostatic lesions on survival, recurrence, and toxicity in localized prostate cancer (PCa). Key prognostic and predictive factors were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included 712 intermediate- and high-risk PCa patients treated with external beam RT at 78 Gy, with or without SIB (up to 86 Gy), between 2010 and 2018. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to ensure comparability. Outcomes assessed included biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), and treatment-related toxicities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 417 patients were analyzed (208 with SIB, 209 without). Over a median follow-up of 8.6 years, the SIB group showed higher 8-year bDFS (93.8% vs. 83.5%; p = 0.006) and lower rates of DM (6.1% vs. 13.0%; p = 0.003) and LR (1.8% vs. 6.9%; p = 0.03). PCSS was similar between groups (95.7% vs. 92.3%; p = 0.38). Advanced T stage and absence of SIB were predictors of worse bDFS, DM, and LR, while higher Gleason score were associated with poorer PCSS and DM in multivariable analysis. There were no significant differences in 8-year Grade ≥ 2 GU (10.1% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.98) or GI (7.8% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.64) toxicities between the SIB and non-SIB groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SIB with external beam RT significantly improves bDFS and reduces LR and DM in intermediate- and high-risk PCa, with no increase in significant toxicities. These findings emphasize the value of dose escalation in achieving better local control and long-term outcomes while maintaining patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24888","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:这项研究评估了对前列腺内病灶进行放疗(RT)并同时进行综合增强(SIB)或不进行综合增强(SIB)对局部前列腺癌(PCa)患者的生存率、复发率和毒性的影响。同时还分析了主要的预后和预测因素:一项回顾性分析纳入了2010年至2018年间接受78 Gy体外射束RT治疗的712名中高危PCa患者,无论是否接受SIB(最多86 Gy)治疗。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)以确保可比性。评估的结果包括生化无病生存期(bDFS)、前列腺癌特异性生存期(PCSS)、局部复发(LR)、远处转移(DM)和治疗相关毒性反应:在 PSM 治疗后,共分析了 417 例患者(208 例接受了 SIB 治疗,209 例未接受 SIB 治疗)。在8.6年的中位随访中,SIB组的8年bDFS较高(93.8% vs. 83.5%;p = 0.006),DM(6.1% vs. 13.0%;p = 0.003)和LR(1.8% vs. 6.9%;p = 0.03)较低。两组的PCSS相似(95.7% vs. 92.3%; p = 0.38)。在多变量分析中,T期晚期和无SIB是bDFS、DM和LR较差的预测因素,而较高的Gleason评分与较差的PCSS和DM相关。SIB组和非SIB组在8年GU(10.1% vs. 10.5%;p = 0.98)或消化道(7.8% vs. 6.5%;p = 0.64)毒性≥2级方面无明显差异:结论:SIB联合体外射束RT可明显改善中、高危PCa的bDFS,降低LR和DM,且无明显毒性增加。这些发现强调了剂量升级在实现更好的局部控制和长期疗效,同时保证患者安全方面的价值。
Propensity Score Matched Analysis of External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without Focal Boost to Intraprostatic Lesions in Prostate Cancer.
Background: This study evaluated the impact of radiotherapy (RT) with or without a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to intraprostatic lesions on survival, recurrence, and toxicity in localized prostate cancer (PCa). Key prognostic and predictive factors were also analyzed.
Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis included 712 intermediate- and high-risk PCa patients treated with external beam RT at 78 Gy, with or without SIB (up to 86 Gy), between 2010 and 2018. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to ensure comparability. Outcomes assessed included biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), and treatment-related toxicities.
Results: After PSM, 417 patients were analyzed (208 with SIB, 209 without). Over a median follow-up of 8.6 years, the SIB group showed higher 8-year bDFS (93.8% vs. 83.5%; p = 0.006) and lower rates of DM (6.1% vs. 13.0%; p = 0.003) and LR (1.8% vs. 6.9%; p = 0.03). PCSS was similar between groups (95.7% vs. 92.3%; p = 0.38). Advanced T stage and absence of SIB were predictors of worse bDFS, DM, and LR, while higher Gleason score were associated with poorer PCSS and DM in multivariable analysis. There were no significant differences in 8-year Grade ≥ 2 GU (10.1% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.98) or GI (7.8% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.64) toxicities between the SIB and non-SIB groups.
Conclusions: SIB with external beam RT significantly improves bDFS and reduces LR and DM in intermediate- and high-risk PCa, with no increase in significant toxicities. These findings emphasize the value of dose escalation in achieving better local control and long-term outcomes while maintaining patient safety.
期刊介绍:
The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.