畸形足早期复发手术矫正后的踝关节活动范围。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
David E Westberry, Emily R Shull, Daphne Lew, Prabhav Saraswat, Emily Waters, Lauren C Hyer
{"title":"畸形足早期复发手术矫正后的踝关节活动范围。","authors":"David E Westberry, Emily R Shull, Daphne Lew, Prabhav Saraswat, Emily Waters, Lauren C Hyer","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical options for relapsed clubfoot include repeat heel cord lengthening or posterior release for recurrent equinus, and anterior tibialis tendon transfer (ATT) for residual dynamic supination deformity. Some studies have suggested that these procedures be performed in isolation to allow for early range of motion after intra-articular surgery. This study was performed to examine clinical and radiographic outcomes comparing two surgical methods, simultaneous ATT with posterior release (ATT/PR) vs ATT performed in isolation (ATT(i)), for the management of recurrent clubfoot deformity. Patients who underwent ATT(i) and ATT/PR for relapsed clubfoot deformity after initial Ponseti casting, were 2-20 years old at time of surgery, and had postoperative range of motion (ROM) data, pedobarographic data, and radiographic results with minimal follow-up of 1 year were included. A total of 49 patients (69 feet) were reviewed. Mean age at time of surgery was 4.4 (SD 1.73) years. Of the 69 feet, 27 received ATT(i) and 42 received ATT/PR. No difference in the ROM outcome of ankle dorsiflexion was found between ATT(i) vs ATT/PR at a mean of 5.8 years follow-up. In patients undergoing ATT(i), there was a mild increase in lateral loading of the foot compared to those feet having ATT/PR. Follow up radiographic results for both groups were in the normal range, with less residual radiographic equinus in the ATT/PR group. ATT(i) or ATT performed along with intra-articular posterior capsular release offers comparable short-term outcomes. Level of evidence. This study was a retrospective case series, Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ankle range of motion following surgical correction of early relapse in clubfoot.\",\"authors\":\"David E Westberry, Emily R Shull, Daphne Lew, Prabhav Saraswat, Emily Waters, Lauren C Hyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Surgical options for relapsed clubfoot include repeat heel cord lengthening or posterior release for recurrent equinus, and anterior tibialis tendon transfer (ATT) for residual dynamic supination deformity. Some studies have suggested that these procedures be performed in isolation to allow for early range of motion after intra-articular surgery. This study was performed to examine clinical and radiographic outcomes comparing two surgical methods, simultaneous ATT with posterior release (ATT/PR) vs ATT performed in isolation (ATT(i)), for the management of recurrent clubfoot deformity. Patients who underwent ATT(i) and ATT/PR for relapsed clubfoot deformity after initial Ponseti casting, were 2-20 years old at time of surgery, and had postoperative range of motion (ROM) data, pedobarographic data, and radiographic results with minimal follow-up of 1 year were included. A total of 49 patients (69 feet) were reviewed. Mean age at time of surgery was 4.4 (SD 1.73) years. Of the 69 feet, 27 received ATT(i) and 42 received ATT/PR. No difference in the ROM outcome of ankle dorsiflexion was found between ATT(i) vs ATT/PR at a mean of 5.8 years follow-up. In patients undergoing ATT(i), there was a mild increase in lateral loading of the foot compared to those feet having ATT/PR. Follow up radiographic results for both groups were in the normal range, with less residual radiographic equinus in the ATT/PR group. ATT(i) or ATT performed along with intra-articular posterior capsular release offers comparable short-term outcomes. Level of evidence. This study was a retrospective case series, Level IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001249\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗复发性内翻足的手术选择包括针对复发性马蹄足的重复足后跟延长或后路松解,以及针对残留的动态旋后畸形的胫骨前腱转移(ATT)。一些研究表明,这些手术应单独进行,以便在关节内手术后早期活动范围。本研究比较了两种治疗复发性内翻足畸形的手术方法的临床和影像学结果,即联合ATT/PR和单独ATT(ATT(i))。在最初的Ponseti铸型后接受ATT(i)和ATT/PR治疗复发性内翻足畸形的患者,在手术时年龄为2-20岁,有术后活动范围(ROM)数据、足镜数据和最短随访1年的影像学结果。共有49名患者(69英尺)接受了检查。手术时的平均年龄为4.4岁(SD 1.73)。在69英尺中,27英尺收到了ATT(i), 42英尺收到了ATT/PR。在平均5.8年的随访中,发现ATT(i)与ATT/PR之间踝关节背屈的ROM结果没有差异。在接受ATT(i)的患者中,与患有ATT/PR的患者相比,足部的侧向负荷轻微增加。两组随访放射学结果均在正常范围内,ATT/PR组残留放射学马蹄较少。ATT(i)或ATT联合关节内后囊膜松解术短期疗效相当。证据水平。本研究为回顾性病例系列,四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ankle range of motion following surgical correction of early relapse in clubfoot.

Surgical options for relapsed clubfoot include repeat heel cord lengthening or posterior release for recurrent equinus, and anterior tibialis tendon transfer (ATT) for residual dynamic supination deformity. Some studies have suggested that these procedures be performed in isolation to allow for early range of motion after intra-articular surgery. This study was performed to examine clinical and radiographic outcomes comparing two surgical methods, simultaneous ATT with posterior release (ATT/PR) vs ATT performed in isolation (ATT(i)), for the management of recurrent clubfoot deformity. Patients who underwent ATT(i) and ATT/PR for relapsed clubfoot deformity after initial Ponseti casting, were 2-20 years old at time of surgery, and had postoperative range of motion (ROM) data, pedobarographic data, and radiographic results with minimal follow-up of 1 year were included. A total of 49 patients (69 feet) were reviewed. Mean age at time of surgery was 4.4 (SD 1.73) years. Of the 69 feet, 27 received ATT(i) and 42 received ATT/PR. No difference in the ROM outcome of ankle dorsiflexion was found between ATT(i) vs ATT/PR at a mean of 5.8 years follow-up. In patients undergoing ATT(i), there was a mild increase in lateral loading of the foot compared to those feet having ATT/PR. Follow up radiographic results for both groups were in the normal range, with less residual radiographic equinus in the ATT/PR group. ATT(i) or ATT performed along with intra-articular posterior capsular release offers comparable short-term outcomes. Level of evidence. This study was a retrospective case series, Level IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信