Bo Zhang, Panpan Huai, Ruihua Jin, Lan Mu, Jialing Lv
{"title":"群体问题管理对心理困扰个体的有效性:系统回顾与元分析。","authors":"Bo Zhang, Panpan Huai, Ruihua Jin, Lan Mu, Jialing Lv","doi":"10.3928/02793695-20250305-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of Group Problem Management Plus (Group PM+) as an intervention for individuals experiencing psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The current study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Multiple databases were searched electronically between June 2015 and June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of Group PM+ for people experiencing psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine research studies (<i>N</i> = 1,913 patients) were included. Group PM+ improved physical functioning (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-4.05, -0.72]; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and reduced negative emotions (SMD = -1.08, 95% CI [-1.72, -0.44]; <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, there were no statistically significant improvements in social-interpersonal level (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI [-0.80, 1.73]; <i>p</i> = 0.47) or reduction of antecedent and posttraumatic disorders (SMD = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.68, 0.54]; <i>p</i> = 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For people who experience psychological distress, Group PM+ helps improve physical functioning and minimize negative emotions. Yet, it is undetermined whether the intervention enhances social interpersonal levels and diminishes antecedent and posttraumatic disorders. A more robust RCT should be performed in the future that will verify the efficacy of Group PM+ for individuals experiencing psychological distress. [<i>Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 63</i>(7), 33-41.].</p>","PeriodicalId":50071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services","volume":" ","pages":"33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Group Problem Management Plus Among Individuals Experiencing Psychological Distress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bo Zhang, Panpan Huai, Ruihua Jin, Lan Mu, Jialing Lv\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/02793695-20250305-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of Group Problem Management Plus (Group PM+) as an intervention for individuals experiencing psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The current study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Multiple databases were searched electronically between June 2015 and June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of Group PM+ for people experiencing psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine research studies (<i>N</i> = 1,913 patients) were included. Group PM+ improved physical functioning (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-4.05, -0.72]; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and reduced negative emotions (SMD = -1.08, 95% CI [-1.72, -0.44]; <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, there were no statistically significant improvements in social-interpersonal level (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI [-0.80, 1.73]; <i>p</i> = 0.47) or reduction of antecedent and posttraumatic disorders (SMD = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.68, 0.54]; <i>p</i> = 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For people who experience psychological distress, Group PM+ helps improve physical functioning and minimize negative emotions. Yet, it is undetermined whether the intervention enhances social interpersonal levels and diminishes antecedent and posttraumatic disorders. A more robust RCT should be performed in the future that will verify the efficacy of Group PM+ for individuals experiencing psychological distress. [<i>Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 63</i>(7), 33-41.].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"33-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20250305-02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20250305-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估“群体问题管理+”(Group Problem Management Plus,简称PM+)作为个体心理困扰干预的效果。方法:本研究采用系统综述和荟萃分析。2015年6月至2024年6月期间,通过电子方式检索了多个数据库,以进行随机对照试验(rct),评估Group PM+对经历心理困扰的人的有效性。结果:纳入9项研究(N = 1913例患者)。PM+改善身体功能组(标准化平均差[SMD] = -2.39, 95%可信区间[CI] [-4.05, -0.72];p < 0.01),负性情绪减少(SMD = -1.08, 95% CI [-1.72, -0.44];P < 0.01)。然而,在社会人际水平上没有统计学上的显著改善(SMD = 0.46, 95% CI [-0.80, 1.73];p = 0.47)或减少创伤前障碍和创伤后障碍(SMD = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.68, 0.54];P = 0.82)。结论:对于有心理困扰的人来说,Group PM+有助于改善身体机能,减少负面情绪。然而,干预是否提高社会人际水平和减少创伤前和创伤后障碍尚不确定。未来应该进行更强大的随机对照试验,以验证PM+组对经历心理困扰的个体的有效性。[社会心理护理与精神卫生服务杂志,xx(x), xx-xx.]
Effectiveness of Group Problem Management Plus Among Individuals Experiencing Psychological Distress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Purpose: To assess the impact of Group Problem Management Plus (Group PM+) as an intervention for individuals experiencing psychological distress.
Method: The current study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Multiple databases were searched electronically between June 2015 and June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of Group PM+ for people experiencing psychological distress.
Results: Nine research studies (N = 1,913 patients) were included. Group PM+ improved physical functioning (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-4.05, -0.72]; p < 0.01) and reduced negative emotions (SMD = -1.08, 95% CI [-1.72, -0.44]; p < 0.01). However, there were no statistically significant improvements in social-interpersonal level (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI [-0.80, 1.73]; p = 0.47) or reduction of antecedent and posttraumatic disorders (SMD = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.68, 0.54]; p = 0.82).
Conclusion: For people who experience psychological distress, Group PM+ helps improve physical functioning and minimize negative emotions. Yet, it is undetermined whether the intervention enhances social interpersonal levels and diminishes antecedent and posttraumatic disorders. A more robust RCT should be performed in the future that will verify the efficacy of Group PM+ for individuals experiencing psychological distress. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 63(7), 33-41.].
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal for psychosocial and mental health nurses in a variety of community and institutional settings. For more than 50 years, the Journal has provided the most up-to-date, practical information available for today’s psychosocial-mental health nurse, including short contributions about psychopharmacology, mental health care of older adults, addictive behaviors and diagnoses, and child/adolescent disorders and issues. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as:
• Monthly feature, “Clip & Save: Drug Chart,” a one-page resource of up-to-date information on current medications for various psychiatric illnesses
• Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content
• Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance
• Continuing Nursing Education credits available each month