骨折水疱的术前处理:系统回顾。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Efort Open Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-03 Print Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1530/EOR-2024-0074
Ishtar Redman, Kapil Sugand, Aashtad Daruwalla, Andrew Clark
{"title":"骨折水疱的术前处理:系统回顾。","authors":"Ishtar Redman, Kapil Sugand, Aashtad Daruwalla, Andrew Clark","doi":"10.1530/EOR-2024-0074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The pre-operative management of fracture blisters is an area of uncertainty within trauma and orthopaedic surgeries. Management strategies vary significantly between and within orthopaedic departments across the United Kingdom. The purpose of this systematic review was to comprehensively appraise and synthesize the existing literature pertaining to this topic, highlighting current practices and areas for ongoing research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Extensive electronic literature searches were performed on PubMed/MEDLINE (January 1946-May 2024), Embase (January 1974-May 2024) and Cochrane library (January 1933-May 2024) databases. The search terms were as follows: (fracture blister OR bone blister*) AND (dress* OR drain* OR aspirat* OR deroof* OR manage*). These keywords were searched in the subject headings, in title and in abstract.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the search methodology revealed five articles, which represented the best evidence to the clinical question. These papers reported on rates of wound healing and post-operative infection, time to surgical readiness and treatment costs, following varying treatment modalities in 1162 patients. The authors, publication dates, countries, patient groups, study outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated in Supplementary Table 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fracture blisters pose a significant challenge in clinical practice, leading to delays in surgery, suboptimal surgical approaches and complications in wound healing post-operatively. Currently, there is no consensus describing the optimal management of these blisters. This review challenges the conventional belief that fracture blisters are sterile, highlighting that the application of topical agents to the deroofed blister bed may expedite surgical readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"10 3","pages":"166-171"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11896682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-operative management of fracture blisters: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Ishtar Redman, Kapil Sugand, Aashtad Daruwalla, Andrew Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/EOR-2024-0074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The pre-operative management of fracture blisters is an area of uncertainty within trauma and orthopaedic surgeries. Management strategies vary significantly between and within orthopaedic departments across the United Kingdom. The purpose of this systematic review was to comprehensively appraise and synthesize the existing literature pertaining to this topic, highlighting current practices and areas for ongoing research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Extensive electronic literature searches were performed on PubMed/MEDLINE (January 1946-May 2024), Embase (January 1974-May 2024) and Cochrane library (January 1933-May 2024) databases. The search terms were as follows: (fracture blister OR bone blister*) AND (dress* OR drain* OR aspirat* OR deroof* OR manage*). These keywords were searched in the subject headings, in title and in abstract.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the search methodology revealed five articles, which represented the best evidence to the clinical question. These papers reported on rates of wound healing and post-operative infection, time to surgical readiness and treatment costs, following varying treatment modalities in 1162 patients. The authors, publication dates, countries, patient groups, study outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated in Supplementary Table 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fracture blisters pose a significant challenge in clinical practice, leading to delays in surgery, suboptimal surgical approaches and complications in wound healing post-operatively. Currently, there is no consensus describing the optimal management of these blisters. This review challenges the conventional belief that fracture blisters are sterile, highlighting that the application of topical agents to the deroofed blister bed may expedite surgical readiness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"166-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11896682/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2024-0074\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2024-0074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:骨折水疱的术前处理是创伤和骨科手术中一个不确定的领域。管理策略在英国骨科部门之间和内部差异很大。本系统综述的目的是全面评价和综合与该主题相关的现有文献,突出当前的实践和正在进行的研究领域。方法:对PubMed/MEDLINE(1946年1月- 2024年5月)、Embase(1974年1月- 2024年5月)和Cochrane图书馆(1933年1月- 2024年5月)数据库进行广泛的电子文献检索。搜索词如下:(骨折水泡或骨水泡*)和(包扎*或引流*或抽吸*或清除*或管理*)。在主题标题、标题和摘要中搜索这些关键词。结果:检索方法的结果显示了五篇文章,它们代表了临床问题的最佳证据。这些论文报道了1162例患者的伤口愈合率和术后感染率,手术准备时间和治疗费用,采用不同的治疗方式。这些论文的作者、发表日期、国家、患者群体、研究结果和结果列于补充表1。结论:骨折水疱在临床实践中是一个重大挑战,导致手术延误,手术入路不佳和术后伤口愈合并发症。目前,没有共识描述这些水泡的最佳管理。这篇综述挑战了传统的观点,即骨折水泡是无菌的,强调局部药物应用于去皮的水泡床可能会加快手术准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-operative management of fracture blisters: a systematic review.

Purpose: The pre-operative management of fracture blisters is an area of uncertainty within trauma and orthopaedic surgeries. Management strategies vary significantly between and within orthopaedic departments across the United Kingdom. The purpose of this systematic review was to comprehensively appraise and synthesize the existing literature pertaining to this topic, highlighting current practices and areas for ongoing research.

Methods: Extensive electronic literature searches were performed on PubMed/MEDLINE (January 1946-May 2024), Embase (January 1974-May 2024) and Cochrane library (January 1933-May 2024) databases. The search terms were as follows: (fracture blister OR bone blister*) AND (dress* OR drain* OR aspirat* OR deroof* OR manage*). These keywords were searched in the subject headings, in title and in abstract.

Results: The results of the search methodology revealed five articles, which represented the best evidence to the clinical question. These papers reported on rates of wound healing and post-operative infection, time to surgical readiness and treatment costs, following varying treatment modalities in 1162 patients. The authors, publication dates, countries, patient groups, study outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated in Supplementary Table 1.

Conclusion: Fracture blisters pose a significant challenge in clinical practice, leading to delays in surgery, suboptimal surgical approaches and complications in wound healing post-operatively. Currently, there is no consensus describing the optimal management of these blisters. This review challenges the conventional belief that fracture blisters are sterile, highlighting that the application of topical agents to the deroofed blister bed may expedite surgical readiness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信