痴呆患者照护者未满足需求心理测量评估工具(UNI-C)。

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elise Mansfield, Emilie Cameron, Matthew Clapham, Alix Hall, Allison Boyes
{"title":"痴呆患者照护者未满足需求心理测量评估工具(UNI-C)。","authors":"Elise Mansfield, Emilie Cameron, Matthew Clapham, Alix Hall, Allison Boyes","doi":"10.1186/s41687-025-00856-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carers play an important role in providing practical and emotional support to people with dementia. There is a need to ensure carers are supported in this role to maximise their ability to provide care while maintaining their own wellbeing. This study aimed to develop a psychometrically rigorous self-report instrument to assess the unmet needs of carers of people with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Unmet Needs Instrument for Carers of People with Dementia (UNI-C) was developed using a multi-methods approach including a comprehensive literature review, in-depth interviews and focus groups, expert opinion, cognitive interviews and pilot testing. A cross-sectional survey of 169 carers was used to examine the psychometric characteristics of the instrument. Specifically, internal reliability, and structural and convergent validity were assessed and the number of items reduced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The original 80 item instrument was reduced to 46 items across four domains based on prevalence, item-total and pairwise correlations, factor loadings and clinical relevance. The resulting instrument, named the UNI-C46, showed acceptable evidence of structural and convergent validity, and good internal reliability (α = 0.94) and acceptability. The four domains measure 'Your own wellbeing' (16 items), 'Finding information' (12 items), 'Managing practical needs' (10 items), and 'Managing dementia symptoms' (8 items).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides the first demonstration of reliability and validity of the UNI-C46. Further testing of these properties with a larger and more representative sample of carers is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11896954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric evaluation of the unmet needs instrument for carers of people with dementia (UNI-C).\",\"authors\":\"Elise Mansfield, Emilie Cameron, Matthew Clapham, Alix Hall, Allison Boyes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41687-025-00856-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carers play an important role in providing practical and emotional support to people with dementia. There is a need to ensure carers are supported in this role to maximise their ability to provide care while maintaining their own wellbeing. This study aimed to develop a psychometrically rigorous self-report instrument to assess the unmet needs of carers of people with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Unmet Needs Instrument for Carers of People with Dementia (UNI-C) was developed using a multi-methods approach including a comprehensive literature review, in-depth interviews and focus groups, expert opinion, cognitive interviews and pilot testing. A cross-sectional survey of 169 carers was used to examine the psychometric characteristics of the instrument. Specifically, internal reliability, and structural and convergent validity were assessed and the number of items reduced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The original 80 item instrument was reduced to 46 items across four domains based on prevalence, item-total and pairwise correlations, factor loadings and clinical relevance. The resulting instrument, named the UNI-C46, showed acceptable evidence of structural and convergent validity, and good internal reliability (α = 0.94) and acceptability. The four domains measure 'Your own wellbeing' (16 items), 'Finding information' (12 items), 'Managing practical needs' (10 items), and 'Managing dementia symptoms' (8 items).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides the first demonstration of reliability and validity of the UNI-C46. Further testing of these properties with a larger and more representative sample of carers is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11896954/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00856-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00856-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护理人员在为痴呆症患者提供实际和情感支持方面发挥着重要作用。有必要确保护理人员在这个角色中得到支持,以最大限度地提高他们提供护理的能力,同时保持他们自己的健康。本研究旨在开发一种心理计量学上严格的自我报告工具,以评估痴呆症患者护理人员未满足的需求。方法:采用综合文献综述、深度访谈和焦点小组、专家意见、认知访谈和试点测试等多方法编制《失智者照护者未满足需求量表》(UNI-C)。对169名护理人员进行了横断面调查,以检验该工具的心理测量特征。具体而言,评估了内部信度,结构效度和收敛效度,并减少了项目数量。结果:基于患病率、项目总数和两两相关性、因素负荷和临床相关性,最初的80项工具减少到46项,跨越四个领域。结果显示,UNI-C46具有良好的结构效度和收敛效度,具有良好的内部信度(α = 0.94)和可接受性。这四个领域衡量的是“你自己的幸福”(16个项目)、“寻找信息”(12个项目)、“管理实际需求”(10个项目)和“管理痴呆症状”(8个项目)。结论:本研究首次证明了UNI-C46的信度和效度。建议使用更大、更有代表性的护理人员样本对这些特性进行进一步测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric evaluation of the unmet needs instrument for carers of people with dementia (UNI-C).

Background: Carers play an important role in providing practical and emotional support to people with dementia. There is a need to ensure carers are supported in this role to maximise their ability to provide care while maintaining their own wellbeing. This study aimed to develop a psychometrically rigorous self-report instrument to assess the unmet needs of carers of people with dementia.

Methods: The Unmet Needs Instrument for Carers of People with Dementia (UNI-C) was developed using a multi-methods approach including a comprehensive literature review, in-depth interviews and focus groups, expert opinion, cognitive interviews and pilot testing. A cross-sectional survey of 169 carers was used to examine the psychometric characteristics of the instrument. Specifically, internal reliability, and structural and convergent validity were assessed and the number of items reduced.

Results: The original 80 item instrument was reduced to 46 items across four domains based on prevalence, item-total and pairwise correlations, factor loadings and clinical relevance. The resulting instrument, named the UNI-C46, showed acceptable evidence of structural and convergent validity, and good internal reliability (α = 0.94) and acceptability. The four domains measure 'Your own wellbeing' (16 items), 'Finding information' (12 items), 'Managing practical needs' (10 items), and 'Managing dementia symptoms' (8 items).

Conclusions: This study provides the first demonstration of reliability and validity of the UNI-C46. Further testing of these properties with a larger and more representative sample of carers is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信